Literature DB >> 28900291

Assessing the expected response to genomic selection of individuals and families in Eucalyptus breeding with an additive-dominant model.

R T Resende1, M D V Resende2,3, F F Silva4, C F Azevedo2, E K Takahashi5, O B Silva-Junior6,7, D Grattapaglia6,7.   

Abstract

We report a genomic selection (GS) study of growth and wood quality traits in an outbred F2 hybrid Eucalyptus population (n=768) using high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping. Going beyond previous reports in forest trees, models were developed for different selection targets, namely, families, individuals within families and individuals across the entire population using a genomic model including dominance. To provide a more breeder-intelligible assessment of the performance of GS we calculated the expected response as the percentage gain over the population average expected genetic value (EGV) for different proportions of genomically selected individuals, using a rigorous cross-validation (CV) scheme that removed relatedness between training and validation sets. Predictive abilities (PAs) were 0.40-0.57 for individual selection and 0.56-0.75 for family selection. PAs under an additive+dominance model improved predictions by 5 to 14% for growth depending on the selection target, but no improvement was seen for wood traits. The good performance of GS with no relatedness in CV suggested that our average SNP density (~25 kb) captured some short-range linkage disequilibrium. Truncation GS successfully selected individuals with an average EGV significantly higher than the population average. Response to GS on a per year basis was ~100% more efficient than by phenotypic selection and more so with higher selection intensities. These results contribute further experimental data supporting the positive prospects of GS in forest trees. Because generation times are long, traits are complex and costs of DNA genotyping are plummeting, genomic prediction has good perspectives of adoption in tree breeding practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900291      PMCID: PMC5597783          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2017.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  33 in total

1.  Age-age and trait-trait correlations for Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden and their implications for optimal selection age and design of clonal trials.

Authors:  L F Osorio; T L White; D A Huber
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2002-10-19       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genomic selection for growth and wood quality in Eucalyptus: capturing the missing heritability and accelerating breeding for complex traits in forest trees.

Authors:  Marcos D V Resende; Márcio F R Resende; Carolina P Sansaloni; Cesar D Petroli; Alexandre A Missiaggia; Aurelio M Aguiar; Jupiter M Abad; Elizabete K Takahashi; Antonio M Rosado; Danielle A Faria; Georgios J Pappas; Andrzej Kilian; Dario Grattapaglia
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  Breeding schemes for the implementation of genomic selection in wheat (Triticum spp.).

Authors:  Filippo M Bassi; Alison R Bentley; Gilles Charmet; Rodomiro Ortiz; Jose Crossa
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 4.729

4.  Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: prediction accuracy implications.

Authors:  J-M Bouvet; G Makouanzi; D Cros; Ph Vigneron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Does genomic selection have a future in plant breeding?

Authors:  Elisabeth Jonas; Dirk-Jan de Koning
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Unraveling additive from nonadditive effects using genomic relationship matrices.

Authors:  Patricio R Muñoz; Marcio F R Resende; Salvador A Gezan; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende; Gustavo de Los Campos; Matias Kirst; Dudley Huber; Gary F Peter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Correspondence between performance of Eucalyptus spp trees selected from family and clonal tests.

Authors:  C A F Reis; F M A Gonçalves; L N Rosse; R R G F Costa; M A P Ramalho
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2011-06-21

8.  Genomic selection in maritime pine.

Authors:  Fikret Isik; Jérôme Bartholomé; Alfredo Farjat; Emilie Chancerel; Annie Raffin; Leopoldo Sanchez; Christophe Plomion; Laurent Bouffier
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.729

9.  Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.).

Authors:  M F R Resende; P Muñoz; M D V Resende; D J Garrick; R L Fernando; J M Davis; E J Jokela; T A Martin; G F Peter; M Kirst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genomic estimated breeding values using genomic relationship matrices in a cloned population of loblolly pine.

Authors:  Jaime Zapata-Valenzuela; Ross W Whetten; David Neale; Steve McKeand; Fikret Isik
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  15 in total

1.  A new genomic prediction method with additive-dominance effects in the least-squares framework.

Authors:  Hailan Liu; Guo-Bo Chen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genomic prediction applied to multiple traits and environments in second season maize hybrids.

Authors:  Amanda Avelar de Oliveira; Marcio F R Resende; Luís Felipe Ventorim Ferrão; Rodrigo Rampazo Amadeu; Lauro José Moreira Guimarães; Claudia Teixeira Guimarães; Maria Marta Pastina; Gabriel Rodrigues Alves Margarido
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Single-step genomic prediction of Eucalyptus dunnii using different identity-by-descent and identity-by-state relationship matrices.

Authors:  Esteban J Jurcic; Pamela V Villalba; Pablo S Pathauer; Dino A Palazzini; Gustavo P J Oberschelp; Leonel Harrand; Martín N Garcia; Natalia C Aguirre; Cintia V Acuña; María C Martínez; Juan G Rivas; Esteban F Cisneros; Juan A López; Susana N Marcucci Poltri; Sebastián Munilla; Eduardo P Cappa
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.832

Review 4.  Quantitative Genetics and Genomics Converge to Accelerate Forest Tree Breeding.

Authors:  Dario Grattapaglia; Orzenil B Silva-Junior; Rafael T Resende; Eduardo P Cappa; Bárbara S F Müller; Biyue Tan; Fikret Isik; Blaise Ratcliffe; Yousry A El-Kassaby
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees.

Authors:  Janeo Eustáquio de Almeida Filho; João Filipi Rodrigues Guimarães; Fabyano Fonsceca E Silva; Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende; Patricio Muñoz; Matias Kirst; Marcio Fernando Ribeiro de Resende Júnior
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Genomic Selection with Allele Dosage in Panicum maximum Jacq.

Authors:  Letícia A de C Lara; Mateus F Santos; Liana Jank; Lucimara Chiari; Mariane de M Vilela; Rodrigo R Amadeu; Jhonathan P R Dos Santos; Guilherme da S Pereira; Zhao-Bang Zeng; Antonio Augusto F Garcia
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Genomic Predictions With Nonadditive Effects Improved Estimates of Additive Effects and Predictions of Total Genetic Values in Pinus sylvestris.

Authors:  Ainhoa Calleja-Rodriguez; ZhiQiang Chen; Mari Suontama; Jin Pan; Harry X Wu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Genomic prediction accuracies in space and time for height and wood density of Douglas-fir using exome capture as the genotyping platform.

Authors:  Frances R Thistlethwaite; Blaise Ratcliffe; Jaroslav Klápště; Ilga Porth; Charles Chen; Michael U Stoehr; Yousry A El-Kassaby
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits.

Authors:  Julia Piaskowski; Craig Hardner; Lichun Cai; Yunyang Zhao; Amy Iezzoni; Cameron Peace
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  SNP and Haplotype-Based Genomic Selection of Quantitative Traits in Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  Paulina Ballesta; Carlos Maldonado; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Freddy Mora
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.