Literature DB >> 21966308

Does the Pirani score predict relapse in clubfoot?

Vitali Goriainov, Julia Judd, Mike Uglow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Presented here is a retrospective clinical audit of clubfoot patients to determine the value of the Pirani clubfoot scoring system at initial presentation in the estimation of subsequent relapse.
METHODS: All clubfoot patients treated by the same surgeon from 2002 to 2006 were included. The treatment adhered to the standard protocol, involving weekly stretching and casting until the foot was corrected, followed by Achilles tenotomy and plasters for 3 weeks. Thereafter, the child was placed in a foot abduction splint. The severity of clubfoot was assessed using the Pirani scoring system, consisting of two sub-scores-the midfoot contracture score (MFCS) and the hindfoot contracture score (HFCS). The MFCS and HFCS can each be 0.0-3.0, giving rise to a total Pirani score (TPS) of 0.0-6.0. Any recurrent deformity was classed as a relapse.
RESULTS: Sixty-one clubfoot patients were treated. Five patients were lost to follow-up and six patients were excluded due to the presence of identified syndromes or having had primary treatment elsewhere. A total of 80 clubfeet were included. There were 17 relapses. The average interval between the initiation of foot abduction splint and relapse was 23 months. The median TPS was 3.5 in the no relapse group and 5.0 in the relapse group. The median MFCS was 1.5 in the no relapse group and 2.0 in the relapse group. The median HFCS was 2.0 in the no relapse group and 3.0 in the relapse group. Higher TPS and HFCS were statistically significant when the relapse group was analysed against the no relapse group (P = 0.05 × 10(-4) and 0.02 × 10(-4), respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher Pirani scores were associated with the late relapse group. The TPS and HFCS were shown to be statistically significant predictors of potential relapse. Closer follow-up is advised for patients at risk of relapse.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clubfoot; Pirani score; Ponseti treatment method; Relapse

Year:  2010        PMID: 21966308      PMCID: PMC2946533          DOI: 10.1007/s11832-010-0287-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


  11 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of congenital club foot.

Authors:  I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Treatment of the complex idiopathic clubfoot.

Authors:  Ignacio V Ponseti; Miroslav Zhivkov; Naomi Davis; Marc Sinclair; Matthew B Dobbs; Jose A Morcuende
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method.

Authors:  P J Dyer; N Davis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-08

4.  An independent assessment of two clubfoot-classification systems.

Authors:  J M Flynn; M Donohoe; W G Mackenzie
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Predicting the need for tenotomy in the Ponseti method for correction of clubfeet.

Authors:  David M Scher; David S Feldman; Harold J P van Bosse; Debra A Sala; Wallace B Lehman
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: minimum 5-year followup.

Authors:  Noam Bor; Julie A Coplan; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot.

Authors:  S J Laaveg; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Jose A Morcuende; Lori A Dolan; Frederick R Dietz; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet.

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; J R Rudzki; Derek B Purcell; Tim Walton; Kristina R Porter; Christina A Gurnett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method.

Authors:  B Stephens Richards; Shawne Faulks; Karl E Rathjen; Lori A Karol; Charles E Johnston; Sarah A Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Christof Radler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Does initial Pirani score and age influence number of Ponseti casts in children?

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Traditional and accelerated Ponseti technique: a comparative study.

Authors:  Hatem S A Elgohary; Mazen Abulsaad
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-01-30

4.  Comparison of Dimeglio and Pirani score in predicting number of casts and need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Manuele Lampasi; Caterina Novella Abati; Camilla Bettuzzi; Stefano Stilli; Giovanni Trisolino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Evolution of clubfoot deformity and muscle abnormality in the Ponseti method: evaluation with the Dimeglio score.

Authors:  Manuele Lampasi; Giovanni Trisolino; Caterina Novella Abati; Alessio Bosco; Leonardo Marchesini Reggiani; Costantina Racano; Stefano Stilli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Relapses in clubfoot treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol- a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Anuj Rastogi; Prateek Rastogi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-02

7.  Interobserver variability in Pirani clubfoot severity scoring system between the orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Saurabh Jain; Anand Ajmera; Mahendra Solanki; Alok Verma
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Clinical outcomes and risk-factor analysis of the Ponseti Method in a low-resource setting: Clubfoot care in Haiti.

Authors:  Rameez A Qudsi; Faith Selzer; Stephen C Hill; Ariel Lerner; Jean Wildric Hippolyte; Eldine Jacques; Francel Alexis; Collin J May; Robert B Cady; Elena Losina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Classification of relapse pattern in clubfoot treated with Ponseti technique.

Authors:  Atul Bhaskar; Piyush Patni
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Relapse following use of Ponseti method in idiopathic clubfoot.

Authors:  S Chand; A Mehtani; A Sud; J Prakash; A Sinha; A Agnihotri
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.