Literature DB >> 29658110

Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and mammographic density.

William C Strohsnitter1, Kimberly A Bertrand2, Rebecca Troisi3, Christopher G Scott4, Andrea L Cheville5, Robert N Hoover3, Julie R Palmer2, Celine M Vachon4.   

Abstract

In a prospective cohort study of the health effects associated with prenatal Diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure, DES was associated with an increased breast cancer risk after 40 years of age. It is unknown whether it is associated with greater mammographic density, which strongly predicts breast cancer risk. A cohort of DES-exposed and unexposed women was assembled at the Mayo Clinic in 1975, and followed through 2012 as part of the National Cancer Institute's DES follow-up study. Mammographic density from 3,637 mammograms for 332 (222 DES-exposed, 110 unexposed) women in this cohort screened at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 1996 and 2015 was determined clinically using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Any effect of prenatal DES exposure on mammographic density was estimated using repeated measures logistic regression. There was no association between prenatal DES exposure and high mammographic density for either premenopausal [Odds ratios (OR) = 0.92 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.50, 1.7] or postmenopausal women (OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.5). Among premenopausal women, associations differed by body mass index (BMI), with ORs of 1.47 (0.70, 3.1) for women with BMI above the median and 0.53 (0.23, 1.3) for those with BMI below the median (pinteraction  = 0.05). Overall, however, prenatal DES exposure was not associated with high mammographic density in this sample of DES Study participants. Consequently, this study does not provide evidence that high mammographic density is involved with the influence of DES on breast cancer risk.
© 2018 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast density, prospective study; diethylstilbestrol; prenatal exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29658110      PMCID: PMC7241294          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

1.  Odds per adjusted standard deviation: comparing strengths of associations for risk factors measured on different scales and across diseases and populations.

Authors:  John L Hopper
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Julie R Palmer; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Rebecca Troisi; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; William Strohsnitter; Raymond Kaufman; Arthur L Herbst; Kenneth L Noller; Marianne Hyer; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Cancer and stilbestrol. A follow-up of 1,719 persons exposed to estrogens in utero and born 1943-1959.

Authors:  A P Lanier; K L Noller; D G Decker; L R Elveback; L T Kurland
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne McTiernan; Christopher F Martin; Jennifer D Peck; Aaron K Aragaki; Rowan T Chlebowski; Etta D Pisano; C Y Wang; Robert L Brunner; Karen C Johnson; JoAnn E Manson; Cora E Lewis; Jane M Kotchen; Barbara S Hulka
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Susan E Hankinson; Graham A Colditz; Celia Byrne
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Adverse health outcomes in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  Robert N Hoover; Marianne Hyer; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Ervin Adam; Brian Bond; Andrea L Cheville; Theodore Colton; Patricia Hartge; Elizabeth E Hatch; Arthur L Herbst; Beth Y Karlan; Raymond Kaufman; Kenneth L Noller; Julie R Palmer; Stanley J Robboy; Robert C Saal; William Strohsnitter; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Rebecca Troisi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and high-grade squamous cell neoplasia of the lower genital tract.

Authors:  Rebecca Troisi; Elizabeth E Hatch; Julie R Palmer; Linda Titus; Stanley J Robboy; William C Strohsnitter; Arthur L Herbst; Ervin Adam; Marianne Hyer; Robert N Hoover
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Bisphenol A alters the development of the rhesus monkey mammary gland.

Authors:  Andrew P Tharp; Maricel V Maffini; Patricia A Hunt; Catherine A VandeVoort; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Maternal exposure to diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy and increased breast cancer risk in daughters.

Authors:  Leena Hilakivi-Clarke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Chemical Effects on Breast Development, Function, and Cancer Risk: Existing Knowledge and New Opportunities.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Bethsaida Cardona; Ruthann A Rudel; Laura N Vandenberg; Ana M Soto; Sofie Christiansen; Linda S Birnbaum; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-08-19

Review 2.  Are the Effects of DES Over? A Tragic Lesson from the Past.

Authors:  Pilar Zamora-León
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.