Literature DB >> 21997322

Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.

Cara E Stepp1, Yoky Matsuoka.   

Abstract

Incorporating sensory feedback with prosthetic devices is now possible, but the optimal methods of providing such feedback are still unknown. The relative utility of amplitude and pulse train frequency modulated stimulation paradigms for providing vibrotactile feedback for object manipulation was assessed in 10 participants. The two approaches were studied during virtual object manipulation using a robotic interface as a function of presentation order and a simultaneous cognitive load. Despite the potential pragmatic benefits associated with pulse train frequency modulated vibrotactile stimulation, comparison of the approach with amplitude modulation indicates that amplitude modulation vibrotactile stimulation provides superior feedback for object manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21997322      PMCID： PMC3395369          DOI： 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2170856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN： 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  18 in total

1.  Some neglected possibilities of communication.

Authors:  F A GELDARD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sensitivity of the skin to changes in rate of intermittent mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  G H MOWBRAY; J W GEBHARD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information.

Authors:  W K KIRCHNER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-04

4.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems.

Authors:  K A Kaczmarek; J G Webster; P Bach-y-Rita; W J Tompkins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation.

Authors:  Qi An; Yoky Matsuoka; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2011

6.  Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  Y Y Leung; S J Bensmaïa; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand.

Authors:  P E Patterson; J A Katz
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1992

8.  Comparison of compound and cross-modal training on postoperative visual relearning of visual decorticate rats.

Authors:  T D Tran; E R Delay
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses.

Authors:  G F Shannon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1976-05

10.  A low-cost instrumented glove for monitoring forces during object manipulation.

Authors:  M C Castro; A Cliquet
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1997-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Kristin M Quick; Jessica L Mischel; Patrick J Loughlin; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

3.  Combined Auditory and Vibrotactile Feedback for Human-Machine-Interface Control.

Authors:  Elias B Thorp; Eric Larson; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Effects of kinematic vibrotactile feedback on learning to control a virtual prosthetic arm.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Julia Manczurowsky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 5.  Neurorehabilitation in upper limb amputation: understanding how neurophysiological changes can affect functional rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.

Authors:  Andres E Pena; Liliana Rincon-Gonzalez; James J Abbas; Ranu Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Measuring mental workload in assistive wearable devices: a review.

Authors:  Charlotte Marchand; Jozina B De Graaf; Nathanaël Jarrassé
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.262
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.