Literature DB >> 3304403

The Newbury Maternity Care Study: a randomized controlled trial to assess a policy of women holding their own obstetric records.

D Elbourne, M Richardson, I Chalmers, I Waterhouse, E Holt.   

Abstract

To assess a policy of women holding and thus having constant access to their own obstetric records, 290 women attending a peripheral consultant clinic in Newbury, West Berkshire, were randomly allocated to hold either their full case notes, or the more usual co-operation card. Women holding their full records were significantly more likely to feel in control of their antenatal care (rate ratio 1.45; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.95) and to feel it was easier to talk to doctors and midwives (rate ratio 1.73; 95% confidence interval 1.16-2.59). No other beneficial effects were detected. Asked about their preferences for any subsequent pregnancies, women holding their own records in the index pregnancy were more likely to say they would prefer to hold the same kind of record again in a subsequent pregnancy than were women holding a co-operation card (rate ratio 1.56; 95% confidence interval 1.34-1.81). There was no evidence of negative effects. In particular, women holding their case notes did not feel more anxious than co-operation card holders. The policy of women holding their notes resulted in savings in clerical time, without evidence of an increase in the rate of lost notes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Newbury Maternity Care Study; Professional Patient Relationship; West Berkshire

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3304403     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03165.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  30 in total

1.  Staff and family attitudes to keeping joint medical and nursing notes at the foot of the bed: questionnaire survey.

Authors:  S G Luke; A Gallagher; B W Lloyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  I am a good patient, believe it or not.

Authors:  Alejandro R Jadad; Carlos A Rizo; Murray W Enkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-14

Review 3.  Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?

Authors:  Rupert Fawdry; Susan Bewley; Grant Cumming; Helga Perry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Searching published reports.

Authors:  R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-01

Review 5.  Improving communication between health professionals and women in maternity care: a structured review.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jo Garcia; Alison J Macfarlane; Leslie L Davidson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Medical credit cards.

Authors:  S Jenkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19

7.  Attitudes towards, and utility of, an integrated medical-dental patient-held record in primary care.

Authors:  R Jones; J McConville; D Mason; L Macpherson; L Naven; J McEwen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Evaluation of an integrated community antenatal clinic.

Authors:  H Thomas; J Draper; S Field; M J Hare
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-12

Review 9.  Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy.

Authors:  Heather C Brown; Helen J Smith; Rintaro Mori; Hisashi Noma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-14

10.  Information exchange among physicians caring for the same patient in the community.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Monica Taljaard; Chaim M Bell; Edward Etchells; Kelly B Zarnke; Ian G Stiell; Alan J Forster
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.