Literature DB >> 29594373

Comparison of Dimeglio and Pirani score in predicting number of casts and need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.

Manuele Lampasi1, Caterina Novella Abati2, Camilla Bettuzzi2, Stefano Stilli3, Giovanni Trisolino3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Dimeglio and the Pirani scores are largely used to rate clubfoot at presentation and monitor correction. To date, the accuracy of these scores in predicting appropriate treatment is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of Dimeglio and Pirani scores in predicting the number of casts and the need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.
METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive feet (54 patients; mean age at presentation: 28 ± 15 days) undergoing clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method were prospectively followed from first casting to correction. All feet were scored according to the Dimeglio and Pirani score. The relationships between the two scores, the number of casts and the need for tenotomy were analysed.
RESULTS: Initial correction was achieved in all feet. Both Dimeglio (r = .73; p value < .0005) and Pirani scores (r = .56; p value < .000) showed good association with the number of casts. Multiple linear regression showed a high collinearity of the two scores but a more significant contribution of the Dimeglio score. Among subcomponents, hindfoot score, midfoot score, varus and muscular abnormality were independent predictors of the number of casts. Both Dimeglio and Pirani scores were significantly associated with the need for tenotomy (p value = .0000), and odds ratios and cut-off points were calculated. The receiving operator curve (ROC) analysis showed slightly better performance of the Dimeglio in comparison with the Pirani score in predicting the need for tenotomy, but the difference between the two areas under the curve (AUC) was not significant (p = .48).
CONCLUSIONS: A quite accurate prediction of the number of casts and the need for tenotomy can be performed in most cases. The Dimeglio score showed slightly better accuracy in predicting both steps of Ponseti treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achilles tenotomy; Clubfoot; Dimeglio score; Pirani score; Ponseti method

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594373     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3873-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  37 in total

1.  The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method.

Authors:  P J Dyer; N Davis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-08

2.  Ultrasound evaluation of clubfoot correction during Ponseti treatment: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sameer Desai; Alaric Aroojis; Rujuta Mehta
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Bilateral clubfeet are highly correlated: a cautionary tale for researchers.

Authors:  Kelly Gray; Paul Gibbons; David Little; Joshua Burns
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  An accelerated Ponseti versus the standard Ponseti method: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Harnett; R Freeman; W J Harrison; L C Brown; V Beckles
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-03

5.  Inter-rater reliability of physiotherapists using the Pirani scoring system for clubfoot: comparison with a modified five-point scale.

Authors:  Nicole J Harvey; Anita J Mudge; Deborah T Daley; Susan K Sims; Roger D Adams
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Evertor muscle activity as a predictor of the mid-term outcome following treatment of the idiopathic and non-idiopathic clubfoot.

Authors:  Y Gelfer; M Dunkley; D Jackson; J Armstrong; C Rafter; E Parnell; D M Eastwood
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Evolution of clubfoot deformity and muscle abnormality in the Ponseti method: evaluation with the Dimeglio score.

Authors:  Manuele Lampasi; Giovanni Trisolino; Caterina Novella Abati; Alessio Bosco; Leonardo Marchesini Reggiani; Costantina Racano; Stefano Stilli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Predicting the need for tenotomy in the Ponseti method for correction of clubfeet.

Authors:  David M Scher; David S Feldman; Harold J P van Bosse; Debra A Sala; Wallace B Lehman
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Jose A Morcuende; Lori A Dolan; Frederick R Dietz; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Relapse of clubfoot after treatment with the Ponseti method and the function of the foot abduction orthosis.

Authors:  Dahang Zhao; Jianlin Liu; Li Zhao; Zhenkai Wu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-08-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  Correlation of age and severity scores to the number of Ponseti casts in Indian infants with clubfeet.

Authors:  Prateek Rastogi; Anil Agarwal; Satyam Singh; Chaitanaya Prakash Meena; Neeraj Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-06-26

2.  The PBS Score - a clinical assessment tool for the ambulatory and recurrent clubfoot.

Authors:  S Böhm; M F Sinclair
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

3.  Interobserver reliability of Diméglio and Pirani score and their subcomponents in the evaluation of idiopathic clubfoot in a clinical setting: a need for improved scoring systems.

Authors:  C Bettuzzi; C N Abati; G Salvatori; A Zanardi; M Lampasi
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Can clubfoot scoring systems predict the number of casts and future recurrences in patients undergoing Ponseti method?

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Tahririan; Mohammadreza Piri Ardakani; Sara Kheiri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  A modification of the Ponseti method for clubfoot management: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Reda Ali Sheta; Mohamed El-Sayed; Hisham Abdel-Ghani; Sameh Saber; Amani Salah Eldin Mohammed; Tohamy Gouda Tohamy Hassan
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Correlation of scores with number of Ponseti casts required for clubfoot correction in the older child.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal; Mukesh Shanker
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.