Literature DB >> 3506191

The St. Thomas's Hospital maternity case notes study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the effects of giving expectant mothers their own maternity case notes.

A Lovell1, L I Zander, C E James, S Foot, A V Swan, A Reynolds.   

Abstract

At an antenatal clinic in St. Thomas's Hospital, London, 246 expectant mothers were randomly allocated to hold either their own maternity case notes or the standard co-operation card. Information was collected on three occasions during their care on attitudes and health behaviour. Clinical outcomes were recorded and the effects of the two systems on clinic administration were observed. More of the notes group expressed satisfaction with most aspects of their care and delivery and significantly more of the notes group felt well informed and satisfied with their companion during labour. There were no differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups except that, for no identifiable systematic reason, there were more assisted deliveries among the notes group. A number of administrative advantages resulted from mothers holding their own notes and although initial reservations were found amongst professional staff interviewed at the start of the study, the results proved persuasive and the practice of giving mothers their own notes is now to be extended throughout the department.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3506191     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1987.tb00090.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  21 in total

Review 1.  Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?

Authors:  Rupert Fawdry; Susan Bewley; Grant Cumming; Helga Perry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  How well are parent held records kept and completed?

Authors:  K Saffin; A Macfarlane
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The right to know.

Authors:  P McLaren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-19

Review 4.  Improving communication between health professionals and women in maternity care: a structured review.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jo Garcia; Alison J Macfarlane; Leslie L Davidson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Attitudes towards, and utility of, an integrated medical-dental patient-held record in primary care.

Authors:  R Jones; J McConville; D Mason; L Macpherson; L Naven; J McEwen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.

Authors:  Heather C Brown; Helen J Smith; Rintaro Mori; Hisashi Noma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-14

7.  Trusting patients with case notes.

Authors:  D Elbourne; A Lovell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-01-30

Review 8.  Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Traber Davis Giardina; Shailaja Menon; Danielle E Parrish; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 9.  Patients' views on the effectiveness of patient-held records: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Samantha A Sartain; Samantha Stressing; Jacqui Prieto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Reducing stillbirths: behavioural and nutritional interventions before and during pregnancy.

Authors:  Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Rachel A Haws; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.