Literature DB >> 21979051

Endonuclease G is a novel determinant of cardiac hypertrophy and mitochondrial function.

Chris McDermott-Roe1, Junmei Ye, Rizwan Ahmed, Xi-Ming Sun, Anna Serafín, James Ware, Leonardo Bottolo, Phil Muckett, Xavier Cañas, Jisheng Zhang, Glenn C Rowe, Rachel Buchan, Han Lu, Adam Braithwaite, Massimiliano Mancini, David Hauton, Ramon Martí, Elena García-Arumí, Norbert Hubner, Howard Jacob, Tadao Serikawa, Vaclav Zidek, Frantisek Papousek, Frantisek Kolar, Maria Cardona, Marisol Ruiz-Meana, David García-Dorado, Joan X Comella, Leanne E Felkin, Paul J R Barton, Zoltan Arany, Michal Pravenec, Enrico Petretto, Daniel Sanchis, Stuart A Cook.   

Abstract

Left ventricular mass (LVM) is a highly heritable trait and an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality. So far, genome-wide association studies have not identified the genetic factors that underlie LVM variation, and the regulatory mechanisms for blood-pressure-independent cardiac hypertrophy remain poorly understood. Unbiased systems genetics approaches in the rat now provide a powerful complementary tool to genome-wide association studies, and we applied integrative genomics to dissect a highly replicated, blood-pressure-independent LVM locus on rat chromosome 3p. Here we identified endonuclease G (Endog), which previously was implicated in apoptosis but not hypertrophy, as the gene at the locus, and we found a loss-of-function mutation in Endog that is associated with increased LVM and impaired cardiac function. Inhibition of Endog in cultured cardiomyocytes resulted in an increase in cell size and hypertrophic biomarkers in the absence of pro-hypertrophic stimulation. Genome-wide network analysis unexpectedly implicated ENDOG in fundamental mitochondrial processes that are unrelated to apoptosis. We showed direct regulation of ENDOG by ERR-α and PGC1α (which are master regulators of mitochondrial and cardiac function), interaction of ENDOG with the mitochondrial genome and ENDOG-mediated regulation of mitochondrial mass. At baseline, the Endog-deleted mouse heart had depleted mitochondria, mitochondrial dysfunction and elevated levels of reactive oxygen species, which were associated with enlarged and steatotic cardiomyocytes. Our study has further established the link between mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive oxygen species and heart disease and has uncovered a role for Endog in maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21979051      PMCID: PMC3189541          DOI: 10.1038/nature10490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


Elevated left ventricular mass (LVM) is a clinically important trait that independently predicts the risk of heart failure, sudden death and all-cause mortality[2]. Although LVM is a heritable complex trait[1], large genome wide association studies (GWASs) have not identified new LVM genes[3]. Blood pressure (BP)-dependent regulation of LVM, which is perhaps surprisingly limited[7], has been studied extensively in model systems and acts through well-characterised and overlapping signalling modules[12]. In contrast, the pathways underlying BP-independent cardiac hypertrophy, commonly seen in obesity and type 2 diabetes and related to mitochondrial dysfunction and liptoxicity[4,5], remain largely unknown. Here, we took advantage of the recent step-changes in integrative systems-genetics approaches in the rat[6,7] to dissect a BP-independent cardiac mass quantitative trait locus (QTL) and identified the causative gene and underlying mechanism. The rat is unique for the study of cardiac mass with over 75 QTLs identified for this trait (rat genome database; http://rgd.mcw.edu/). Rat chromosome 3p (0-25Mbp) contains a highly replicated and BP-independent QTL for cardiac mass, which was mapped in crosses of the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat (SHR) or SHR Stoke Prone (SHRSP) to Wistar Kyoto (WKY) or Salt Sensitive (SS)[13,14]. To dissect genetically this locus, we generated an F2 intercross from SHR and Brown Norway (BN) strains and replicated further the LVM QTL (LOD=4.2) (Fig. 1a). We confirmed the BP-independent QTL effect in a congenic strain (SHR.BN-(3L)) that had lower LVM and smaller cardiomyocytes than the SHR (Fig. 1b,c) and refined the QTL region (6.4Mbp-11.2Mpb) using a second congenic strain (SHR.BN-(3S)) (Supplementary Fig. 1). In the F2 cross, in the SHR.BN-(3L) strain and in previous experimental crosses[13,14], the SHR allele at the locus was associated with increased cardiac mass and this effect was BP-independent (Fig. 1a and d). Functional assessment in vivo revealed that the SHR.BN-(3L) strain had better cardiac performance at baseline and following stimulation, as compared to the SHR (Supplementary Fig. 1). These data demonstrate that an SHR allele at the cardiac mass QTL on rat chromosome 3p increases LVM and adversely affects cardiac function.
Figure 1

Positional cloning of Endog as the gene underlying the rat chromosome 3p cardiac mass quantitative trait locus (QTL)

a, Mapping of heart weight (HW) and left ventricular mass (LVM) corrected for body weight (BW) to chromosome 3p in the Brown Norway (BN) x Spontaneously Hypertensive (SHR) F2 population. The telomeric limits of the congenic strains (SHR.BN-(3L) and SHR.BN-(3S)) and the previously mapped cardiac mass (CM) QTLs[13,14] are shown; x-axis, physical position in Mbp. b, HW indexed to BW in the SHR (n=4) and the SHR.BN-(3L) congenic strains (n=5). c, Relative cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area in SHR and SHR.BN-(3L) congenic strains. d, In vivo telemetric systolic- and diastolic-blood pressure (SBP and DBP) measurements in the SHR (red circles) and SHR.BN-(3L) (black circles) (n=8 per genotype). e, Haplotype analysis of the refined QTL region. SNPs are depicted with reference to WKY/NCrl alleles (grey, identical; white, dissimilar) with numbers (1-5) denoting the polymorphic regions between strains with either high or low HW. QPCR of Endog mRNA expression (f) and immunoblot of Endog protein expression (g) in strains with low or high CM at the chromosome 3p locus. h, Nuclease activity in BN and SHR heart extracts over a range of cardiac protein extract amounts (grey wedge) (Supplementary Methods). i, Reversal of nuclease activity in cardiac lysates by a drosophila-derived inhibitor of Endog[18] (range 1500nM-1.5nM, grey wedge). j, Association of the Endog indel with loss of Endog protein expression and diminished nuclease activity in the recombinant inbred (RI) strains. Upper, middle and lower panels display the DNA indel, protein expression and nuclease activity, respectively. k, Linkage mapping of nuclease activity in RI strains using a quantitative fluorescence-based assay (Supplementary Methods). All data are represented as mean+s.e.m. *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001.

We used the new genotypes generated in our F2 cross and those from previous experiments[13,14] to refine the QTL region, and identified five distinct loci (spanning 750kbp in total) that co-segregated with the haplotypes associated with LVM variation (Fig. 1e). Endonuclease G (Endog), which we had previously shown to be cis-regulated in the heart (P=3×10−6)[7], was the only gene at the loci to be differentially regulated with consistent direction of effect in the SHR and SHRSP heart as compared to the WKY heart (Supplementary Table 1). Endog is a nuclear-encoded, mitochondrial-localised nuclease with a proposed but disputed function in apoptosis[8,15,16,17] and no known effect on cardiac mass or function. We observed reduced expression of Endog transcript and lack of Endog protein in all strains with elevated cardiac mass (Fig. 1f and g). Sequencing of Endog revealed promoter and coding sequence variation and we identified an SHR-specific, frameshift-causing insertion in Endog exon one that was associated with increased heart weight and LVM (Supplementary Fig. 2). There was marked reduction in cardiac nuclease activity, which was Endog-dependent[18], in SHR heart as compared to BN heart (Fig. 1h and i). In recombinant inbred strains derived from the SHR and BN[6,7] we confirmed the direct relationship between the SHR insertion and the lack of nuclease activity (Fig. 1j) and mapped Endog-dependent nuclease activity to a single locus that encodes Endog (Fig. 1k) . These data identify Endog as the candidate gene at the QTL and infer Endog loss-of-function as the mechanism for increased cardiac mass and impaired heart function. We performed immunoblotting across rat and mouse tissues and determined that Endog was most highly expressed in the heart, localised to cardiomyocytes (Fig. 2) and co-localised with mitochondria (Supplementary Fig. 3). Using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown of Endog (shEndog)[19] we tested the effect of Endog loss-of-function in cardiomyocytes and observed an increase in hypertrophic biomarkers and cell size in the absence of pro-hypertrophic stimulation (Fig. 2). Conventional BP-dependent hypertrophic signalling pathways[12] were not activated in shEndog treated cells but we established activation of AMPK (Supplementary Fig. 4), which can induce cardiac hypertrophy[20]. We also observed increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), an additional pro-hypertrophic stimulus[21] that acts through multiple downstream effectors (Supplementary Fig. 4). These data show that Endog loss-of-function directly induces cardiac myocyte hypertrophy in vitro that is associated with the activation of two pro-hypertrophic pathways both of which have previously been linked with mitochondrial dysfunction[20,21,22].
Figure 2

Endog regulates cardiac hypertrophy

a, Immunoblot of Endog expression in mouse and rat tissues (Endog: ~30 kDa). b, Immunoblot of Endog expression in myocyte and non-myocyte populations isolated from neonatal rat heart. c, Cardiomyocyte size (n≥100 cells, n=3 independent experiments) treated with shRNA against Endog (shEndog) or control shRNA (shControl) in the presence or absence of the hypertrophic stimulant phenylephrine (PE, 100μM, 24 h). d, Expression of the hypertrophic biomarker Anf in shEndog and shControl treated cells. e, Cardiomyocyte size (Supplementary Fig. 5) in Endog-/- and wildtype (WT) mice at baseline and following angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy. f, LVM/tibial length in Endog-/- and WT mice at baseline and following AngII stimulation. Data are represented as mean+s.e.m. *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001.

We then examined the effects of Endog loss-of-function in vivo in the Endog deleted mouse (Endog-/-)[17] that exhibits no detectable variation in apoptotic phenotypes, an observation that was confirmed in an independent Endog deleted strain[16]. As compared to controls, Endog-/- mice had larger cardiomyocytes at baseline (Fig. 2) in the absence of stimulation, in keeping with our observations in the SHR.BN-(3L) rat (Fig. 1) and in vitro (Fig. 2). Following angiotensin II stimulation of hypertrophy, which is largely ROS-dependent[21], we observed an increase in cardiomyocyte size, hypertrophic biomarkers and LVM in Endog-/- mice (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig 5). Endog-/- mice had BPs equivalent to control mice at baseline (P=0.49) and following angiotensin II stimulation (P=0.51). Our combined in vitro and in vivo data confirm a role for Endog in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and identify ROS as a conserved pro-hypertrophic stimulus in both systems. Endog was proposed[8] but subsequently disputed[16,17] as important for apoptotic cell death and it was unclear how Endog loss-of-function was associated with cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. To infer ENDOG function in the human heart, we carried out genome-wide coexpression network analysis[23] in a large human cardiac expression dataset (n=210) (Supplementary Methods). ENDOG was identified in a network that was highly enriched for mitochondrial genes (P=1.8×10−58) and oxidative metabolism processes (P=4.7×10−38) (Fig. 3) (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Taken together, the high levels of Endog expression in metabolically active organs (Fig. 2) and in brown fat (Supplementary Fig. 6), the unique co-expression of ENDOG with oxidative metabolism genes and the link with AMPK signalling and ROS production pointed to an unappreciated effect of Endog in physiological mitochondrial processes.
Figure 3

ENDOG is co-expressed with a mitochondrial-specific gene network and regulated by Pgc1α and ERRα

a, Genes (8,490 from 210 datasets) are clustered and plotted based on the dissimilarity metric between their expression profiles (Supplementary Methods). From top to bottom: low-hanging branches in the dendrogram represent groups of genes (modules) that have a high similarity metric. Modules are shown beneath the dendrogram and are colour coded. The arrow indicates the module (also boxed) containing ENDOG. In the heat-map of the correlations between expression profiles, high and low similarities are coloured yellow and red, respectively. b, Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA[23]) for the module containing ENDOG, providing functional annotation by cellular localization by Gene Ontology classification (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Nodes represent genes and edges represent significant co-expression between genes. The node size is proportional to the relative degree of interconnectivity of each gene within the module. c, QPCR analysis of Endog expression in cultured cardiomyocytes following infection with adenovirus (ad) expressing GFP (ad.GFP) or Pgc1α (ad.Pgc1α). d, Immunoblot of Endog expression in ad.Pgc1α-infected cardiomyocytes (top panel), skeletal muscle of wild-type (WT) mice and transgenic mice expressing Pgc1α under the control of muscle creatine kinase (MCK-Pgc1α) (middle panel), and in hearts of WT and cardiac-specific Pgc1α deleted mice (Pgc1α) (bottom panel). e, Endog promoter activity in HEK293 cells infected with ad.Pgc1α and and/or ad.Errα. f, ERRα chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and PCR of two regions of the ENDOG promoter. Red arrows denote primers and ERRE specifies the location of a consensus ERR response element (1304 bases upstream). The experiment was repeated three times with similar results and PCR products quantified by QPCR.

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha (Pgc1α) is widely recognised as a master regulator of mitochondrial function[24], and activates many target genes component of the ENDOG-associated network (Fig. 3) through interaction with estrogen-related receptor alpha (Errα)[9]. Therefore, we tested whether Pgc1α also regulated Endog and observed robust Pgc1α-induced Endog transcript and Endog protein expression in cardiomyocytes in vitro (Fig. 3). We confirmed the effects of Pgc1α variation on Endog protein expression in vivo using mice over-expressing Pgc1α under the control of muscle creatine kinase (MCK-Pgc1α) and in cardiac-specific Pgc1α deleted mice (Pgc1α) (Fig. 3, Supplementary Methods). Luciferase studies revealed strong activation of the Endog promoter by Pgc1α and Errα together (Fig. 3e) and we confirmed direct binding of ESRRα to the ENDOG promoter by chromatin immuno-precipitation and PCR (ChIP-PCR) in a region containing an ERRα response element (P<0.001) (Fig. 3f). These data show that Endog is a direct target of ESRRα and Pgc1α, master regulators of mitochondrial and heart function, further inferring a role for Endog in mitochondrial and cardiac biology. It was apparent that the effects of Endog loss-of-function on cardiac hypertrophy might be mediated through perturbation of mitochondrial physiology, which we examined. Electron microscopy revealed no gross morphological changes of mitochondria but we observed lipid-like droplets associated with mitochondria from Endog-/- mice that were more numerous and larger than those seen in control mice. Molecular studies revealed marked elevation of triglyceride levels in the Endog-/- mouse heart that was manifest as cardiomyocyte steatosis (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 7) but not associated with variation in expression levels of fatty acid metabolism or mitochondrial biogenesis genes (Supplementary Fig. 8 and 9). As compared to wildtype littermates, Endog-/- mice had impaired mitochondrial respiration and increased ROS production (Fig. 4).
Figure 4

Endog regulates mitochondrial function and cardiac lipid metabolism

a, Transmission electron micrographs and oil red O stained micrographs (high resolution, Supplementary Fig. 7) of left ventricular sections from WT and Endog-/- mice. b, Quantification of the number of mitochondrial-associated droplets in WT and Endog-/- mice. c, Quantification of cardiac triglyceride (TAG), phospholipid and cholesterol content in WT and Endog-/- mice (n=5). d, Ratio of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to genomic DNA (gDNA) in hearts of WT and Endog-/- mice. e, Quantification of mitochondrial protein content in WT and Endog-/- mice (n=5). f, State 3 and state 4 oxygen consumption in the presence of complex I or complex II substrates in isolated cardiac mitochondria from WT (n=6) and Endog-/- (n=5) mice. g, Relative fluorescence-based measurement of ROS production by mitochondria isolated from WT (n=6) and Endog-/- (n=5) mice. h-k, Representative flow cytometry analysis of mitochondrial mass in HEK293 and H9C2 cells over-expressing ENDOG or Endog, respectively (n=4). h, Stable expression of ENDOG in HEK293 cells (HEK293-ENDOG). i, Flow cytometry analysis of HEK293 and HEK293-ENDOG cells stained with mitotracker. j, Adenovirus (ad)-mediated expression of GFP and Endog in myocytes and flow cytometry analysis of ad.Endog infected cells (Q2) and uninfected control cells (Q1). k, Number of events plotted against mitochondrial mass in ad.Endog infected (Q2) and control (Q1) H9C2 cells. l, QPCR of mtDNA-protein complexes following ChIP of mitochondrial chromatin using anti-ENDOG antibody or IgG. All data are represented as mean+s.e.m. *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001.

To assess for mitochondrial depletion we examined mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)/genomic DNA and mitochondrial protein/tissue weight ratios, which were both diminished in the Endog-/- mouse heart (Fig. 4) in the absence of mtDNA structural variation (Supplementary Fig. 10). This was an intriguing finding given the previously proposed roles for Endog in mtDNA synthesis, processing of poly-cistronic mtRNA and mitochondrial biogenesis[25,26] that were subsequently discarded based primarily on experiments in Endog deleted mice[16,17]. We re-examined a role of ENDOG in mitochondrial biogenesis and demonstrated an increase in mitochondrial mass with chronic ENDOG expression in HEK cells (P<0.01)and acute Endog over-expression in a cardiomyocyte-derived cell line (P<0.001) (Fig. 4k-k in the absence of an effect on apoptotic or necrotic cell death (Supplementary Fig. 11). A role for ENDOG in mtDNA biology[25,26] was supported further by ChIP-PCR experiments that showed direct binding of ENDOG throughout the mtDNA molecule (Fig. 4n) as previously demonstrated for mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM)[27], which is a critical determinant of mtDNA synthesis and repair that when deleted causes eccentric cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure[28]. Mitochondria are essential for oxidative metabolism and mitochondrial dysfunction/depletion in the heart causes maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac dysfunction associated with increased ROS and lipotoxicity[4,5,28,29]. Here we identified Endog loss-of-function as a primary determinant of maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy that was associated with mitochondrial dysfunction/depletion and marked cardiomyocyte steatosis. Although the mechanism underlying cardiac hypertrophy due to impaired mitochondrial function is not limited to a single pathway we demonstrated a conserved increase in ROS, an established hypertrophic stimulus[21,22], in Endog loss-of-function models. Our studies resolve some of the uncertainty as to the non-apoptotic function of Endog[15,16,17] and reveal it’s importance in mitochondrial biology, which has intriguing parallels with the dual roles of apoptosis-inducing-factor[30]. We propose that ENDOG, which we show binds to mtDNA, modulates mtDNA synthesis, maintenance and/or transcription, in keeping with previous hypotheses[25,26]. Therapeutic targeting the Pgc1α/Errα axis has been proposed to improve mitochondrial function in cardiac failure[11] and our studies suggest that regulation of Endog is an important component of this process. We conclude that Endog is a novel determinant of maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy with previously unappreciated mitochondrial functions.

Methods Summary

Linkage mapping was carried out using microsatellite genotypes in the BNxSHR F2 population. Ex vivo heart weight analysis was performed in the congenic strains, which were characterised using in vivo BP telemetry. Comparative haplotype analysis was performed using SNP data (Rat Genome Database; http://rgd.mcw.edu/) for all strains used in the QTL mapping studies. Microarray-based expression analysis was conducted as previously described[6,7]. Cell size and hypertrophy biomarker expression were measured in cardiomyocytes following lentivirus-mediated Endog knockdown. Heart weight, hypertrophic biomarker expression and cardiomyocyte cell size were measured in Endog-/- mice at baseline and following angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy. Triglyceride abundance, mitochondrial mass and respiratory activity were measured in Endog-/- mice as described in the Supplementary material. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)[23] was applied to the largest publicly available human heart transcriptome dataset. Regulation of Endog by Pgc1α was investigated in Ad.Pgc1α-infected neonatal cardiomyocytes, MCK-Pgc1 skeletal muscle and Pgc1 α heart samples. ERRα association with the ENDOG promoter and ENDOG-mtDNA interaction were determined using ChIP. Histological analysis and electron microscopy of Endog-/- hearts was carried out to study mitochondrial structure and abundance as well as lipid deposition. MtDNA and gDNA copy number were assessed by QPCR. Mitochondrial abundance was studied in cells by flow cytometry. Full methods are provided in Supplementary Methods.
  30 in total

1.  Constitutively active AMP kinase mutations cause glycogen storage disease mimicking hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Michael Arad; D Woodrow Benson; Antonio R Perez-Atayde; William J McKenna; Elizabeth A Sparks; Ronald J Kanter; Kate McGarry; J G Seidman; Christine E Seidman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Switch from caspase-dependent to caspase-independent death during heart development: essential role of endonuclease G in ischemia-induced DNA processing of differentiated cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Núria Bahi; Jisheng Zhang; Marta Llovera; Manel Ballester; Joan X Comella; Daniel Sanchis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Mitochondrial oxidative stress mediates angiotensin II-induced cardiac hypertrophy and Galphaq overexpression-induced heart failure.

Authors:  Dao-Fu Dai; Simon C Johnson; Jason J Villarin; Michael T Chin; Madeline Nieves-Cintrón; Tony Chen; David J Marcinek; Gerald W Dorn; Y James Kang; Tomas A Prolla; Luis F Santana; Peter S Rabinovitch
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  AIF deficiency compromises oxidative phosphorylation.

Authors:  Nicola Vahsen; Céline Candé; Jean-Jacques Brière; Paule Bénit; Nicholas Joza; Nathanael Larochette; Pier Giorgio Mastroberardino; Marie O Pequignot; Noelia Casares; Vladimir Lazar; Olivier Feraud; Najet Debili; Silke Wissing; Silvia Engelhardt; Frank Madeo; Mauro Piacentini; Josef M Penninger; Hermann Schägger; Pierre Rustin; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Mechanisms controlling mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration through the thermogenic coactivator PGC-1.

Authors:  Z Wu; P Puigserver; U Andersson; C Zhang; G Adelmant; V Mootha; A Troy; S Cinti; B Lowell; R C Scarpulla; B M Spiegelman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-07-09       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  EndoG is dispensable in embryogenesis and apoptosis.

Authors:  K K David; M Sasaki; S-W Yu; T M Dawson; V L Dawson
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 15.828

7.  Primers for mitochondrial DNA replication generated by endonuclease G.

Authors:  J Côté; A Ruiz-Carrillo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Transcriptional control of mitochondrial energy metabolism through the PGC1 coactivators.

Authors:  Bruce M Spiegelman
Journal:  Novartis Found Symp       Date:  2007

9.  Genetic variants associated with cardiac structure and function: a meta-analysis and replication of genome-wide association data.

Authors:  Ramachandran S Vasan; Nicole L Glazer; Janine F Felix; Wolfgang Lieb; Philipp S Wild; Stephan B Felix; Norbert Watzinger; Martin G Larson; Nicholas L Smith; Abbas Dehghan; Anika Grosshennig; Arne Schillert; Alexander Teumer; Reinhold Schmidt; Sekar Kathiresan; Thomas Lumley; Yurii S Aulchenko; Inke R König; Tanja Zeller; Georg Homuth; Maksim Struchalin; Jayashri Aragam; Joshua C Bis; Fernando Rivadeneira; Jeanette Erdmann; Renate B Schnabel; Marcus Dörr; Robert Zweiker; Lars Lind; Richard J Rodeheffer; Karin Halina Greiser; Daniel Levy; Talin Haritunians; Jaap W Deckers; Jan Stritzke; Karl J Lackner; Uwe Völker; Erik Ingelsson; Iftikhar Kullo; Johannes Haerting; Christopher J O'Donnell; Susan R Heckbert; Bruno H Stricker; Andreas Ziegler; Thorsten Reffelmann; Margaret M Redfield; Karl Werdan; Gary F Mitchell; Kenneth Rice; Donna K Arnett; Albert Hofman; John S Gottdiener; Andre G Uitterlinden; Thomas Meitinger; Maria Blettner; Nele Friedrich; Thomas J Wang; Bruce M Psaty; Cornelia M van Duijn; H-Erich Wichmann; Thomas F Munzel; Heyo K Kroemer; Emelia J Benjamin; Jerome I Rotter; Jacqueline C Witteman; Heribert Schunkert; Helena Schmidt; Henry Völzke; Stefan Blankenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Chromosomal localization of mitochondrial transcription factor A (TCF6), single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSBP), and endonuclease G (ENDOG), three human housekeeping genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis.

Authors:  V Tiranti; E Rossi; A Ruiz-Carrillo; G Rossi; M Rocchi; S DiDonato; O Zuffardi; M Zeviani
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-01-20       Impact factor: 5.736

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic stress in the myocardium: adaptations of gene expression.

Authors:  Peter A Crawford; Jean E Schaffer
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.000

2.  Translational Regulation of the Mitochondrial Genome Following Redistribution of Mitochondrial MicroRNA in the Diabetic Heart.

Authors:  Rajaganapathi Jagannathan; Dharendra Thapa; Cody E Nichols; Danielle L Shepherd; Janelle C Stricker; Tara L Croston; Walter A Baseler; Sara E Lewis; Ivan Martinez; John M Hollander
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2015-09-16

3.  Perm1 enhances mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative capacity, and fatigue resistance in adult skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Yoshitake Cho; Bethany C Hazen; Paulo G Gandra; Samuel R Ward; Simon Schenk; Aaron P Russell; Anastasia Kralli
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  The Role of Estrogen and Estrogen Receptors on Cardiomyocytes: An Overview.

Authors:  Tao Luo; Jin Kyung Kim
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.223

5.  Endonuclease-G and the pathways to dopaminergic neurodegeneration: a question of location?

Authors:  Marion C Hogg; Jochen H M Prehn
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Barriers to male transmission of mitochondrial DNA in sperm development.

Authors:  Steven Z DeLuca; Patrick H O'Farrell
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  VDAC oligomers form mitochondrial pores to release mtDNA fragments and promote lupus-like disease.

Authors:  Jeonghan Kim; Rajeev Gupta; Luz P Blanco; Shutong Yang; Anna Shteinfer-Kuzmine; Kening Wang; Jun Zhu; Hee Eun Yoon; Xinghao Wang; Martijn Kerkhofs; Hyeog Kang; Alexandra L Brown; Sung-Jun Park; Xihui Xu; Eddy Zandee van Rilland; Myung K Kim; Jeffrey I Cohen; Mariana J Kaplan; Varda Shoshan-Barmatz; Jay H Chung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Genetics of common forms of heart failure: challenges and potential solutions.

Authors:  Christoph D Rau; Aldons J Lusis; Yibin Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Mapping genetic contributions to cardiac pathology induced by Beta-adrenergic stimulation in mice.

Authors:  Christoph D Rau; Jessica Wang; Rozeta Avetisyan; Milagros C Romay; Lisa Martin; Shuxun Ren; Yibin Wang; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2014-12-05

Review 10.  Systems genetics approaches to understand complex traits.

Authors:  Mete Civelek; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.