Literature DB >> 16964885

A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.

R Bellotti1, F De Carlo, S Tangaro, G Gargano, G Maggipinto, M Castellano, R Massafra, D Cascio, F Fauci, R Magro, G Raso, A Lauria, G Forni, S Bagnasco, P Cerello, E Zanon, S C Cheran, E Lopez Torres, U Bottigli, G L Masala, P Oliva, A Retico, M E Fantacci, R Cataldo, I De Mitri, G De Nunzio.   

Abstract

Mass localization plays a crucial role in computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for the classification of suspicious regions in mammograms. In this article we present a completely automated classification system for the detection of masses in digitized mammographic images. The tool system we discuss consists in three processing levels: (a) Image segmentation for the localization of regions of interest (ROIs). This step relies on an iterative dynamical threshold algorithm able to select iso-intensity closed contours around gray level maxima of the mammogram. (b) ROI characterization by means of textural features computed from the gray tone spatial dependence matrix (GTSDM), containing second-order spatial statistics information on the pixel gray level intensity. As the images under study were recorded in different centers and with different machine settings, eight GTSDM features were selected so as to be invariant under monotonic transformation. In this way, the images do not need to be normalized, as the adopted features depend on the texture only, rather than on the gray tone levels, too. (c) ROI classification by means of a neural network, with supervision provided by the radiologist's diagnosis. The CAD system was evaluated on a large database of 3369 mammographic images [2307 negative, 1062 pathological (or positive), containing at least one confirmed mass, as diagnosed by an expert radiologist]. To assess the performance of the system, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and free-response ROC analysis were employed. The area under the ROC curve was found to be Az = 0.783 +/- 0.008 for the ROI-based classification. When evaluating the accuracy of the CAD against the radiologist-drawn boundaries, 4.23 false positives per image are found at 80% of mass sensitivity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16964885     DOI: 10.1118/1.2214177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Breast masses detection using phase portrait analysis and fuzzy inference systems.

Authors:  Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  MAGIC-5: an Italian mammographic database of digitised images for research.

Authors:  S Tangaro; R Bellotti; F De Carlo; G Gargano; E Lattanzio; P Monno; R Massafra; P Delogu; M E Fantacci; A Retico; M Bazzocchi; S Bagnasco; P Cerello; S C Cheran; E Lopez Torres; E Zanon; A Lauria; A Sodano; D Cascio; F Fauci; R Magro; G Raso; R Ienzi; U Bottigli; G L Masala; P Oliva; G Meloni; A P Caricato; R Cataldo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters.

Authors:  Paulina E Galavis; Christian Hollensen; Ngoneh Jallow; Bhudatt Paliwal; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  A computer-aided approach for automatic detection of breast masses in digital mammogram via spectral clustering and support vector machine.

Authors:  Hossein Ketabi; Ali Ekhlasi; Hessam Ahmadi
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-02-12

5.  Automatic lung segmentation in CT images with accurate handling of the hilar region.

Authors:  Giorgio De Nunzio; Eleonora Tommasi; Antonella Agrusti; Rosella Cataldo; Ivan De Mitri; Marco Favetta; Silvio Maglio; Andrea Massafra; Maurizio Quarta; Massimo Torsello; Ilaria Zecca; Roberto Bellotti; Sabina Tangaro; Piero Calvini; Niccolò Camarlinghi; Fabio Falaschi; Piergiorgio Cerello; Piernicola Oliva
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Sang Cheol Park; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Evaluating computer-aided detection algorithms.

Authors:  Hong Jun Yoon; Bin Zheng; Berkman Sahiner; Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Feature Selection Based on Machine Learning in MRIs for Hippocampal Segmentation.

Authors:  Sabina Tangaro; Nicola Amoroso; Massimo Brescia; Stefano Cavuoti; Andrea Chincarini; Rosangela Errico; Paolo Inglese; Giuseppe Longo; Rosalia Maglietta; Andrea Tateo; Giuseppe Riccio; Roberto Bellotti
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Mammographic images segmentation based on chaotic map clustering algorithm.

Authors:  Marius Iacomi; Donato Cascio; Francesco Fauci; Giuseppe Raso
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Detection of masses in mammograms using a one-stage object detector based on a deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Hwejin Jung; Bumsoo Kim; Inyeop Lee; Minhwan Yoo; Junhyun Lee; Sooyoun Ham; Okhee Woo; Jaewoo Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.