Literature DB >> 17269956

Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching.

Matthew L Costa1, Lee van Rensburg, Neil Rushton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Educational theory suggests that lectures may not be the best way to impart knowledge to students. The aim of this study was to compare the use of didactic lectures with that of interactive discussion sessions in undergraduate teaching of orthopaedics and trauma.
METHODS: A total of 77 medical students were assessed in 3 consecutive cohorts. The students were randomised into 2 groups. The first group received a series of 12 formal lectures. The second group covered the same topics in 12 group-discussion sessions with self-directed learning.
RESULTS: The students in the interactive discussion group rated the presentation of their teaching more highly than those in the lecture group (P = 0.003). However, there was no difference in their rating of the content of the sessions. The students in the discussion group also performed better on their end-of-placement written test (P = 0.025).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that interactive teaching styles are more popular than didactic lectures in undergraduate orthopaedic and trauma teaching. We also found some evidence that knowledge retention is better following an interactive teaching style.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17269956     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02677.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  24 in total

1.  Investigating the relationship between pharmacy students' achievement goal orientations and preferred teacher qualities.

Authors:  Saleh Alrakaf; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  To determine the level of satisfaction among medical students of a public sector medical university regarding their academic activities.

Authors:  Bushra Manzar; Nabeel Manzar
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-10-05

3.  A comparison of Web-based and small-group palliative and end-of-life care curricula: a quasi-randomized controlled study at one institution.

Authors:  Frank C Day; Malathi Srinivasan; Claudia Der-Martirosian; Erin Griffin; Jerome R Hoffman; Michael S Wilkes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zuzana de Jong; Jessica Ab van Nies; Sonja Wm Peters; Sylvia Vink; Friedo W Dekker; Albert Scherpbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Comparison of two teaching methods for stopping the bleed: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shuangyi Chen; Jinfei Li; Michael A DiNenna; Chen Gao; Shijie Chen; Song Wu; Xiaohong Tang; Jinshen He
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Influence of assigned reading on senior medical student clinical performance.

Authors:  Lance Hoffman; Kristine Bott; Susan Puumala; Valerie Shostrom
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-02

7.  Comparing dental students' perceptions of their educational environment in Northwestern Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ahmad; Ahmed Bhayat; Hani T Fadel; Mohammad S Mahrous
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Orthopaedic education: a COVID-driven evolution.

Authors:  Alex Trompeter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-07

9.  A health care system in transformation: making the case for chiropractic.

Authors:  Richard Brown
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-12-06

10.  Sustained change in didactic skills--does teacher training last?

Authors:  Olaf Kuhnigk; Julia Schreiner; Sigrid Harendza
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2013-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.