Literature DB >> 34817686

Psychosocial changes in patients submitted to orthodontic surgery treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Isabela Bittencourt Basso1, Flavio Magno Gonçalves2, Agnes Andrade Martins3, Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder4, Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira5, José Stechman-Neto2, Rosane Sampaio Santos2, Odilon Guariza-Filho6, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to answer the following question: What is the psychological impact of orthognathic surgery on patients with dentofacial deformities undergoing orthodontic-surgical treatment?
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The search was adapted for each of the following databases: American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences (LILACS), Cochrane Library, Embase, Psychinfo, PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Web of Science, and gray literature using Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ProQuest. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Assessment Checklist. This study performed estimates of interest, random-effects meta-analyses, and calculated heterogeneity using Higgins inconsistency index (I2).
RESULTS: A total of 6751 references were found in all searches. After applying the eligibility criteria after full-text reading, 37 studies comprised the final qualitative synthesis. Thirteen studies were included in quantitative synthesis, and it was possible to meta-analyze data from the following questionnaires: GHQ-28, MMPI, RSES, and SCL-90-R. There was an improvement in psychological aspects related to depression, hysteria, self-esteem, anxiety, obsessive-compulsiveness, interpersonal sensitivity, paranoid ideas, and psychoticism (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Correction of dentofacial deformity through orthodontic-surgical treatment is associated with improvements observed in several psychological domains, especially in relation to depressive states. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This result highlights the importance of surgeons and orthodontists in promoting adequate control of patients' expectations and treatment goals taking into account the individual's psychological aspects.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthodontics; Orthognathic surgery; Psychosocial changes; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34817686     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04304-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.606


  45 in total

1.  Psychological profiles in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery or rhinoplasty: a preoperative and preliminary comparison.

Authors:  Matteo Brucoli; Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena; Paolo Boffano; Arnaldo Benech
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-04-23

Review 2.  Patients' perceptions of orthognathic treatment, well-being, and psychological or psychiatric status: a systematic review.

Authors:  Outi M E Alanko; Anna-Liisa Svedström-Oristo; Martti T Tuomisto
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 3.  The psychosocial impact of orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  O T Hunt; C D Johnston; P G Hepper; D J Burden
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 4.  The impact of oro-facial appearance on oral health-related quality of life: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pernilla Larsson; Lars Bondemark; Birgitta Häggman-Henrikson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 5.  Do patients benefit from orthognathic surgery? A systematic review on the effects of elective orthognathic surgery on psychosocial functioning and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Dyonne L M Broers; Geert J M G van der Heijden; Frederik R Rozema; Ad de Jongh
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.612

6.  Impact of orthosurgical treatment phases on oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Nathália Barbosa Palomares; Roger Keller Celeste; José Augusto M Miguel
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 7.  Impacts of Orthognathic Surgery on Patient Satisfaction, Overall Quality of Life, and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Rodrigo Zamboni; Flávio Renato Reis de Moura; Myrian Camara Brew; Elken Gomes Rivaldo; Marcylene Arruda Braz; Eduardo Grossmann; Caren Serra Bavaresco
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-06-16

8.  Accuracy of three-dimensional virtual simulation of the soft tissues of the face in OrtogOnBlender for correction of class II dentofacial deformities: an uncontrolled experimental case-series study.

Authors:  Hugo Santos Cunha; Cícero André da Costa Moraes; Rodrigo de Faria Valle Dornelles; Everton Luis Santos da Rosa
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-11-08

9.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-29

10.  Measuring patient-reported outcomes in orthognathic surgery: Linguistic and psychometric validation of the Mandarin Chinese version of FACE-Q instrument.

Authors:  Yu-Ying Su; Rafael Denadai; Cheng-Ting Ho; Bo-Ru Lai; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.