PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of black-blood coronary arterial wall MRI to identify the coronary artery plaque, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the golden standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients underwent IVUS and coronary artery wall MRI. Cross-sectional images were acquired on the lesion of coronary artery from the ostium to the middle segment continuously. The vessel cross-sectional area (CSA), luminal CSA, plaque burden, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured in each slice which was then compared with the IVUS images. RESULTS: Sixteen of 19 patients completed coronary artery MRA and wall imaging. 41 of 67 slices were found plaques on both IVUS and MRI; The maximal wall thickness, plaque burden, SNR, CNR in the coronary wall containing plaque were greater compared with the normal coronary wall (1.70 ± 0.51 versus 1.24 ± 0.24; 0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.12; 1.86 ± 0.41 versus 1.47 ± 0.23; 5.10 ± 2.21 versus 2.99 ± 1.17; respectively, P < 0.05). The matched MRI and IVUS showed good correlation for vessel CSA (16.77 ± 10.67 versus 16.97 ± 8.36; r = 0.79; P < 0.01), luminal CSA (5.18 ± 5.01 versus 7.13 ± 5.14; r = 0.88; P < 0.01), plaque burden (0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.15; r = 0.67; P < 0.01). in segments containing plaques, especially the luminal CSA were strongly correlated. CONCLUSION: MRI coronary artery wall imaging can identify coronary plaque in the proximal segments. It also has the potential to assess coronary artery size.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of black-blood coronary arterial wall MRI to identify the coronary artery plaque, using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the golden standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients underwent IVUS and coronary artery wall MRI. Cross-sectional images were acquired on the lesion of coronary artery from the ostium to the middle segment continuously. The vessel cross-sectional area (CSA), luminal CSA, plaque burden, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured in each slice which was then compared with the IVUS images. RESULTS: Sixteen of 19 patients completed coronary artery MRA and wall imaging. 41 of 67 slices were found plaques on both IVUS and MRI; The maximal wall thickness, plaque burden, SNR, CNR in the coronary wall containing plaque were greater compared with the normal coronary wall (1.70 ± 0.51 versus 1.24 ± 0.24; 0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.12; 1.86 ± 0.41 versus 1.47 ± 0.23; 5.10 ± 2.21 versus 2.99 ± 1.17; respectively, P < 0.05). The matched MRI and IVUS showed good correlation for vessel CSA (16.77 ± 10.67 versus 16.97 ± 8.36; r = 0.79; P < 0.01), luminal CSA (5.18 ± 5.01 versus 7.13 ± 5.14; r = 0.88; P < 0.01), plaque burden (0.71 ± 0.13 versus 0.59 ± 0.15; r = 0.67; P < 0.01). in segments containing plaques, especially the luminal CSA were strongly correlated. CONCLUSION: MRI coronary artery wall imaging can identify coronary plaque in the proximal segments. It also has the potential to assess coronary artery size.
Authors: G S Mintz; S E Nissen; W D Anderson; S R Bailey; R Erbel; P J Fitzgerald; F J Pinto; K Rosenfield; R J Siegel; E M Tuzcu; P G Yock Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: P J Scanlon; D P Faxon; A M Audet; B Carabello; G J Dehmer; K A Eagle; R D Legako; D F Leon; J A Murray; S E Nissen; C J Pepine; R M Watson; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-05-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W Yong Kim; Matthias Stuber; Peter Börnert; Kraig V Kissinger; Warren J Manning; René M Botnar Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Ge; F Chirillo; J Schwedtmann; G Görge; M Haude; D Baumgart; V Shah; C von Birgelen; S Sack; H Boudoulas; R Erbel Journal: Heart Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Z A Fayad; V Fuster; J T Fallon; T Jayasundera; S G Worthley; G Helft; J G Aguinaldo; J J Badimon; S K Sharma Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li; James C Carr Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Suzanne Gerretsen; Alfons G Kessels; Patty J Nelemans; Jouke Dijkstra; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest; Marcus Katoh; Johannes Waltenberger; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Rene M Botnar; M Eline Kooi; Tim Leiner Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eduardo Pozo; Pilar Agudo-Quilez; Antonio Rojas-González; Teresa Alvarado; María José Olivera; Luis Jesús Jiménez-Borreguero; Fernando Alfonso Journal: World J Cardiol Date: 2016-09-26
Authors: Christian H P Jansen; Divaka Perera; Andrea J Wiethoff; Alkystis Phinikaridou; Reza M Razavi; Aldo Rinaldi; Mike S Marber; Gerald F Greil; Eike Nagel; David Maintz; Simon Redwood; Rene M Botnar; Marcus R Makowski Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Constantin von Zur Mühlen; Simon Reiss; Axel J Krafft; Lisa Besch; Marius Menza; Manfred Zehender; Timo Heidt; Alexander Maier; Thomas Pfannebecker; Andreas Zirlik; Jochen Reinöhl; Peter Stachon; Ingo Hilgendorf; Dennis Wolf; Philipp Diehl; Tobias Wengenmayer; Ingo Ahrens; Christoph Bode; Michael Bock Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.240