Literature DB >> 25980487

Different acute toxicity of fipronil baits on invasive Linepithema humile supercolonies and some non-target ground arthropods.

Daisuke Hayasaka1, Naoki Kuwayama, Azuma Takeo, Takanobu Ishida, Hiroyuki Mano, Maki N Inoue, Takashi Nagai, Francisco Sánchez-Bayo, Koichi Goka, Takuo Sawahata.   

Abstract

Fipronil is one of the most effective insecticides to control the invasive ant Linepithema humile, but its effectiveness has been assessed without considering the genetic differences among L. humile supercolonies. We hypothesized that the susceptibility of the ant to fipronil might differ among supercolonies. If so, dosage and concentration of fipronil may need to be adjusted for effective eradication of each supercolony. The relative sensitivities of four L. humile supercolonies established in Hyogo (Japan) to fipronil baits were examined based on their acute toxicity (48-h LC(50)). Toxicities of fipronil to seven ground arthropods, including four native ant species, one native isopoda, and two cockroaches were also determined and compared to that of L. humile supercolonies using species sensitivity distributions. Marked differences in susceptibility of fipronil were apparent among the supercolonies (P < 0.008), with the 'Japanese main supercolony' (271 μg L(-1)) being five to ten times more sensitive to fipronil than other colonies (1183-2782 μg L(-1)). Toxicities to non-target species (330-2327 μg L(-1)) were in the same range as that of L. humile, and SSDs between the two species groups were not significantly different (t = -1.389, P = 0.180), suggesting that fipronil's insecticidal activity is practically the same for L. humile as for non-target arthropods. Therefore, if the invasive ant is to be controlled using fipronil, this would also affect the local arthropod biodiversity. Only the 'Japanese main supercolony' can be controlled with appropriate bait dosages of fipronil that would have little impact on the other species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25980487     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-015-1483-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  37 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; J S Jaworska
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Cumulative ecological impacts of two successive annual treatments of imidacloprid and fipronil on aquatic communities of paddy mesocosms.

Authors:  D Hayasaka; T Korenaga; K Suzuki; F Saito; F Sánchez-Bayo; K Goka
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Toward a unified approach to dose-response modeling in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Christian Ritz
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Oral toxicity of abamectin, boric acid, fipronil, and hydramethylnon to laboratory colonies of Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

Authors:  L M Hooper-Bui; M K Rust
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Compatibility of entomopathogenic nematodes with fipronil.

Authors:  F García del Pino; M Jové
Journal:  J Helminthol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.170

6.  Relative roles of climatic suitability and anthropogenic influence in determining the pattern of spread in a global invader.

Authors:  Núria Roura-Pascual; Cang Hui; Takayoshi Ikeda; Gwénaël Leday; David M Richardson; Soledad Carpintero; Xavier Espadaler; Crisanto Gómez; Benoit Guénard; Stephen Hartley; Paul Krushelnycky; Philip J Lester; Melodie A McGeoch; Sean B Menke; Jes S Pedersen; Joel P W Pitt; Joaquin Reyes; Nathan J Sanders; Andrew V Suarez; Yoshifumi Touyama; Darren Ward; Philip S Ward; Sue P Worner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Among- and within-population variability in tolerance to cadmium stress in natural populations of Daphnia magna: implications for ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Carlos Barata; Donald J Baird; Sue E Mitchell; Amadeu M V M Soares
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 8.  The Argentine ant: challenges in managing an invasive unicolonial pest.

Authors:  Jules Silverman; Robert John Brightwell
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 19.686

9.  Compositional and functional stability of arthropod communities in the face of ant invasions.

Authors:  Paul D Krushelnycky; Rosemary G Gillespie
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Ant control efficacy of pyrethroids and fipronil on outdoor concrete surfaces.

Authors:  Weiying Jiang; Andrew Soeprono; Michael K Rust; Jay Gan
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.845

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intraspecific differences in the invasion success of the Argentine ant Linepithema humile Mayr are associated with diet breadth.

Authors:  Yugo Seko; Koya Hashimoto; Keisuke Koba; Daisuke Hayasaka; Takuo Sawahata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Fipronil application on rice paddy fields reduces densities of common skimmer and scarlet skimmer.

Authors:  Atsushi Kasai; Takehiko I Hayashi; Hitoshi Ohnishi; Kazutaka Suzuki; Daisuke Hayasaka; Koichi Goka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.