Literature DB >> 21973055

Accelerating the domestication of trees using genomic selection: accuracy of prediction models across ages and environments.

M F R Resende1, P Muñoz, J J Acosta, G F Peter, J M Davis, D Grattapaglia, M D V Resende, M Kirst.   

Abstract

• Genomic selection is increasingly considered vital to accelerate genetic improvement. However, it is unknown how accurate genomic selection prediction models remain when used across environments and ages. This knowledge is critical for breeders to apply this strategy in genetic improvement. • Here, we evaluated the utility of genomic selection in a Pinus taeda population of c. 800 individuals clonally replicated and grown on four sites, and genotyped for 4825 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Prediction models were estimated for diameter and height at multiple ages using genomic random regression best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP). • Accuracies of prediction models ranged from 0.65 to 0.75 for diameter, and 0.63 to 0.74 for height. The selection efficiency per unit time was estimated as 53-112% higher using genomic selection compared with phenotypic selection, assuming a reduction of 50% in the breeding cycle. Accuracies remained high across environments as long as they were used within the same breeding zone. However, models generated at early ages did not perform well to predict phenotypes at age 6 yr. • These results demonstrate the feasibility and remarkable gain that can be achieved by incorporating genomic selection in breeding programs, as long as models are used at the relevant selection age and within the breeding zone in which they were estimated.
© 2011 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2011 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21973055     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03895.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  75 in total

1.  A proposal to use gamete cycling in vitro to improve crops and livestock.

Authors:  Seth C Murray; Philip Eckhoff; Lowell Wood; Andrew H Paterson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  A comparison of genomic selection models across time in interior spruce (Picea engelmannii × glauca) using unordered SNP imputation methods.

Authors:  B Ratcliffe; O G El-Dien; J Klápště; I Porth; C Chen; B Jaquish; Y A El-Kassaby
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Patricio R Muñoz; Marcio F R Resende; Salvador A Gezan; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos; Matias Kirst; Dudley Huber; Gary F Peter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Accurate genomic prediction of Coffea canephora in multiple environments using whole-genome statistical models.

Authors:  Luís Felipe Ventorim Ferrão; Romário Gava Ferrão; Maria Amélia Gava Ferrão; Aymbiré Fonseca; Peter Carbonetto; Matthew Stephens; Antonio Augusto Franco Garcia
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Genomic selection and genetic gain for nut yield in an Australian macadamia breeding population.

Authors:  Katie M O'Connor; Ben J Hayes; Craig M Hardner; Mobashwer Alam; Robert J Henry; Bruce L Topp
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Sustainable bioenergy for climate mitigation: developing drought-tolerant trees and grasses.

Authors:  G Taylor; I S Donnison; D Murphy-Bokern; M Morgante; M-B Bogeat-Triboulot; R Bhalerao; M Hertzberg; A Polle; A Harfouche; F Alasia; V Petoussi; D Trebbi; K Schwarz; J J B Keurentjes; M Centritto; B Genty; J Flexas; E Grill; S Salvi; W J Davies
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Accuracy of genomic selection models in a large population of open-pollinated families in white spruce.

Authors:  J Beaulieu; T Doerksen; S Clément; J MacKay; J Bousquet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Assessing the expected response to genomic selection of individuals and families in Eucalyptus breeding with an additive-dominant model.

Authors:  R T Resende; M D V Resende; F F Silva; C F Azevedo; E K Takahashi; O B Silva-Junior; D Grattapaglia
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Breeding Value of Primary Synthetic Wheat Genotypes for Grain Yield.

Authors:  Jafar Jafarzadeh; David Bonnett; Jean-Luc Jannink; Deniz Akdemir; Susanne Dreisigacker; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates.

Authors:  Akio Onogi; Maya Watanabe; Toshihiro Mochizuki; Takeshi Hayashi; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Toshihiro Hasegawa; Hiroyoshi Iwata
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.