Literature DB >> 21969478

Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?

Rupert Fawdry1, Susan Bewley, Grant Cumming, Helga Perry.   

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of maternity information technology (IT) in Britain, questioning the usability, effectiveness and cost efficiency of the current models of implementation of electronic maternity records. UK experience of hand-held paper obstetric notes and computerized records reveals fundamental problems in the relationship between the two complementary methods of recording maternity data. The assumption that paper records would inevitably be replaced by electronic substitutes has proven false; the rigidity of analysable electronic records has led to immense incompatibility problems. The flexibility of paper records has distinct advantages that have so far not been sufficiently acknowledged. It is suggested that continuing work is needed to encourage the standardization of electronic maternity records, via a new co-creative, co-development approach and continuing international electronic community debate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969478      PMCID: PMC3184532          DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  27 in total

1.  Medical records. Holding the baby--and your notes.

Authors:  A Lovell; D Elbourne
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1987-03-19

2.  Magic and mayhem.

Authors:  Rupert Fawdry; Helga Perry; Susan Bewley; Grant Cumming
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The development and evaluation of a computerised antenatal questionnaire.

Authors:  R Fawdry
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.561

4.  Should women carry their antenatal records?

Authors:  J Draper; S Field; H Thomas; M J Hare
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-01

5.  Audit of medical response to antenatal booking history.

Authors:  K A Guthrie; F F Songane; F Mackenzie; R J Lilford
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1989-05

6.  The St. Thomas's Hospital maternity case notes study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the effects of giving expectant mothers their own maternity case notes.

Authors:  A Lovell; L I Zander; C E James; S Foot; A V Swan; A Reynolds
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  In whose interest is access to medical records withheld?

Authors:  A Lovell
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1987-07

8.  Histories obtained by two-stage questionnaire with automated transcript in specialist gynaecological practice.

Authors:  D W Robinson; G L Walmsley; J C Horrocks; P Milson; D M Jenkins; F T De Dombal; J S Scott
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-11-29

Review 9.  Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.

Authors:  H C Brown; H J Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

10.  The Newbury Maternity Care Study: a randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records.

Authors:  D Elbourne; M Richardson; I Chalmers; I Waterhouse; E Holt
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1987-07
View more
  4 in total

1.  Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity information technology?

Authors:  Paul J Curley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The development of a theory-based eHealth app prototype to promote oral health during prenatal care visits.

Authors:  Cheryl A Vamos; Stacey B Griner; Claire Kirchharr; Shana M Green; Rita DeBate; Ellen M Daley; Rocio B Quinonez; Kim A Boggess; Tom Jacobs; Steve Christiansen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Glenda Hawley; Tina Janamian; Claire Jackson; Shelley A Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Reporting errors, incidence and risk factors for postpartum haemorrhage and progression to severe PPH: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  A Briley; P T Seed; G Tydeman; H Ballard; M Waterstone; J Sandall; L Poston; R M Tribe; S Bewley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.