Literature DB >> 26791836

Toward integration of genomic selection with crop modelling: the development of an integrated approach to predicting rice heading dates.

Akio Onogi1, Maya Watanabe1, Toshihiro Mochizuki2, Takeshi Hayashi3, Hiroshi Nakagawa3, Toshihiro Hasegawa4, Hiroyoshi Iwata5.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: It is suggested that accuracy in predicting plant phenotypes can be improved by integrating genomic prediction with crop modelling in a single hierarchical model. Accurate prediction of phenotypes is important for plant breeding and management. Although genomic prediction/selection aims to predict phenotypes on the basis of whole-genome marker information, it is often difficult to predict phenotypes of complex traits in diverse environments, because plant phenotypes are often influenced by genotype-environment interaction. A possible remedy is to integrate genomic prediction with crop/ecophysiological modelling, which enables us to predict plant phenotypes using environmental and management information. To this end, in the present study, we developed a novel method for integrating genomic prediction with phenological modelling of Asian rice (Oryza sativa, L.), allowing the heading date of untested genotypes in untested environments to be predicted. The method simultaneously infers the phenological model parameters and whole-genome marker effects on the parameters in a Bayesian framework. By cultivating backcross inbred lines of Koshihikari × Kasalath in nine environments, we evaluated the potential of the proposed method in comparison with conventional genomic prediction, phenological modelling, and two-step methods that applied genomic prediction to phenological model parameters inferred from Nelder-Mead or Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. In predicting heading dates of untested lines in untested environments, the proposed and two-step methods tended to provide more accurate predictions than the conventional genomic prediction methods, particularly in environments where phenotypes from environments similar to the target environment were unavailable for training genomic prediction. The proposed method showed greater accuracy in prediction than the two-step methods in all cross-validation schemes tested, suggesting the potential of the integrated approach in the prediction of phenotypes of plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791836     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-016-2667-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  28 in total

1.  Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS.

Authors:  M Yano; Y Katayose; M Ashikari; U Yamanouchi; L Monna; T Fuse; T Baba; K Yamamoto; Y Umehara; Y Nagamura; T Sasaki
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Genetic dissection of a genomic region for a quantitative trait locus, Hd3, into two loci, Hd3a and Hd3b, controlling heading date in rice.

Authors:  L. Monna; X. Lin; S. Kojima; T. Sasaki; M. Yano
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships.

Authors:  Xinyou Yin; Paul C Struik; Martin J Kropff
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 18.313

4.  Estimation of quantitative trait locus effects with epistasis by variational Bayes algorithms.

Authors:  Zitong Li; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  QTL methodology for response curves on the basis of non-linear mixed models, with an illustration to senescence in potato.

Authors:  M Malosetti; R G F Visser; C Celis-Gamboa; F A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  QTL analysis and QTL-based prediction of flowering phenology in recombinant inbred lines of barley.

Authors:  Xinyou Yin; Paul C Struik; Fred A van Eeuwijk; Piet Stam; Jianjun Tang
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers.

Authors:  José Crossa; Gustavo de Los Campos; Paulino Pérez; Daniel Gianola; Juan Burgueño; José Luis Araus; Dan Makumbi; Ravi P Singh; Susanne Dreisigacker; Jianbing Yan; Vivi Arief; Marianne Banziger; Hans-Joachim Braun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation.

Authors:  Frank Technow; Carlos D Messina; L Radu Totir; Mark Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Functional multi-locus QTL mapping of temporal trends in Scots pine wood traits.

Authors:  Zitong Li; Henrik R Hallingbäck; Sara Abrahamsson; Anders Fries; Bengt Andersson Gull; Mikko J Sillanpää; M Rosario García-Gil
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 10.  Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review.

Authors:  Philip K Thornton; Polly J Ericksen; Mario Herrero; Andrew J Challinor
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Advances in integrated genomic selection for rapid genetic gain in crop improvement: a review.

Authors:  C Anilkumar; N C Sunitha; Narayana Bhat Devate; S Ramesh
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.540

2.  Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction of white rust resistance in USDA GRIN spinach germplasm.

Authors:  Ainong Shi; Gehendra Bhattarai; Haizheng Xiong; Carlos A Avila; Chunda Feng; Bo Liu; Vijay Joshi; Larry Stein; Beiquan Mou; Lindsey J du Toit; James C Correll
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 7.291

Review 3.  Genomic Prediction: Progress and Perspectives for Rice Improvement.

Authors:  Jérôme Bartholomé; Parthiban Thathapalli Prakash; Joshua N Cobb
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  José Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Germano Costa-Neto; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Rodomiro Ortiz; Johannes W R Martini; Morten Lillemo; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquin; Flavio Breseghello; Jaime Cuevas; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Integration of Crop Growth Models and Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Akio Onogi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Bayesian optimization for genomic selection: a method for discovering the best genotype among a large number of candidates.

Authors:  Ryokei Tanaka; Hiroyoshi Iwata
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Genetic Nature of Elemental Contents in Wheat Grains and Its Genomic Prediction: Toward the Effective Use of Wheat Landraces from Afghanistan.

Authors:  Alagu Manickavelu; Tomohiro Hattori; Shuhei Yamaoka; Kazusa Yoshimura; Youichi Kondou; Akio Onogi; Minami Matsui; Hiroyoshi Iwata; Tomohiro Ban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Optimization of multi-environment trials for genomic selection based on crop models.

Authors:  R Rincent; E Kuhn; H Monod; F-X Oury; M Rousset; V Allard; J Le Gouis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Genome-Based Prediction of Time to Curd Induction in Cauliflower.

Authors:  Arne Rosen; Yaser Hasan; William Briggs; Ralf Uptmoor
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Trait variation and genetic diversity in a banana genomic selection training population.

Authors:  Moses Nyine; Brigitte Uwimana; Rony Swennen; Michael Batte; Allan Brown; Pavla Christelová; Eva Hřibová; Jim Lorenzen; Jaroslav Doležel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.