Literature DB >> 27349648

Evolution of clubfoot deformity and muscle abnormality in the Ponseti method: evaluation with the Dimeglio score.

Manuele Lampasi1, Giovanni Trisolino2, Caterina Novella Abati3, Alessio Bosco2, Leonardo Marchesini Reggiani2, Costantina Racano2, Stefano Stilli2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The modality of progression of the correction along casting sessions of Ponseti method has been poorly investigated and information regarding evolution of muscular abnormalities is missing. The aim of the study was to investigate dynamics of correction of the different components of clubfoot deformity in a clinical setting.
METHODS: In a prospective study, 124 clubfeet consecutively treated by a single orthopaedic surgeon were evaluated with the Dimeglio system at each casting session and score progression was determined.
RESULTS: For each component a typical pattern was recorded. Cavus and medial crease showed a rapid correction. Rotation, adduction and varus corrected gradually and simultaneously. The posterior crease usually persisted until final cast was discontinued. Equinus improved progressively after each cast and then to a larger extent with Achilles tenotomy. The parameter describing poor muscular condition, reported at presentation in 39 feet (31.5%), was the only item showing extremely different dynamics of correction (from rapid and complete resolution to persistence at last cast removal), which could be explained by the large diversity of entities included (hypertonia, imbalance, fatty infiltration, fibrosis, aplasia).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that dynamics of correction in clinical setting correspond essentially to theoretical principles of Ponseti method. Muscle abnormalities are not uncommon in clubfeet and have great influence on the progression of correction. If abnormalities are recorded, their evolution along the treatment should be monitored. A more objective evaluation would be required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dimeglio score; Idiopathic clubfoot; Muscle; Ponseti method; Progression

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27349648     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3244-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  35 in total

1.  Ultrasound of the navicular during the simulated Ponseti maneuver.

Authors:  Lawrence R Kuhns; Khaldoun Koujok; Janette M Hall; Clifford Craig
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 2.  The French functional physical therapy method for the treatment of congenital clubfoot.

Authors:  Alain Dimeglio; Federico Canavese
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Ultrasound evaluation of clubfoot correction during Ponseti treatment: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sameer Desai; Alaric Aroojis; Rujuta Mehta
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Ponseti method for late presentation of clubfoot.

Authors:  Anil Agarwal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Transfer of the tendon of tibialis anterior in relapsed congenital clubfoot: long-term results in 38 feet.

Authors:  M Lampasi; C Bettuzzi; M Palmonari; O Donzelli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-02

6.  Evertor muscle activity as a predictor of the mid-term outcome following treatment of the idiopathic and non-idiopathic clubfoot.

Authors:  Y Gelfer; M Dunkley; D Jackson; J Armstrong; C Rafter; E Parnell; D M Eastwood
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Evaluation of the treatment of clubfeet with the Diméglio score.

Authors:  J M van Mulken; S K Bulstra; N H Hoefnagels
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Jose A Morcuende; Lori A Dolan; Frederick R Dietz; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Leg muscle atrophy in idiopathic congenital clubfoot: is it primitive or acquired?

Authors:  Ernesto Ippolito; F De Maio; F Mancini; D Bellini; A Orefice
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 10.  Relapse of clubfoot after treatment with the Ponseti method and the function of the foot abduction orthosis.

Authors:  Dahang Zhao; Jianlin Liu; Li Zhao; Zhenkai Wu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-08-05
View more
  5 in total

1.  The impact of different types of talus deformation after treatment of clubfeet.

Authors:  Alexander Kolb; Madeleine Willegger; Reinhard Schuh; Alexandra Kaider; Catharina Chiari; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of Dimeglio and Pirani score in predicting number of casts and need for tenotomy in clubfoot correction using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Manuele Lampasi; Caterina Novella Abati; Camilla Bettuzzi; Stefano Stilli; Giovanni Trisolino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Flat Top Talus: Complication of Ponseti Method or Overcorrection?

Authors:  Shahbaz Khan; Mansoor Ali Khan; Muhammad Amin Chinoy; Sadia Ahmed
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-17

Review 4.  From Codivilla to Ponseti: historical narrative review on clubfoot treatment in Italy.

Authors:  Flavia Alberghina; Gianluca Testa; Sergio Monforte; Vito Pavone; Antonio Andreacchio
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

5.  Interobserver reliability of Diméglio and Pirani score and their subcomponents in the evaluation of idiopathic clubfoot in a clinical setting: a need for improved scoring systems.

Authors:  C Bettuzzi; C N Abati; G Salvatori; A Zanardi; M Lampasi
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.