Literature DB >> 21974939

To determine the level of satisfaction among medical students of a public sector medical university regarding their academic activities.

Bushra Manzar1, Nabeel Manzar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An ongoing evaluation system is essential to determine if the academic system in place has worked to produce a better product, hence the objective of our study was to evaluate the satisfaction level among medical students regarding their academic teaching and assessment method and what measures will they suggest for the future to rectify the current situation.This questionnaire based cross sectional study was conducted in a public sector medical university from February to July 2010. A well structured questionnaire was administered to a random sample of 375 final year medical students. However 292 of the students provided informed consent and filled in the questionnaire which included their demographic profile as well as questions in line with the study objective. Data was entered in a Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version.16) and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
FINDINGS: The male to female ratio in our study was 1:2. Most of the students (57.2%) were dissatisfied with the quality of teaching in the university. Fifty-seven percent of the participants believed that the current standard of their institute were not at par with those of international medical universities. BCQ's were the mode of examination questions preferred by the majority of the students. Most of the students (66.1%) wanted the university to conduct career planning seminars to help them plan their career.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the students of public sector medical universities are unsatisfied from current academic facilities and teaching activities. Students recommend increased emphasis on better lectures and practical training as well as a need to incorporate career planning sessions for the students to help plan them their future career paths.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21974939      PMCID: PMC3203073          DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


  21 in total

1.  Students add value to learning organizations: the Medical University of South Carolina experience.

Authors:  A W Chessman; J P Bellack; M R Lahoz; A W White; B Kennedy; S C Slaughter; G D Cleghorn
Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.926

2.  Small-group discussion versus lecture format for third-year students in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  Richard L Fischer; Samuel L Jacobs; William N P Herbert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Student perspectives of assessment by TEMM model in physiology.

Authors:  Reem Rachel Abraham; Subramanya Upadhya; Sharmila Torke; K Ramnarayan
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Opinion of medical students regarding problem based learning.

Authors:  Farida Habib; Lubna Baig; Farah Asad Mansuri
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.781

5.  A survey of medical students' perceptions of the quality of their medical education upon graduation.

Authors:  Mohammad Jalili; Azim Mirzazadeh; Apameh Azarpira
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 6.  Medical education and medical educators in South Asia--a set of challenges.

Authors:  P Ravi Shankar; Rano Mal Piryani
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.711

7.  Irish students and medical education.

Authors:  S Rooney; R Cullivan; G Kelly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Changing medical education.

Authors:  J Grant; R Gale
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching.

Authors:  Matthew L Costa; Lee van Rensburg; Neil Rushton
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Marcel F D'Eon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.