Literature DB >> 34026487

Relapses in clubfoot treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol- a systematic analysis.

Anil Agarwal1, Anuj Rastogi2, Prateek Rastogi3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The analysis determined the relapses in clubfoot children treated with Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol and their correlation with overall follow up duration using pooled data from various series. It also tested the prescribed timelines of 5 and 7 years for slow-down/cessation of relapses in clubfoot children.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for articles published in "Pubmed (includes Medline indexed journals)" electronic databases using key words: "Clubfoot or CTEV or congenital talipes equinovarus", "Ponseti" for years 1st January 2001 to 15th November 2020. Included were studies that addressed treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the standard Ponseti technique, followed a well defined brace protocol (maintenance of corrected deformity using a central bar based brace and prescribed duration mentioned), reported a minimum mean follow up of 4 years and having relapse as one of their outcome measure. Studies reporting Ponseti technique for non-idiopathic clubfoot, child's age older than 1 year at the time of primary treatment, clubfoot with previous interventions before Ponseti treatment, where relapse and residual deformities were not identified distinctly in follow up, abstract only publications, letter to the editors, case reports, technique papers and review articles were excluded. The following characteristics of clubfoot patients in the selected articles were included for analysis: Patient numbers/feet treated with Ponseti technique; follow up years (<5; 5-7 and >7 years; overall) and corresponding relapse percentages for patients.
RESULTS: There were total 2206 patients in the included 24 studies. Average follow up was 6 years. The average relapse rates for clubfoot patients in the pooled data stood at 30%. The overall relapse rates increased with a longer follow up and the curve befitted a linear regression equation with weak positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.08). The relapse rates in follow up categories of <5 years (26.6 ± 15.6%), 5-7 years (30.8 ± 16.3%) and >7 years (28.4 ± 6.2%) were similar statistically (Analysis of variance, ANOVA).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 3 clubfoot patients suffer relapse post Ponseti technique and standard bracing protocol. A weak positive correlation was observed for relapses when correlated with increasing follow up years. The relapses however tend to slow down after initial growth years. There is a need to educate the care receivers regarding the possibility of late relapses despite proper Ponseti treatment and accordingly to keep them under supervised follow up for longer periods.
© 2021 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brace; Clubfoot; Orthosis; Ponseti technique; Relapse

Year:  2021        PMID: 34026487      PMCID: PMC8122108          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  49 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of congenital club foot.

Authors:  I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Bracing following correction of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method.

Authors:  Lewis E Zionts; Frederick R Dietz
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Reoccurrence rate in Ponseti treated clubfeet: A meta-regression.

Authors:  Juanita Wallace; Hank White; Joel Eastman; Sam Augsburger; Xi Ma; Janet Walker
Journal:  Foot (Edinb)       Date:  2019-03-13

4.  Clubfoot Treatment in High and Low-Income Regions Produces Functional Feet: Commentary on articles by Kelly A. Jeans, MS, et al.: "Functional Outcomes Following Treatment for Clubfoot. Ten-Year Follow-up," and Bibek Banskota, MRCS, MS, et al.: "Outcomes of the Ponseti Method for Untreated Clubfeet in Nepalese Patients Seen Between the Ages of One and Five Years and Followed for at Least 10 Years".

Authors:  James G Wright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Results of clubfoot management using the Ponseti method: do the details matter? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dahang Zhao; Hai Li; Li Zhao; Jianlin Liu; Zhenkai Wu; Fangchun Jin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Orthosis noncompliance after the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet: a relevant problem that needs reevaluation.

Authors:  Norman Ramírez; John M Flynn; Samuel Fernández; Wallace Seda; Raul E Macchiavelli
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Long-term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols.

Authors:  E Ippolito; P Farsetti; R Caterini; C Tudisco
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Late recurrence of clubfoot deformity: a 45-year followup.

Authors:  Matthew B Dobbs; Carey L Corley; Jose A Morcuende; Ignacio V Ponseti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparison of the short-term and long-term results of the Ponseti method in the treatment of idiopathic pes equinovarus.

Authors:  Martin Ošťádal; Jiri Chomiak; Pavel Dungl; Monika Frydrychová; Michal Burian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Timing for Ponseti clubfoot management: does the age matter? 90 children (131 feet) with a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Yu-Bin Liu; Song-Jian Li; Li Zhao; Bo Yu; Da-Hang Zhao
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.