Literature DB >> 940388

A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses.

G F Shannon.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1976        PMID： 940388     DOI： 10.1007/bf02478123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng        ISSN： 0025-696X


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Similarities between hearing and skin sensations.

Authors:  G VON BEKESY
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Cutaneous vibratory thresholds for square-wave electrical pulses.

Authors:  J F HAHN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Characteristics of a transducer for tactile displays.

Authors:  G F Shannon
Journal:  Biomed Eng       Date:  1974-06

4.  Artificial touch in a hand-prosthesis.

Authors:  T W Beeker; J During; A Den Hertog
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1967-01
  4 in total
  19 in total

1.  Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Yoky Matsuoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Afferent electrical nerve stimulation: human tracking performance relevant to prosthesis sensory feedback.

Authors:  A B Anani; L M Körner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Position proprioception in a microcomputer-controlled prosthesis.

Authors:  M D O'Riain; D T Gibbons
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback.

Authors:  G F Shannon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Electrical stimulation and myoelectric control. A theoretical and applied study relevant to prosthesis sensory feedback.

Authors:  C Almström; A Anani; P Herberts; L Körner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control.

Authors:  R N Scott; R H Brittain; R R Caldwell; A B Cameron; V A Dunfield
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Vibrotactile sensory substitution for object manipulation: amplitude versus pulse train frequency modulation.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Yoky Matsuoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 9.  The science of neural interface systems.

Authors:  Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  Effectiveness of supplemental grasp-force feedback in the presence of vision.

Authors:  M Zafar; C L Van Doren
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.079
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.