BACKGROUND: Modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) account for much of the variability in CVD outcomes and are also related to psychosocial variables. There is evidence that depression can undermine the treatment and advance the progression of CVD risk factors, suggesting that CVD risk factor relationships with CVD events may differ among those with depression. METHODS: This study tracked CVD events and mortality over a median of 5.9 years among a prospective cohort of 620 women (mean age 59.6 years [11.6]) completing a diagnostic protocol including coronary angiography and CVD risk factor assessment. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The study outcome was combined cardiovascular mortality and events. RESULTS: Over the follow-up interval, 16.1% of the sample experienced one or more of the cardiovascular outcomes. In separate Cox regression models adjusting for age, education history, ethnicity, and coronary angiogram scores, we observed statistically significant CVD risk factor × BDI score interactions for diabetes, smoking, and waist-hip ratio factors. Simple effect analyses indicated that diabetes and smoking status were more strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes among participants with lower BDI scores, whereas waist-hip ratio values predicted outcomes only among those with higher BDI scores. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the relationship between modifiable CVD risk factors and CVD outcomes may vary with depression status in clinical samples of women. This evidence augments prior research by demonstrating that depression may influence CVD risk jointly with or independent of CVD risk factors. It also provides further support for the inclusion of depression assessment in cardiovascular clinic settings.
BACKGROUND: Modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) account for much of the variability in CVD outcomes and are also related to psychosocial variables. There is evidence that depression can undermine the treatment and advance the progression of CVD risk factors, suggesting that CVD risk factor relationships with CVD events may differ among those with depression. METHODS: This study tracked CVD events and mortality over a median of 5.9 years among a prospective cohort of 620 women (mean age 59.6 years [11.6]) completing a diagnostic protocol including coronary angiography and CVD risk factor assessment. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The study outcome was combined cardiovascular mortality and events. RESULTS: Over the follow-up interval, 16.1% of the sample experienced one or more of the cardiovascular outcomes. In separate Cox regression models adjusting for age, education history, ethnicity, and coronary angiogram scores, we observed statistically significant CVD risk factor × BDI score interactions for diabetes, smoking, and waist-hip ratio factors. Simple effect analyses indicated that diabetes and smoking status were more strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes among participants with lower BDI scores, whereas waist-hip ratio values predicted outcomes only among those with higher BDI scores. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the relationship between modifiable CVD risk factors and CVD outcomes may vary with depression status in clinical samples of women. This evidence augments prior research by demonstrating that depression may influence CVD risk jointly with or independent of CVD risk factors. It also provides further support for the inclusion of depression assessment in cardiovascular clinic settings.
Authors: Salim Yusuf; Steven Hawken; Stephanie Ounpuu; Leonelo Bautista; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Patrick Commerford; Chim C Lang; Zvonko Rumboldt; Churchill L Onen; Liu Lisheng; Supachai Tanomsup; Paul Wangai; Fahad Razak; Arya M Sharma; Sonia S Anand Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-11-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert E Feinstein; Michael Blumenfield; Barbara Orlowski; William H Frishman; Simon Ovanessian Journal: Cardiol Rev Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.644
Authors: Umesh N Khot; Monica B Khot; Christopher T Bajzer; Shelly K Sapp; E Magnus Ohman; Sorin J Brener; Stephen G Ellis; A Michael Lincoff; Eric J Topol Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-08-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anne Herva; Pirkko Räsänen; Jouko Miettunen; Markku Timonen; Kristian Läksy; Juha Veijola; Jaana Laitinen; Aimo Ruokonen; Matti Joukamaa Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Eileen M Handberg; Jo-Ann Eastwood; Wafia Eteiba; B Delia Johnson; David S Krantz; Diane V Thompson; Viola Vaccarino; Vera Bittner; George Sopko; Carl J Pepine; Noel Bairey Merz; Thomas R Rutledge Journal: Womens Health (Lond) Date: 2013-09
Authors: Tam Truong Donnelly; Jassim Mohd Al Suwaidi; Awad Al-Qahtani; Nidal Asaad; Najlaa Abdul Qader; Rajvir Singh; Tak Shing Fung; Irem Mueed; Shima Sharara; Noha El Banna; Sarah Omar Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2015-08
Authors: Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Elva M Arredondo; JianWen Cai; Sheila F Castaneda; James P Choca; Linda C Gallo; Molly Jung; Lisa M LaVange; Elizabeth T Lee-Rey; Thomas Mosley; Frank J Penedo; Daniel A Santistaban; Phyllis C Zee Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Zsuzsanna Cserép; Eszter Losoncz; Piroska Balog; Tamás Szili-Török; András Husz; Boglárka Juhász; Miklós D Kertai; János Gál; Andrea Székely Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 1.637
Authors: Allison J Carroll; Mark D Huffman; Lihui Zhao; David R Jacobs; Jesse C Stewart; Catarina I Kiefe; Wendy Brunner; Kiang Liu; Brian Hitsman Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 6.533