Literature DB >> 32476811

Nonpharmacological Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: What Is the Role of Device Therapy?

Lucie Riedlbauchová1,2, Václav Durdil1,2, Jakub Honěk1,2, Josef Veselka1,2.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in the adult population, and its incidence and prevalence are still rising. Cardiac devices are widely used in clinical practice in the management of various rhythm disturbances and heart failure treatment. Many patients who receive a pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or cardiac resynchronization therapy also experience atrial fibrillation in the course of their life. Therefore, this review aims to describe the role of these devices in the treatment and prevention of atrial fibrillation in the device recipients. In addition, all these implantable devices also serve as permanent ECG (electrocardiogram) monitors, thus providing important information about the presence and characteristics of atrial fibrillation that may or may not be detected by the patient but can modify our therapeutical approach with regard to the stroke prevention. © Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AV junctional ablation; ICD; atrial fibrillation; cardiac pacing; cardiac resynchronization; heart failure; sick sinus syndrome

Year:  2020        PMID: 32476811      PMCID: PMC7250633          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  77 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes after ablation and pacing therapy for atrial fibrillation : a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M A Wood; C Brown-Mahoney; G N Kay; K A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Ventricular rate and beat-to-beat variation of stroke volume in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A J Kerr; M J Williams; R A Stewart
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol.

Authors:  H F Tse; C P Lau; G M Ayers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation.

Authors:  Laurens F Tops; Martin J Schalij; Eduard R Holman; Lieselot van Erven; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Role of AV nodal ablation in cardiac resynchronization in patients with coexistent atrial fibrillation and heart failure a systematic review.

Authors:  Anand N Ganesan; Anthony G Brooks; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Dennis H Lau; Jonathan M Kalman; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Long-term effects of biatrial synchronous pacing to prevent drug-refractory atrial tachyarrhythmia: a nine-year experience.

Authors:  G R D'Allonnes; D Pavin; C Leclercq; J E Ecke; G Jauvert; P Mabo; J C Daubert
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-10

7.  Biventricular pacing preserves left ventricular performance in patients with high-grade atrio-ventricular block: a randomized comparison with DDD(R) pacing in 50 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Andi E Albertsen; Jens C Nielsen; Steen H Poulsen; Peter T Mortensen; Anders K Pedersen; Peter S Hansen; Henrik K Jensen; Henrik Egeblad
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Incidence of atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism in a randomised trial of atrial versus dual chamber pacing in 177 patients with sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  L Kristensen; J C Nielsen; P T Mortensen; O L Pedersen; A K Pedersen; H R Andersen
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison.

Authors:  Andi Eie Albertsen; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen; Peter Thomas Mortensen; Anders Kirstein Pedersen; Peter Steen Hansen; Henrik Kjaerulf Jensen; Henrik Egeblad
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  The European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey.

Authors:  Kenneth Dickstein; Nigussie Bogale; Silvia Priori; Angelo Auricchio; John G Cleland; Anselm Gitt; Tobias Limbourg; Cecilia Linde; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Josep Brugada
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.