Literature DB >> 18316043

Fragment-based activity space: smaller is better.

Thomas Hesterkamp1, Mark Whittaker.   

Abstract

Fragment-based drug discovery has the potential to supersede traditional high throughput screening based drug discovery for molecular targets amenable to structure determination. This is because the chemical diversity coverage is better accomplished by a fragment collection of reasonable size than by larger HTS collections. Furthermore, fragments have the potential to be efficient target binders with higher probability than more elaborated drug-like compounds. The selection of the fragment screening technique is driven by sensitivity and throughput considerations, and we advocate in the present article the use of high concentration bioassays in conjunction with NMR-based hit confirmation. Subsequent ligand X-ray structure determination of the fragment ligand in complex with the target protein by co-crystallisation or crystal soaking can focus on confirmed binders.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316043     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.822


  15 in total

1.  Design of compound libraries for fragment screening.

Authors:  Niklas Blomberg; David A Cosgrove; Peter W Kenny; Karin Kolmodin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The multiple roles of computational chemistry in fragment-based drug design.

Authors:  Richard Law; Oliver Barker; John J Barker; Thomas Hesterkamp; Robert Godemann; Ole Andersen; Tara Fryatt; Steve Courtney; Dave Hallett; Mark Whittaker
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  The rise of fragment-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Christopher W Murray; David C Rees
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 4.  Computational functional group mapping for drug discovery.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 5.  Advantages of crystallographic fragment screening: functional and mechanistic insights from a powerful platform for efficient drug discovery.

Authors:  Disha Patel; Joseph D Bauman; Eddy Arnold
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Differentiating analogous tRNA methyltransferases by fragments of the methyl donor.

Authors:  Georges Lahoud; Sakurako Goto-Ito; Ken-Ichi Yoshida; Takuhiro Ito; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Ya-Ming Hou
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 7.  Fragment screening and HIV therapeutics.

Authors:  Joseph D Bauman; Disha Patel; Eddy Arnold
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2012

8.  Detecting allosteric sites of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase by X-ray crystallographic fragment screening.

Authors:  Joseph D Bauman; Disha Patel; Chhaya Dharia; Marc W Fromer; Sameer Ahmed; Yulia Frenkel; R S K Vijayan; J Thomas Eck; William C Ho; Kalyan Das; Aaron J Shatkin; Eddy Arnold
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Fragment screening of cyclin G-associated kinase by weak affinity chromatography.

Authors:  Elinor Meiby; Stefan Knapp; Jonathan M Elkins; Sten Ohlson
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 10.  Identifying druggable disease-modifying gene products.

Authors:  Scott J Dixon; Brent R Stockwell
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.