Literature DB >> 29506862

Impact of hospital volume on racial disparities and outcomes for endometrial cancer.

Ama Buskwofie1, Yongmei Huang1, Ana I Tergas2, June Y Hou3, Cande V Ananth4, Alfred I Neugut5, Dawn L Hershman5, Jason D Wright6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the influence of hospital procedural volume on racial disparities for uterine cancer. We examined whether the magnitude of the survival differential between black and white women varied based on hospital procedural volume for endometrial cancer.
METHODS: We utilized the National Cancer Data Base to examine women with endometrial cancer from 1998 to 2012. Annualized hospital procedural volume was calculated and hospitals grouped into volume-based quartiles. Multivariable models were developed to examine differences in two and five-year survival between black and white women across the hospital volume categories. Patients were classified as early or advanced stage and as type I (low grade, endometrioid) or type II (high grade endometrioid, other histologies) cancers.
RESULTS: We identified 243,422 (75.0%) white and 27,764 (8.6%) black women treated at 1059 hospitals. Regardless of hospital volume, black women had decreased survival. For each tumor class, the absolute difference in adjusted two-year survival between black and white women decreased with increasing hospital volume. For example, for women with early-stage, type I tumors, the adjusted two-year survival differential between blacks and whites was -1.4% (95%CI, -2.4 to -0.5%) at low volume centers and decreased to -0.5% (95%CI, -0.9 to 0%) at high-volume hospitals (P<0.0001). For advanced stage, type I tumors, the adjusted survival differential decreased from -12.4% (95%CI, -24.0 to -0.9%) to 1.2% (95%CI, -2.9 to 5.3%) at high volume hospitals (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Black race is an independent predictor of mortality. The impact of race on mortality is mitigated, albeit not eliminated, by increasing hospital volume.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Black; Disparities; Endometrial cancer; Hysterectomy; Uterine cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29506862      PMCID: PMC5915905          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  30 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Procedure volume as a predictor of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Jing Cao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Effects of surgical volumes on the survival of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Becker; N P M Ezendam; D Boll; M van der Aa; J M A Pijnenborg
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  A SAS macro for estimation of direct adjusted survival curves based on a stratified Cox regression model.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Fausto R Loberiza; John P Klein; Mei-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Association of Hospital Volume With Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Shitanshu Uppal; Christina Chapman; Ryan J Spencer; Shruti Jolly; Kate Maturen; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Marcela G delCarmen; Laurel W Rice
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Influence of surgical volume on outcome for laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Dawn L Hershman; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Sharyn N Lewin; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Comparison of 2 methods for calculating adjusted survival curves from proportional hazards models.

Authors:  W A Ghali; H Quan; R Brant; G van Melle; C M Norris; P D Faris; P D Galbraith; M L Knudtson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Endometrial cancer: socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic differences in stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival.

Authors:  Terri Madison; David Schottenfeld; Sherman A James; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Effect of surgical volume on morbidity and mortality of abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Sharyn N Lewin; Israel Deutsch; William M Burke; Xuming Sun; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Impact of surgeon and hospital ovarian cancer surgical case volume on in-hospital mortality and related short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Marianna L Zahurak; Teresa P Diaz-Montes; Robert L Giuntoli; Deborah K Armstrong
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes of fertility-sparing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: A national study in the United States.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Shinya Matsuzaki; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Kazuhide Matsushima; Maximilian Klar; Brendan H Grubbs; Lynda D Roman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Acceptability of quality indicators for the management of endometrial, cervical and ovarian cancer: results of an online survey.

Authors:  Annemie Luyckx; Leen Wyckmans; Anne-Sophie Bonte; Xuan Bich Trinh; Peter A van Dam
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.809

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.