Literature DB >> 21991952

Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol.

Robert N Hoover1, Marianne Hyer, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Ervin Adam, Brian Bond, Andrea L Cheville, Theodore Colton, Patricia Hartge, Elizabeth E Hatch, Arthur L Herbst, Beth Y Karlan, Raymond Kaufman, Kenneth L Noller, Julie R Palmer, Stanley J Robboy, Robert C Saal, William Strohsnitter, Linda Titus-Ernstoff, Rebecca Troisi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Before 1971, several million women were exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES) given to their mothers to prevent pregnancy complications. Several adverse outcomes have been linked to such exposure, but their cumulative effects are not well understood.
METHODS: We combined data from three studies initiated in the 1970s with continued long-term follow-up of 4653 women exposed in utero to DES and 1927 unexposed controls. We assessed the risks of 12 adverse outcomes linked to DES exposure, including cumulative risks to 45 years of age for reproductive outcomes and to 55 years of age for other outcomes, and their relationships to the baseline presence or absence of vaginal epithelial changes, which are correlated with a higher dose of, and earlier exposure to, DES in utero.
RESULTS: Cumulative risks in women exposed to DES, as compared with those not exposed, were as follows: for infertility, 33.3% vs. 15.5% (hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05 to 2.75); spontaneous abortion, 50.3% vs. 38.6% (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.88); preterm delivery, 53.3% vs. 17.8% (hazard ratio, 4.68; 95% CI, 3.74 to 5.86); loss of second-trimester pregnancy, 16.4% vs. 1.7% (hazard ratio, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.56 to 5.54); ectopic pregnancy, 14.6% vs. 2.9% (hazard ratio, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.58 to 5.38); preeclampsia, 26.4% vs. 13.7% (hazard ratio 1.42; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.89); stillbirth, 8.9% vs. 2.6% (hazard ratio, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.54); early menopause, 5.1% vs. 1.7% (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.67 to 3.31); grade 2 or higher cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, 6.9% vs. 3.4% (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.59 to 3.27); and breast cancer at 40 years of age or older, 3.9% vs. 2.2% (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.18). For most outcomes, the risks among exposed women were higher for those with vaginal epithelial changes than for those without such changes.
CONCLUSIONS: In utero exposure of women to DES is associated with a high lifetime risk of a broad spectrum of adverse health outcomes. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21991952     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1013961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  127 in total

1.  DES--adverse health outcomes after in utero exposure.

Authors:  Carol Wilson
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Breast cancer following diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero: insights from a tragedy.

Authors:  Hans-Olov Adami; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  A model for breast cancer risk based on stem-cell theory.

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  The development of cervical and vaginal adenosis as a result of diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero.

Authors:  Monica M Laronda; Kenji Unno; Lindsey M Butler; Takeshi Kurita
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.880

5.  Success rates for consent and collection of prenatal biological specimens in an epidemiologic survey of child health.

Authors:  Omar A Abdul-Rahman; Beatriz Rodriguez; Sandra R Wadlinger; Julia Slutsman; Elizabeth B Boyle; Lori S Merrill; Jeffrey Botkin; Jack Moye
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-09-26

6.  Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and mammographic density.

Authors:  William C Strohsnitter; Kimberly A Bertrand; Rebecca Troisi; Christopher G Scott; Andrea L Cheville; Robert N Hoover; Julie R Palmer; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  The prenatal environment and type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  L C Stene; E A M Gale
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Size at birth and risk of breast cancer: update from a prospective population-based study.

Authors:  Marie Søfteland Sandvei; Pagona Lagiou; Pål Richard Romundstad; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Lars Johan Vatten
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Assessment of environmental knowledge and needs among assisted reproductive technology professionals.

Authors:  Annick Delvigne; Jean Vandromme
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Enigmas, priorities and opportunities in cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  Hans-Olov Adami; Olof Nyrén
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.