Literature DB >> 22007634

The association between the psychological status and the severity of facial deformity in orthognathic patients.

Aleksandra Kovalenko1, Anna Slabkovskaya, Nailya Drobysheva, Leonid Persin, Alexey Drobyshev, Marcello Maddalone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychological status and correlate it with the severity of facial deformities of patients with skeletal malocclusions before orthognathic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 96 patients aged 15 to 47 with skeletal malocclusions were examined before orthognathic treatment was provided. A photographic analysis was carried out to determine the severity of facial deformity according to the Facial Aesthetic Index (FA1). All patients were divided into three groups according to the FAI score: light (0 to 9), moderate (10 to 19), and severe (>19) facial deformities. Thirty subjects aged 17 to 39 with normal occlusion and attractive harmonious faces without previous orthodontic and/or surgical history were taken as controls. Psychological testing of controls and patients in the study group was performed before orthognathic treatment was provided.
RESULTS: Psychological testing showed no statistically significant differences among groups with light and moderate facial deformity and subjects in the control group. Significant differences were encountered among patients with severe facial deformities compared with controls in a series of personality traits, including introversion, neuroticism, trait anxiety, dependency, unsociability, and leadership.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthognathic patients with different degrees of facial deformity have different psychological profiles. Patients with light and moderate facial deformity have no significant psychological problems. Patients with severe facial deformity show a significantly higher prevalence of emotional instability, introversion, anxiety, and unsociability. Such psychological profiles make orthognathic patients with severe facial deformity prone to psychological distress, depression, and adverse psychological reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22007634      PMCID: PMC8865818          DOI: 10.2319/060211-363.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  36 in total

1.  Psychological function in orthognathic surgical patients before and after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid and wire fixation.

Authors:  J P Hatch; J D Rugh; R A Bays; J E Van Sickels; S D Keeling; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 2.  [The psychological implications of orthognathic surgery].

Authors:  Georges Wackens
Journal:  Rev Belge Med Dent (1984)       Date:  2002

3.  Psychological support for orthognathic patients -- what do orthodontists want?

Authors:  K J Juggins; C Feinmann; J Shute; S J Cunningham
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2006-06

4.  Surgical enhancement of facial beauty and its psychological significance.

Authors:  Moghees A Baig
Journal:  Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg       Date:  2004-10

5.  Pre- and postsurgical psycho-emotional aspects of the orthognathic surgery patient.

Authors:  F Bertolini; V Russo; G Sansebastiano
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  2000

6.  Psychological characteristics of women who require orthognathic surgery: comparison with untreated controls.

Authors:  D M Williams; R Bentley; M T Cobourne; A Gibilaro; S Good; C Huppa; N S Matthews; E O'Higgins; S Patel; J T Newton
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  The emotional impact of orthognathic surgery and conventional orthodontics.

Authors:  H A Kiyak; R W McNeill; R A West
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-09

8.  Personality characteristics as predictors and sequelae of surgical and conventional orthodontics.

Authors:  H A Kiyak; R W McNeill; R A West; T Hohl; P J Heaton
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1986-05

9.  Body dysmorphic disorder screening in maxillofacial outpatients presenting for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  N C C Vulink; A Rosenberg; J M Plooij; R Koole; S J Bergé; D Denys
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Patients' expectations as predictors of orthognathic surgery outcomes.

Authors:  H A Kiyak; P P Vitaliano; J Crinean
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of two survey instruments measuring quality of life in pediatric dentofacial patients.

Authors:  Alan Carlotto; Shiva Shanker; F Michael Beck; Allen Firestone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Psychosocial changes in patients submitted to orthodontic surgery treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Isabela Bittencourt Basso; Flavio Magno Gonçalves; Agnes Andrade Martins; Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder; Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira; José Stechman-Neto; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Odilon Guariza-Filho; Cristiano Miranda de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.606

3.  Second Class Functional Treatment: Andreasen Activator vs Twin Block.

Authors:  Giulia Baccaglione; Elisa Rota; Maurizio Ferrari; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

4.  Do Specific Craniomaxillofacial Features Correlate with Psychological Distress in Adult Pretreatment Orthodontic Patients? A Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Chu-Qiao Xiao; Yi-Dan Wan; Zhe-Bin Yan; Ya-Qi Li; Pei-Di Fan; Qiao-Yu Cheng; Xin Xiong
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Relationship between the Position of the Incisors and the Thickness of the Soft Tissues in the Upper Jaw: Cephalometric Evaluation.

Authors:  Marcello Maddalone; Federico Losi; Elisa Rota; Marco G Baldoni
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

6.  Dentofacial Effects of Modified Alt-RAMEC Protocol Combined with the Facial Mask for Treatment of Preadolescent Caucasian Class III Patients.

Authors:  Elisa Rota; Maurizio Ferrari; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2019 May-Jun

7.  Effectiveness of Tongue Crib Combination Treating Severe Skeletal Angle Class III Malocclusion in Mixed Dentition.

Authors:  Wenting Zhao; Yan Chen; Hee-Moon Kyung; Jin-Shuai Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

8.  The relation of severe malocclusion to patients' mental and behavioral disorders, growth, and speech problems.

Authors:  Anu Koskela; Anneli Neittaanmäki; Kaj Rönnberg; Aarno Palotie; Samuli Ripatti; Tuula Palotie
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Effect of malocclusion on the self-esteem of adolescents.

Authors:  Salwa Mahmoud Taibah; Fadia Mohammed Al-Hummayani
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.