Literature DB >> 15191279

A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography.

Sheila Timp1, Nico Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

Mass segmentation plays a crucial role in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems for classification of suspicious regions as normal, benign, or malignant. In this article we present a robust and automated segmentation technique--based on dynamic programming--to segment mass lesions from surrounding tissue. In addition, we propose an efficient algorithm to guarantee resulting contours to be closed. The segmentation method based on dynamic programming was quantitatively compared with two other automated segmentation methods (region growing and the discrete contour model) on a dataset of 1210 masses. For each mass an overlap criterion was calculated to determine the similarity with manual segmentation. The mean overlap percentage for dynamic programming was 0.69, for the other two methods 0.60 and 0.59, respectively. The difference in overlap percentage was statistically significant. To study the influence of the segmentation method on the performance of a CAD system two additional experiments were carried out. The first experiment studied the detection performance of the CAD system for the different segmentation methods. Free-response receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the detection performance was nearly identical for the three segmentation methods. In the second experiment the ability of the classifier to discriminate between malignant and benign lesions was studied. For region based evaluation the area Az under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.74 for dynamic programming, 0.72 for the discrete contour model, and 0.67 for region growing. The difference in Az values obtained by the dynamic programming method and region growing was statistically significant. The differences between other methods were not significant.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15191279     DOI: 10.1118/1.1688039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Automated lung segmentation in digital chest tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Jiahui Wang; James T Dobbins; Qiang Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Breast masses detection using phase portrait analysis and fuzzy inference systems.

Authors:  Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Radial-searching contour extraction method based on a modified active contour model for mammographic masses.

Authors:  Toshiaki Nakagawa; Takeshi Hara; Hiroshi Fujita; Katsuhei Horita; Takuji Iwase; Tokiko Endo
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-05-08

4.  Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Ge; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Alexis Nees; Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei; Chuan Zhou; Yiheng Zhang; Jing Cui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Level set segmentation of breast masses in contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT and evaluation of stopping criteria.

Authors:  Hsien-Chi Kuo; Maryellen L Giger; Ingrid Reiser; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors; Kai Yang; Alexandra Edwards
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Mammogram segmentation using maximal cell strength updation in cellular automata.

Authors:  J Anitha; J Dinesh Peter
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Marker-controlled watershed for lesion segmentation in mammograms.

Authors:  Shengzhou Xu; Hong Liu; Enmin Song
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Dynamic Programming Using Polar Variance for Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Jose A Rosado-Toro; Maria I Altbach; Jeffrey J Rodriguez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 10.  Advances in computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lubomir Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.