Literature DB >> 16240831

The influence of spectral distinctiveness on acoustic cue weighting in children's and adults' speech perception.

Catherine Mayo1, Alice Turk.   

Abstract

Children and adults appear to weight some acoustic cues differently in perceiving certain speech contrasts. One possible explanation for this difference is that children and adults make use of different strategies in the way that they process speech. An alternative explanation is that adult-child cue weighting differences are due to more general sensory (auditory) processing differences between the two groups. It has been proposed that children may be less able to deal with incomplete or insufficient acoustic information than are adults, and thus may require cues that are longer, louder, or more spectrally distinct to identify or discriminate between auditory stimuli. The current study tested this hypothesis by examining adults' and 3- to 7-year-old children's cue weighting for contrasts in which vowel-onset formant transitions varied from spectrally distinct (/no/-/mo/, /do/-/bo/, and /ta/-/da/) to spectrally similar (/ni/-/mi/, /de/-/be/, and /ti/-/di/). Spectrally distinct cues were more likely to yield different consonantal responses than were spectrally similar cues, for all listeners. Furthermore, as predicted by a sensory hypothesis, children were less likely to give different consonantal responses to stimuli distinguished by spectrally similar transitional cues than were adults. However, this pattern of behavior did not hold for all contrasts. Implications for theories of adult-child cue weighting differences are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240831     DOI: 10.1121/1.1979451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg; Anne L R Duchen; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Formant onsets and formant transitions as developmental cues to vowel perception.

Authors:  Ralph N Ohde; Sarah R German
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Children weight dynamic spectral structure more than adults: evidence from equivalent signals.

Authors:  Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer; Eric Tarr
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of the distribution of acoustic cues on infants' perception of sibilants.

Authors:  Alejandrina Cristià; Grant L McGuire; Amanda Seidl; Alexander L Francis
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2011-07-01

6.  Children's recognition of American English consonants in noise.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Dawna E Lewis; Brenda M Hoover; Sangsook Choi; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Infants' use of isolated and combined temporal cues in speech sound segregation.

Authors:  Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Developmental plasticity in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Issues in human auditory development.

Authors:  Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Processing of lexical stress cues by young children.

Authors:  Carolyn Quam; Daniel Swingley
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-04-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.