INTRODUCTION: Targeting the proper left ventricular lead site is important in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures, as suboptimal lead locations may result in a lack of clinical response. Left ventricular lead locations are typically confirmed using fluoroscopy (fluoro) with AP, RAO, and LAO orientations. However, standard fluoro may inadequately delineate true left ventricular lead locations, due to insufficient angulation or extreme cardiac rotation. Posteroanterior and lateral chest radiograph (CXRPAL), performed routinely to verify lead stability and freedom from complication, may better confirm left ventricular lead location due to utilization of a straight lateral view. HYPOTHESIS: Compared to fluoro, lead localization using CXRPAL will be more predictive of true left ventricular lead location in CRT patients. METHODS: Of 252 medically optimized CHF patients who underwent CRT implantation by multiple operators from October 2001 to August 2011, 46 (mean age, 58.9 ± 13.2 years; 10 female; 19 ICM; 19 LBBB; mean ejection fraction, 26.6 ± 8.9 %; mean QRS width, 144.4 ms) had CT scanning performed as part of routine medical care and comprise this study. Operative reports of left ventricular lead location by fluoro were reviewed. Left ventricular lead location was identified on CXRPAL by three independent observers blinded to operative results. Left ventricular lead locations according to fluoro and CXRPAL were correlated with CT scan at a mean follow-up of 57.6 ± 28.8 months (Tables 1 and 2). RESULTS: Compared to standard fluoro, CXRPAL agreed better with CT scan (κ = 0.413 fluoro vs. κ = 0.864 CXRPAL on the vertical axis, and κ = 0.086 fluoro vs. κ = 0.864 CXRPAL on the horizontal axis) for identification of left ventricular lead location. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study of 46 CRT patients, interpretation of left ventricular lead location using CXRPAL correlated better with true lead location identified on CT scan, compared to standard fluoroscopy. Use of a steep lateral view during CRT implantation may be necessary to accurately identify left ventricular lead locations.
INTRODUCTION: Targeting the proper left ventricular lead site is important in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) procedures, as suboptimal lead locations may result in a lack of clinical response. Left ventricular lead locations are typically confirmed using fluoroscopy (fluoro) with AP, RAO, and LAO orientations. However, standard fluoro may inadequately delineate true left ventricular lead locations, due to insufficient angulation or extreme cardiac rotation. Posteroanterior and lateral chest radiograph (CXRPAL), performed routinely to verify lead stability and freedom from complication, may better confirm left ventricular lead location due to utilization of a straight lateral view. HYPOTHESIS: Compared to fluoro, lead localization using CXRPAL will be more predictive of true left ventricular lead location in CRT patients. METHODS: Of 252 medically optimized CHFpatients who underwent CRT implantation by multiple operators from October 2001 to August 2011, 46 (mean age, 58.9 ± 13.2 years; 10 female; 19 ICM; 19 LBBB; mean ejection fraction, 26.6 ± 8.9 %; mean QRS width, 144.4 ms) had CT scanning performed as part of routine medical care and comprise this study. Operative reports of left ventricular lead location by fluoro were reviewed. Left ventricular lead location was identified on CXRPAL by three independent observers blinded to operative results. Left ventricular lead locations according to fluoro and CXRPAL were correlated with CT scan at a mean follow-up of 57.6 ± 28.8 months (Tables 1 and 2). RESULTS: Compared to standard fluoro, CXRPAL agreed better with CT scan (κ = 0.413 fluoro vs. κ = 0.864 CXRPAL on the vertical axis, and κ = 0.086 fluoro vs. κ = 0.864 CXRPAL on the horizontal axis) for identification of left ventricular lead location. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study of 46 CRT patients, interpretation of left ventricular lead location using CXRPAL correlated better with true lead location identified on CT scan, compared to standard fluoroscopy. Use of a steep lateral view during CRT implantation may be necessary to accurately identify left ventricular lead locations.
Authors: William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-06-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Margot D Bogaard; Pieter A Doevendans; Geert E Leenders; Peter Loh; Richard N W Hauer; Harry van Wessel; Mathias Meine Journal: Europace Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Aleksandr Rovner; Lisa de Las Fuentes; Mitchell N Faddis; Marye J Gleva; Victor G Dávila-Román; Alan D Waggoner Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Leslie A Saxon; Brian Olshansky; Kent Volosin; Jonathan S Steinberg; Byron K Lee; Gery Tomassoni; Thomas Guarnieri; Anupama Rao; Patrick Yong; Elizabeth Galle; Jill Leigh; Fred Ecklund; Michael R Bristow Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2009-02-27
Authors: I Lozano; M Bocchiardo; M Achtelik; F Gaita; H J Trappe; E Daoud; J Hummel; C Duby; P Yong Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Antonio Rossillo; Atul Verma; Eduardo B Saad; Andrea Corrado; Gianni Gasparini; Nassir F Marrouche; Ali Reza Golshayan; Richard McCurdy; Mandeep Bhargava; Yaariv Khaykin; J David Burkhardt; David O Martin; Bruce L Wilkoff; Walid I Saliba; Robert A Schweikert; Antonio Raviele; Andrea Natale Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2004-10
Authors: John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael Becker; Rafael Kramann; Andreas Franke; Ole-A Breithardt; Nicole Heussen; Christian Knackstedt; Christoph Stellbrink; Patrick Schauerte; Malte Kelm; Rainer Hoffmann Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 29.983