Literature DB >> 21971973

Differences in susceptibility of five cladoceran species to two systemic insecticides, imidacloprid and fipronil.

Daisuke Hayasaka1, Tomoko Korenaga, Kazutaka Suzuki, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, Koichi Goka.   

Abstract

Differences in susceptibility of five cladocerans to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid and the phenyl-pyrazole fipronil, which have been dominantly used in rice fields of Japan in recent years, were examined based on short-term (48-h), semi-static acute immobilization exposure tests. Additionally, we compared the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) patterns of both insecticides between two sets of species: the five tested cladocerans and all other aquatic organisms tested so far, using data from the ECOTOX database of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The sensitivity of the test species to either imidacloprid or fipronil was consistent, spanning similar orders of magnitude (100 times). At the genus level, sensitivities to both insecticides were in the following descending order: Ceriodaphnia > Moina > Daphnia. A positive relationship was found between body lengths of each species and the acute toxicity (EC(50)) of the insecticides, in particular fipronil. Differences in SSD patterns of imidacloprid were found between the species groups compared, indicating that test cladocerans are much less susceptible than other aquatic species including amphibians, crustaceans, fish, insects, mollusks and worms. However, the SSD patterns for fipronil indicate no difference in sensitivity between cladocerans tested and other aquatic organisms despite the greater exposure, which overestimates the results, of our semi-static tests. From these results, Ceriodaphnia sp. should be considered as more sensitive bioindicators (instead of the standard Daphnia magna) for ecotoxicological assessments of aquatic ecosystems. In addition, we propose that ecotoxicity data associated with differences in susceptibility among species should be investigated whenever pesticides have different physicochemical properties and mode of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21971973     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-011-0802-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  23 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; J S Jaworska
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Influence of persistence period of an insecticide on recovery patterns of a zooplankton community in experimental ponds.

Authors:  T Hanazato; M Yasuno
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data.

Authors:  G C Hose; P J Van den Brink
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Differential sensitivity of a predacious cladoceran (Leptodora) and its prey (the cladoceran Bosmina) to the insecticide carbaryl: results of acute toxicity tests.

Authors:  M Sakamoto; K H Chang; T Hanazato
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Comparative acute toxicity of organic pollutants and reference values for crustaceans. I. Branchiopoda, Copepoda and Ostracoda.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Analyzing effects of pesticides on invertebrate communities in streams.

Authors:  Matthias Liess; Peter Carsten Von Der Ohe
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Sorption of fipronil and its metabolites on soils from South Australia.

Authors:  G G Ying; R S Kookana
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health B       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Impact of pesticide application on zooplankton communities with different densities of invertebrate predators: an experimental analysis using small-scale mesocosms.

Authors:  K H Chang; M Sakamoto; T Hanazato
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Sorption behaviour of acetochlor, atrazine, carbendazim, diazinon, imidacloprid and isoproturon on Hungarian agricultural soil.

Authors:  L Nemeth-Konda; Gy Füleky; Gy Morovjan; P Csokan
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  A comparison of the daphnids Ceriodaphnia dubia and Daphnia ambigua for their utilization in routine toxicity testing in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  S M Harmon; W L Specht; G T Chandler
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  12 in total

1.  Toxic potential of the emerging contaminant nicotine to the aquatic ecosystem.

Authors:  Ana Lourdes Oropesa; António Miguel Floro; Patrícia Palma
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Prediction and assessment of ecogenotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs in binary mixtures.

Authors:  Michael Kundi; Alfredo Parrella; Margherita Lavorgna; Emma Criscuolo; Chiara Russo; Marina Isidori
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Different acute toxicity of fipronil baits on invasive Linepithema humile supercolonies and some non-target ground arthropods.

Authors:  Daisuke Hayasaka; Naoki Kuwayama; Azuma Takeo; Takanobu Ishida; Hiroyuki Mano; Maki N Inoue; Takashi Nagai; Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Koichi Goka; Takuo Sawahata
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Short-term effects of pesticide fipronil on behavioral and physiological endpoints of Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Adam Bownik; Aleksandra Szabelak
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Macro-invertebrate decline in surface water polluted with imidacloprid.

Authors:  Tessa C Van Dijk; Marja A Van Staalduinen; Jeroen P Van der Sluijs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Systemic insecticides (neonicotinoids and fipronil): trends, uses, mode of action and metabolites.

Authors:  N Simon-Delso; V Amaral-Rogers; L P Belzunces; J M Bonmatin; M Chagnon; C Downs; L Furlan; D W Gibbons; C Giorio; V Girolami; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C H Krupke; M Liess; E Long; M McField; P Mineau; E A D Mitchell; C A Morrissey; D A Noome; L Pisa; J Settele; J D Stark; A Tapparo; H Van Dyck; J Van Praagh; J P Van der Sluijs; P R Whitehorn; M Wiemers
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Effects of clothianidin on aquatic communities: Evaluating the impacts of lethal and sublethal exposure to neonicotinoids.

Authors:  Jesse C Miles; Jessica Hua; Maria S Sepulveda; Christian H Krupke; Jason T Hoverman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Salinity and temperature increase impact groundwater crustaceans.

Authors:  Andrea Castaño-Sánchez; Grant C Hose; Ana Sofia P S Reboleira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Exposure to a nicotinoid pesticide reduces defensive behaviors in a non-target organism, the rusty crayfish Orconectes rusticus.

Authors:  Lauren Sohn; Renae J Brodie; Genevieve Couldwell; Eleanor Demmons; Joachim Sturve
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Fipronil application on rice paddy fields reduces densities of common skimmer and scarlet skimmer.

Authors:  Atsushi Kasai; Takehiko I Hayashi; Hitoshi Ohnishi; Kazutaka Suzuki; Daisuke Hayasaka; Koichi Goka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.