Literature DB >> 21982313

Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces left atrial volume and the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).

Andrew Brenyo1, Mark S Link, Alon Barsheshet, Arthur J Moss, Wojciech Zareba, Paul J Wang, Scott McNitt, David Huang, Elyse Foster, Mark Estes, Scott D Solomon, Ilan Goldenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that reductions in left atrial volume (LAV) with a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) would translate into a subsequent reduction in the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT).
BACKGROUND: There is limited information regarding the effect of CRT-D on the risk of AT.
METHODS: Percent reduction in LAV at 1 year following CRT-D implantation (pre-specified as low [lowest quartile: <20% reduction in LAV] and high [≥20% reduction in LAV] response to CRT-D) were related to the risk of subsequent AT (comprising atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias) among patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).
RESULTS: The cumulative probability of AT 2.5 years after assessment of echocardiographic response was lowest among high LAV responders to CRT-D (3%) and significantly higher among both low LAV responders to CRT-D (9%) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-only patients (7%; p = 0.03 for the difference among the 3 groups). Consistently, multivariate analysis showed that high LAV responders to CRT-D experienced a significant 53% (p = 0.01) reduction in the risk of subsequent AT as compared with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-only patients, whereas low LAV responders did not derive a significant risk reduction with CRT-D therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54 to 2.00]; p = 0.89). Patients who developed in-trial AT experienced significant increases in the risk for both the combined endpoint of heart failure or death (HR: 2.28 [95% CI: 1.45 to 3.59]; p < 0.001) and the separate occurrence of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.89 [95% CI: 1.08 to 3.62]; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In the MADIT-CRT study, favorable reverse remodeling of the left atrium with CRT-D therapy was associated with a significant reduction in risk of subsequent AT. (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [MADIT-CRT]; NCT00180271).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982313     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  22 in total

1.  Effect of periodic pacemaker optimization on left atrial reverse remodeling in long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Guangwei Pan; Zhiqiang Liu; Pengyi He; Yuchun Yang; Yuming Mu; Wei Han; Muhuyati Wulasihan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Nonpharmacological Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: What Is the Role of Device Therapy?

Authors:  Lucie Riedlbauchová; Václav Durdil; Jakub Honěk; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-04-28

3.  Advanced Interatrial Block Predicts New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Severe Heart Failure and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Fariha Sadiq Ali; Andres Enriquez; Diego Conde; Damian Redfearn; Kevin Michael; Christopher Simpson; Hoshiar Abdollah; Antoni Bayés de Luna; Wilma Hopman; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Standard chest radiograph predicts left ventricular lead location in chronic resynchronization therapy patients more accurately than intraoperative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Jay E Tiongson; Sebastian Obrzut; Martin B McDaniel; Hsin-Yi Chang; Jigar Patel; Paul J Friedman; Gregory K Feld; Ulrika M Birgersdotter-Green
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Device Management in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Brett G Angel; Heath Saltzman; Luke S Kusmirek
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Adverse Outcomes from Atrial Fibrillation;Mechanisms, Risks, and Insights Learned from Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  David L Johnson; John D Day; Srijoy Mahapatra; T Jared Bunch
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-02-02

Review 7.  Is cardiac resynchronization therapy an antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul L Hess; Kevin P Jackson; Vic Hasselblad; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Left atrial size and function as assessed by computed tomography in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Association to echocardiographic and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Peter Bomholt Hansen; Anders Sommer; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard; Mads Brix Kronborg; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Atrial fibrillation in heart failure.

Authors:  Rasmus Havmöller; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-12

Review 10.  Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.