Literature DB >> 25516859

Large bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy.

Kahraman Ulker1, Turgut Anuk1, Murat Bozkurt1, Yetkin Karasu1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopy is one of the most frequently preferred surgical options in gynecological surgery and has advantages over laparotomy, including smaller surgical scars, faster recovery, less pain and earlier return of bowel functions. Generally, it is also accepted as safe and effective and patients tolerate it well. However, it is still an intra-abdominal procedure and has the similar potential risks of laparotomy, including injury of a vital structure, bleeding and infection. Besides the well-known risks of open surgery, laparoscopy also has its own unique risks related to abdominal access methods, pneumoperitoneum created to provide adequate operative space and the energy modalities used during the procedures. Bowel, bladder or major blood vessel injuries and passage of gas into the intravascular space may result from laparoscopic surgical technique. In addition, the risks of aspiration, respiratory dysfunction and cardiovascular dysfunction increase during laparoscopy. Large bowel injuries during laparoscopy are serious complications because 50% of bowel injuries and 60% of visceral injuries are undiagnosed at the time of primary surgery. A missed or delayed diagnosis increases the risk of bowel perforation and consequently sepsis and even death. In this paper, we aim to focus on large bowel injuries that happen during gynecological laparoscopy and review their diagnostic and management options.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon; Gynecology; Intraoperative complications; Laparoscopy; Wounds and injuries

Year:  2014        PMID: 25516859      PMCID: PMC4266832          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i12.846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


  50 in total

1.  Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection.

Authors:  P A Campbell; A B Cresswell; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Lateral temperature spread of monopolar, bipolar and ultrasonic instruments for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lukas J Hefermehl; Remo A Largo; Thomas Hermanns; Cédric Poyet; Tullio Sulser; Daniel Eberli
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases.

Authors:  C Chapron; D Querleu; M A Bruhat; P Madelenat; H Fernandez; F Pierre; J B Dubuisson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S Bhoyrul; M A Vierra; C R Nezhat; T M Krummel; L W Way
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  German pelviscopic statistics for the years 1978-1982.

Authors:  H H Riedel; E Lehmann-Willenbrock; P Conrad; K Semm
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 6.  Complications of therapeutic laparoscopy.

Authors:  F Bongard; S Dubecz; S Klein
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 7.  Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: complications-how to avoid and handle.

Authors:  K A LeBlanc
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  H H Sigman; G M Fried; J Garzon; E J Hinchey; M J Wexler; J L Meakins; J S Barkun
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-08

9.  Effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum, air pneumoperitoneum, and gasless laparoscopy on body weight and tumor growth.

Authors:  N D Bouvy; M C Giuffrida; L N Tseng; E W Steyerberg; R L Marquet; H Jeekel; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-06

10.  Comparison of tubal sterilization procedures performed by keyless abdominal rope-lifting surgery and conventional CO2 laparoscopy: a case controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Kahraman Ülker; Urfettin Hüseyinoğlu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-24
View more
  4 in total

1.  [Complicated course of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  H Dralle; J Neu; F Köckerling; F Klee; M W Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Management of more frequent complications of laparoscopic surgery. Minimally invasive or always open surgery?].

Authors:  K Ludwig; U Scharlau; S Schneider Koriath
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Open Versus Closed Laparoscopy: Yet an Unresolved Controversy.

Authors:  Milan Kumar Taye; Syed Abul Fazal; David Pegu; Dayanada Saikia
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

4.  Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Dehghani Firoozabadi; Abbas Alibakhshi; Hoorieh Alaeen; Sanaz Zand; Ryan Nazemian; Maryam Rahmani
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.