Literature DB >> 23685209

Modeling proteins using a super-secondary structure library and NMR chemical shift information.

Vilas Menon1, Brinda K Vallat, Joseph M Dybas, Andras Fiser.   

Abstract

A remaining challenge in protein modeling is to predict structures for sequences with no sequence similarity to any experimentally solved structure. Based on earlier observations, the library of protein backbone supersecondary structure motifs (Smotifs) saturated about a decade ago. Therefore, it should be possible to build any structure from a combination of existing Smotifs with the help of limited experimental data that are sufficient to relate the backbone conformations of Smotifs between target proteins and known structures. Here, we present a hybrid modeling algorithm that relies on an exhaustive Smotif library and on nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift patterns without any input of primary sequence information. In a test of 102 proteins, the algorithm delivered 90 homology-model-quality models, among them 24 high-quality ones, and a topologically correct solution for almost all cases. The current approach opens a venue to address the modeling of larger protein structures for which chemical shifts are available.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685209      PMCID: PMC3703203          DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Structure        ISSN: 0969-2126            Impact factor:   5.006


  59 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis using PHYLIP.

Authors:  J D Retief
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data.

Authors:  P M Bowers; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  J Pillardy; C Czaplewski; A Liwo; J Lee; D R Ripoll; R Kaźmierkiewicz; S Oldziej; W J Wedemeyer; K D Gibson; Y A Arnautova; J Saunders; Y J Ye; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Modeling of loops in protein structures.

Authors:  A Fiser; R K Do; A Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M A Martí-Renom; A C Stuart; A Fiser; R Sánchez; F Melo; A Sali
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2000

6.  PROSHIFT: protein chemical shift prediction using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Accurate and automated classification of protein secondary structure with PsiCSI.

Authors:  Ling-Hong Hung; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  GeneSilico protein structure prediction meta-server.

Authors:  Michal A Kurowski; Janusz M Bujnicki
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Charlie E M Strauss; Carol A Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Richard Bonneau; Ingo Ruczinski; Jerry Tsai; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  6 in total

1.  Tertiary alphabet for the observable protein structural universe.

Authors:  Craig O Mackenzie; Jianfu Zhou; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Protein structural motifs in prediction and design.

Authors:  Craig O Mackenzie; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Correlation of chemical shifts predicted by molecular dynamics simulations for partially disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jerome M Karp; Ertan Eryilmaz; Ertan Erylimaz; David Cowburn
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Development of a motif-based topology-independent structure comparison method to identify evolutionarily related folds.

Authors:  Joseph M Dybas; Andras Fiser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-11

5.  Modularity of Protein Folds as a Tool for Template-Free Modeling of Structures.

Authors:  Brinda Vallat; Carlos Madrid-Aliste; Andras Fiser
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  On the use of direct-coupling analysis with a reduced alphabet of amino acids combined with super-secondary structure motifs for protein fold prediction.

Authors:  Bernat Anton; Mireia Besalú; Oriol Fornes; Jaume Bonet; Alexis Molina; Ruben Molina-Fernandez; Gemma De Las Cuevas; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2021-04-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.