Literature DB >> 21987824

Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory.

Eva Feredoes1, Klaartje Heinen, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Christian Ruff, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is recruited during visual working memory (WM) when relevant information must be maintained in the presence of distracting information. The mechanism by which DLPFC might ensure successful maintenance of the contents of WM is, however, unclear; it might enhance neural maintenance of memory targets or suppress processing of distracters. To adjudicate between these possibilities, we applied time-locked transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during functional MRI, an approach that permits causal assessment of a stimulated brain region's influence on connected brain regions, and evaluated how this influence may change under different task conditions. Participants performed a visual WM task requiring retention of visual stimuli (faces or houses) across a delay during which visual distracters could be present or absent. When distracters were present, they were always from the opposite stimulus category, so that targets and distracters were represented in distinct posterior cortical areas. We then measured whether DLPFC-TMS, administered in the delay at the time point when distracters could appear, would modulate posterior regions representing memory targets or distracters. We found that DLPFC-TMS influenced posterior areas only when distracters were present and, critically, that this influence consisted of increased activity in regions representing the current memory targets. DLPFC-TMS did not affect regions representing current distracters. These results provide a new line of causal evidence for a top-down DLPFC-based control mechanism that promotes successful maintenance of relevant information in WM in the presence of distraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987824      PMCID: PMC3198359          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1106439108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory.

Authors:  K Sakai; J B Rowe; R E Passingham
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex: one function is sensory gating.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Mechanisms of working memory disruption by external interference.

Authors:  Wesley C Clapp; Michael T Rubens; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  The neural bases of the short-term storage of verbal information are anatomically variable across individuals.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Studying the role of human parietal cortex in visuospatial attention with concurrent TMS-fMRI.

Authors:  Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Sven Bestmann; Otto Bjoertomt; Oliver Josephs; Ralf Deichmann; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Michael T Rubens; Arul Thangavel; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Dorsal premotor cortex exerts state-dependent causal influences on activity in contralateral primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Orlando Swayne; Felix Blankenburg; Christian C Ruff; Patrick Haggard; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Oliver Josephs; Jon Driver; John C Rothwell; Nick S Ward
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  69 in total

1.  Working memory maintenance is sufficient to reduce state anxiety.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; David Quispe-Escudero; Elizabeth Hale; Andrew Davis; Katherine O'Connell; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Impaired prefrontal functional connectivity associated with working memory task performance and disorganization despite intact activations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Sripriya Chari; Michael J Minzenberg; Marjorie Solomon; J Daniel Ragland; Quynh Nguyen; Cameron S Carter; Jong H Yoon
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 3.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

4.  Co-Activation-Based Parcellation of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Delineates the Inferior Frontal Junction Area.

Authors:  Paul S Muhle-Karbe; Jan Derrfuss; Margaret T Lynn; Franz X Neubert; Peter T Fox; Marcel Brass; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Re-evaluating the relationships among filtering activity, unnecessary storage, and visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Michael A Busseri
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Neural activity during working memory encoding, maintenance, and retrieval: A network-based model and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Characterizing the Impact of Distracting Input on Visual Working Memory Representations.

Authors:  Doris Pischedda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory.

Authors:  Mark D'Esposito; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 9.  Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Clayton E Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Working Memory and Decision-Making in a Frontoparietal Circuit Model.

Authors:  John D Murray; Jorge Jaramillo; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.