Literature DB >> 21972022

Fragment screening and HIV therapeutics.

Joseph D Bauman1, Disha Patel, Eddy Arnold.   

Abstract

Fragment screening has proven to be a powerful alternative to traditional methods for drug discovery. Biophysical methods, such as X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and surface plasmon resonance, are used to screen a diverse library of small molecule compounds. Although compounds identified via this approach have relatively weak affinity, they provide a good platform for lead development and are highly efficient binders with respect to their size. Fragment screening has been utilized for a wide range of targets, including HIV-1 proteins. Here, we review the fragment screening studies targeting HIV-1 proteins using X-ray crystallography or surface plasmon resonance. These studies have successfully detected binding of novel fragments to either previously established or new sites on HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase. In addition, fragment screening against HIV-1 reverse transcriptase has been used as a tool to better understand the complex nature of ligand binding to a flexible target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21972022      PMCID: PMC3565459          DOI: 10.1007/128_2011_232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Curr Chem        ISSN: 0340-1022


  39 in total

Review 1.  NMR-based screening in drug discovery.

Authors:  P J Hajduk; R P Meadows; S W Fesik
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.318

2.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery?

Authors:  Miles Congreve; Robin Carr; Chris Murray; Harren Jhoti
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 3.  Structural biology in fragment-based drug design.

Authors:  Christopher W Murray; Tom L Blundell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 4.  SPR-based fragment screening: advantages and applications.

Authors:  T Neumann; H-D Junker; K Schmidt; R Sekul
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Fragment-based activity space: smaller is better.

Authors:  Thomas Hesterkamp; Mark Whittaker
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Adding calorimetric data to decision making in lead discovery: a hot tip.

Authors:  John E Ladbury; Gerhard Klebe; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  Fragment screening using X-ray crystallography.

Authors:  Thomas G Davies; Ian J Tickle
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2012

Review 8.  Combining biophysical screening and X-ray crystallography for fragment-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Michael Hennig; Armin Ruf; Walter Huber
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2012

9.  Deconstruction of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 for exploration of the optimization landscape of fragments.

Authors:  Peter Brandt; Matthis Geitmann; U Helena Danielson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Crystal structure of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase complexed with double-stranded DNA at 3.0 A resolution shows bent DNA.

Authors:  A Jacobo-Molina; J Ding; R G Nanni; A D Clark; X Lu; C Tantillo; R L Williams; G Kamer; A L Ferris; P Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  Crystallographic fragment-based drug discovery: use of a brominated fragment library targeting HIV protease.

Authors:  Theresa Tiefenbrunn; Stefano Forli; Meaghan Happer; Ana Gonzalez; Yingssu Tsai; Michael Soltis; John H Elder; Arthur J Olson; Charles D Stout
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.817

2.  Structures of endothiapepsin-fragment complexes from crystallographic fragment screening using a novel, diverse and affordable 96-compound fragment library.

Authors:  Franziska U Huschmann; Janina Linnik; Karine Sparta; Monika Ühlein; Xiaojie Wang; Alexander Metz; Johannes Schiebel; Andreas Heine; Gerhard Klebe; Manfred S Weiss; Uwe Mueller
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 1.056

3.  High-Throughput Screening (HTS) by NMR Guided Identification of Novel Agents Targeting the Protein Docking Domain of YopH.

Authors:  Angel Bottini; Bainan Wu; Elisa Barile; Surya K De; Marilisa Leone; Maurizio Pellecchia
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Detecting allosteric sites of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase by X-ray crystallographic fragment screening.

Authors:  Joseph D Bauman; Disha Patel; Chhaya Dharia; Marc W Fromer; Sameer Ahmed; Yulia Frenkel; R S K Vijayan; J Thomas Eck; William C Ho; Kalyan Das; Aaron J Shatkin; Eddy Arnold
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Avoiding Drug Resistance in HIV Reverse Transcriptase.

Authors:  Maria E Cilento; Karen A Kirby; Stefan G Sarafianos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Rapid experimental SAD phasing and hot-spot identification with halogenated fragments.

Authors:  Joseph D Bauman; Jerry Joe E K Harrison; Eddy Arnold
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.