Literature DB >> 21999863

Validation and characterization of transcatheter aortic valve effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography.

Marie-Annick Clavel1, Josep Rodés-Cabau, Éric Dumont, Rodrigo Bagur, Sébastien Bergeron, Robert De Larochellière, Daniel Doyle, Eric Larose, Jean G Dumesnil, Philippe Pibarot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to compare different Doppler echocardiographic methods for the measurement of prosthetic valve effective orifice area (EOA) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to determine the factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter balloon expandable valves.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have used different methods for the measurement of the valve EOA following TAVI. Factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter valves are unknown.
METHODS: A total of 122 patients underwent TAVI with the use of the Edwards-SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). The EOA was measured by transthoracic echocardiography at hospital discharge, 6 months and 1 year after TAVI with the use of 2 methods as described in previous studies. In Method #1 (EOA(1)), LVOT diameter (LVOTd) entered in the continuity equation was measured at the base of prosthesis cusps whereas, in Method #2 (EOA(2)), LVOTd was measured immediately proximal to the prosthesis stent.
RESULTS: The average EOA(2) (1.57 ± 0.41 cm(2)) was larger (p < 0.01) than the EOA(1) (1.21 ± 0.38 cm(2)). Accordingly, incidence of severe PPM (indexed EOA ≤0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) was 3-fold lower with the use of EOA(2) than with EOA(1) (9% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Mean transprosthetic gradient correlated better (p = 0.03) with indexed EOA(2) (r = -0.70, p < 0.0001) than with indexed EOA(1) (r = -0.58, p < 0.0001). Intraobserver and interobserver variability were lower for EOA(2) compared to EOA(1) (intra: 5% vs. 7%, p = 0.06; inter: 6% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Aortic annulus size was the sole independent determinant (p = 0.01) of prosthetic valve EOA(2). The average EOA varied from 1.37 ± 0.23 cm(2) for aortic annulus size <19 mm up to 1.90 ± 0.17 cm(2) for size >23 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: When estimating the EOA of Edwards-SAPIEN valves by Doppler-echocardiography, it is recommended to use the LVOT diameter and velocity measured immediately proximal to the stent. The main determinant of the EOA of transcatheter valves is the patient's annulus size and these valves provide excellent hemodynamics even in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21999863     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  15 in total

Review 1.  Guidance of transcatheter aortic valve replacement by echocardiography.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot; Jean-Gaston Dumesnil
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Echocardiographic outcomes of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN XT valves: the comparison of two bioprosthesis implanted in a single centre.

Authors:  Dayimi Kaya; Zulkif Tanriverdi; Huseyin Dursun; Tugce Colluoglu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  In vitro evaluation of flow patterns and turbulent kinetic energy in trans-catheter aortic valve prostheses.

Authors:  Daniel Giese; Kilian Weiss; Bettina Baeßler; Navid Madershahian; Yeong-Hoon Choi; David Maintz; Alexander C Bunck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current and future approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact of 2D-transthoracic echocardiography versus 3D-transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Cristina da Silva; Anders Sahlen; Reidar Winter; Magnus Bäck; Andreas Rück; Magnus Settergren; Aristomenis Manouras; Kambiz Shahgaldi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Abdellaziz Dahou; Haïfa Mahjoub; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-11

9.  Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Left Ventricular Myocardial Mechanics After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Frédéric Poulin; Teerapat Yingchoncharoen; William M Wilson; Eric M Horlick; Philippe Généreux; E Murat Tuzcu; William Stewart; Mark D Osten; Anna Woo; Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  The role of TTE in assessment of the patient before and following TAVI for AS.

Authors:  John Fryearson; Nicola C Edwards; Sagar N Doshi; Richard P Steeds
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.