Literature DB >> 18786750

Psychological characteristics of women who require orthognathic surgery: comparison with untreated controls.

D M Williams1, R Bentley, M T Cobourne, A Gibilaro, S Good, C Huppa, N S Matthews, E O'Higgins, S Patel, J T Newton.   

Abstract

Improvement in appearance is an important motivation for orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery, and two possible underlying causes are objective physical abnormalities, or the patient's personality type that leads them to concentrate on their appearance and request unnecessary interventions. Questionnaires that measure personality traits were given to 30 women who required orthognathic operations, and a control group of 30 other women. Traits measured were: satisfaction with the appearance of the face, head, and body; tendency to compare their appearance with that of others; the extent to which they are aware of their appearance and how they thought they should look; sense of self identity; depression; anxiety; and self-esteem. The only difference between patients and controls was that patients were more dissatisfied with their facial appearance than the others. Orthognathic patients were psychologically normal except that they had more dissatisfaction with their facial appearance. As this was the only difference, it is likely that their desire for operation was caused by a genuine physical abnormality rather than a perceived exaggerated aesthetic problem. It seems, therefore, that any patient who seeks orthognathic treatment because they have a personality that causes them to dwell on their appearance (which may lead them to hold unrealistic expectations of intervention) are screened out of the process before they begin treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18786750     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.07.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  6 in total

1.  Psychosocial changes in patients submitted to orthodontic surgery treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Isabela Bittencourt Basso; Flavio Magno Gonçalves; Agnes Andrade Martins; Angela Graciela Deliga Schroder; Karinna Veríssimo Meira Taveira; José Stechman-Neto; Rosane Sampaio Santos; Odilon Guariza-Filho; Cristiano Miranda de Araujo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Do Specific Craniomaxillofacial Features Correlate with Psychological Distress in Adult Pretreatment Orthodontic Patients? A Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Chu-Qiao Xiao; Yi-Dan Wan; Zhe-Bin Yan; Ya-Qi Li; Pei-Di Fan; Qiao-Yu Cheng; Xin Xiong
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Why simple aesthetic dental treatment in general practice does not make all patients happy.

Authors:  S Sarin; D Gilbert; K Asimakopoulou
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Cephalometric methods of prediction in orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17

5.  The association between the psychological status and the severity of facial deformity in orthognathic patients.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kovalenko; Anna Slabkovskaya; Nailya Drobysheva; Leonid Persin; Alexey Drobyshev; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Prevalence of malocclusion and its relationship with caries among school children aged 11 - 15 years in southern India.

Authors:  Jagan Kumar Baskaradoss; Amrita Geevarghese; Clement Roger; Anil Thaliath
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 1.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.