Literature DB >> 21997778

CASP9 target classification.

Lisa N Kinch1, Shuoyong Shi, Hua Cheng, Qian Cong, Jimin Pei, Valerio Mariani, Torsten Schwede, Nick V Grishin.   

Abstract

The Critical assessment of protein structure prediction round 9 (CASP9) aimed to evaluate predictions for 129 experimentally determined protein structures. To assess tertiary structure predictions, these target structures were divided into domain-based evaluation units that were then classified into two assessment categories: template based modeling (TBM) and template free modeling (FM). CASP9 targets were split into domains of structurally compact evolutionary modules. For the targets with more than one defined domain, the decision to split structures into domains for evaluation was based on server performance. Target domains were categorized based on their evolutionary relatedness to existing templates as well as their difficulty levels indicated by server performance. Those target domains with sequence-related templates and high server prediction performance were classified as TMB, whereas those targets without identifiable templates and low server performance were classified as FM. However, using these generalizations for classification resulted in a blurred boundary between CASP9 assessment categories. Thus, the FM category included those domains without sequence detectable templates (25 target domains) as well as some domains with difficult to detect templates whose predictions were as poor as those without templates (five target domains). Several interesting examples are discussed, including targets with sequence related templates that exhibit unusual structural differences, targets with homologous or analogous structure templates that are not detectable by sequence, and targets with new folds.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21997778      PMCID: PMC3226894          DOI: 10.1002/prot.23190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  21 in total

Review 1.  3D domain swapping: as domains continue to swap.

Authors:  Yanshun Liu; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures.

Authors:  A G Murzin; S E Brenner; T Hubbard; C Chothia
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  A dual function of the CRISPR-Cas system in bacterial antivirus immunity and DNA repair.

Authors:  Mohan Babu; Natalia Beloglazova; Robert Flick; Chris Graham; Tatiana Skarina; Boguslaw Nocek; Alla Gagarinova; Oxana Pogoutse; Greg Brown; Andrew Binkowski; Sadhna Phanse; Andrzej Joachimiak; Eugene V Koonin; Alexei Savchenko; Andrew Emili; Jack Greenblatt; Aled M Edwards; Alexander F Yakunin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Analysis of CASP8 targets, predictions and assessment methods.

Authors:  Shuoyong Shi; Jimin Pei; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Lisa N Kinch; Indraneel Majumdar; Jing Tong; Hua Cheng; Bong-Hyun Kim; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Fas apoptosis inhibitory molecule contains a novel beta-sandwich in contact with a partially ordered domain.

Authors:  Michael Hemond; Thomas L Rothstein; Gerhard Wagner
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  The structural basis for recognition of base J containing DNA by a novel DNA binding domain in JBP1.

Authors:  Tatjana Heidebrecht; Evangelos Christodoulou; Michael J Chalmers; Sabrina Jan; Bas Ter Riet; Rajesh K Grover; Robbie P Joosten; Dene Littler; Henri van Luenen; Patrick R Griffin; Paul Wentworth; Piet Borst; Anastassis Perrakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction.

Authors:  Johannes Söding; Andreas Biegert; Andrei N Lupas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A database of domain definitions for proteins with complex interdomain geometry.

Authors:  Indraneel Majumdar; Lisa N Kinch; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Searching protein structure databases with DaliLite v.3.

Authors:  L Holm; S Kääriäinen; P Rosenström; A Schenkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  PROCAIN: protein profile comparison with assisting information.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  39 in total

1.  Target highlights in CASP9: Experimental target structures for the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; John Moult; Sergio G Bartual; J Fernando Bazan; Helen Berman; Darren E Casteel; Evangelos Christodoulou; John K Everett; Jens Hausmann; Tatjana Heidebrecht; Tanya Hills; Raymond Hui; John F Hunt; Jayaraman Seetharaman; Andrzej Joachimiak; Michael A Kennedy; Choel Kim; Andreas Lingel; Karolina Michalska; Gaetano T Montelione; José M Otero; Anastassis Perrakis; Juan C Pizarro; Mark J van Raaij; Theresa A Ramelot; Francois Rousseau; Liang Tong; Amy K Wernimont; Jasmine Young; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-21

2.  An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment.

Authors:  Qian Cong; Lisa N Kinch; Jimin Pei; Shuoyong Shi; Vyacheslav N Grishin; Wenlin Li; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Definition and classification of evaluation units for CASP10.

Authors:  Todd J Taylor; Chin-Hsien Tai; Yuanpeng J Huang; Jeremy Block; Hongjun Bai; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Gaetano T Montelione; Byungkook Lee
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-11-22

4.  Comparative analysis of methods for evaluation of protein models against native structures.

Authors:  Kliment Olechnovič; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Česlovas Venclovas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Recursive protein modeling: a divide and conquer strategy for Protein Structure Prediction and its case study in CASP9.

Authors:  Jianlin Cheng; Jesse Eickholt; Zheng Wang; Xin Deng
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.122

6.  CASP 11 target classification.

Authors:  Lisa N Kinch; Wenlin Li; R Dustin Schaeffer; Roland L Dunbrack; Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-01-27

7.  Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Bohdan Monastyrskyy; Krzysztof Fidelis; Anna Tramontano; Andriy Kryshtafovych
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-09-17

8.  Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Yuanpeng J Huang; Binchen Mao; James M Aramini; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

9.  The expanded FindCore method for identification of a core atom set for assessment of protein structure prediction.

Authors:  David A Snyder; Jennifer Grullon; Yuanpeng J Huang; Roberto Tejero; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

10.  Modeling proteins using a super-secondary structure library and NMR chemical shift information.

Authors:  Vilas Menon; Brinda K Vallat; Joseph M Dybas; Andras Fiser
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.