Literature DB >> 16111793

Comparative acute toxicity of organic pollutants and reference values for crustaceans. I. Branchiopoda, Copepoda and Ostracoda.

Francisco Sánchez-Bayo1.   

Abstract

The acute toxicity of 468 organic pollutants to planktonic crustaceans (Branchiopoda, Copepoda and Ostracoda) from pre-existing data was compared by means of statistical analysis and relative tolerance indices (Trel). A surrogate species commonly used in toxicity bioassays (Daphnia magna) showed toxicity levels--within one order of magnitude--similar to all other Cladocera species, at least for 82% of the chemicals studied. All neurotoxic insecticides except neonicotinoids, PCBs, organometallic compounds and PAHs are the most toxic substances to these organisms. Sensitivity levels among taxa were compared for individual chemicals as well as groups of chemicals with similar characteristics. Whilst there are marked differences in sensitivity among taxa and particular groups of chemicals, no consistent trends were found for freshwater and saltwater species in relation to the latter groups. No correlation between LC50 and size of these organisms was found other than by chance, making extrapolations based on allometric equations impossible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16111793     DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  16 in total

1.  Simplified models to analyse time- and dose-dependent responses of populations to toxicants.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Kouichi Goka
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  From simple toxicological models to prediction of toxic effects in time.

Authors:  Francisco Sánchez-Bayo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  A plea for the use of copepods in freshwater ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Devdutt Kulkarni; André Gergs; Udo Hommen; Hans Toni Ratte; Thomas G Preuss
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Use of the index of ideality of correlation to improve models of eco-toxicity.

Authors:  Alla P Toropova; Andrey A Toropov
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013.

Authors:  Thomas James Wood; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Individual and mixture acute toxicity of model pesticides chlordecone and pyriproxyfen in the estuarine copepod Eurytemora affinis.

Authors:  Elena Legrand; Céline Boulangé-Lecomte; Gwendal Restoux; Gauthier Trémolet; Aurélie Duflot; Joëlle Forget-Leray
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Differences in susceptibility of five cladoceran species to two systemic insecticides, imidacloprid and fipronil.

Authors:  Daisuke Hayasaka; Tomoko Korenaga; Kazutaka Suzuki; Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Koichi Goka
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Alkyl polyglucoside compound influences freshwater plankton community structure in floating field mesocosms.

Authors:  Steven F Riera; Risa A Cohen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Evaluating the toxic effects of three priority hazardous and noxious substances (HNS) to rotifer Brachionus plicatilis.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; Luqing Pan; Pengfei Lin; Jingjing Miao; Xiufen Wang; Yufei Lin; Jiangyue Wu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Interactions between zooplankton and crude oil: toxic effects and bioaccumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Rodrigo Almeda; Zoe Wambaugh; Zucheng Wang; Cammie Hyatt; Zhanfei Liu; Edward J Buskey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.