Literature DB >> 21965403

National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.

Laura J Rose1, Lisa Hodges, Heather O'Connell, Judith Noble-Wang.   

Abstract

This work was initiated to address the gaps identified by Congress regarding validated biothreat environmental sampling and processing methods. Nine Laboratory Response Network-affiliated laboratories participated in a validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing protocol for the recovery, detection, and quantification of viable Bacillus anthracis Sterne spores from steel surfaces. Steel coupons (645.16 cm(2)) were inoculated with 1 to 4 log(10) spores and then sampled with cellulose sponges (Sponge-Stick; 3M, St. Paul, MN). Surrogate dust and background organisms were added to the sponges to mimic environmental conditions. Labs processed the sponges according to the provided protocol. Sensitivity, specificity, and mean percent recovery (%R), between-lab variability, within-lab variability, and total percent coefficient of variation were calculated. The mean %R (standard error) of spores from the surface was 32.4 (4.4), 24.4 (2.8), and 30.1 (2.3) for the 1-, 2-, and 4-log(10) inoculum levels, respectively. Sensitivities for colony counts were 84.1%, 100%, and 100% for the 1-, 2-, and 4-log(10) inocula, respectively. These data help to characterize the variability of the processing method and thereby enhance confidence in the interpretation of the results of environmental sampling conducted during a B. anthracis contamination investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21965403      PMCID: PMC3233038          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.05377-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of a macrofoam swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from a steel surface.

Authors:  L R Hodges; L J Rose; A Peterson; J Noble-Wang; M J Arduino
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Heat activation/shock temperatures for Bacillus anthracis spores and the issue of spore plate counts versus true numbers of spores.

Authors:  Peter C B Turnbull; Dody A Frawley; Robert L Bull
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Validation of a nylon-flocked-swab protocol for efficient recovery of bacterial spores from smooth and rough surfaces.

Authors:  Alexander Probst; Rainer Facius; Reinhard Wirth; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Evaluation of a wipe surface sample method for collection of Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces.

Authors:  Gary S Brown; Rita G Betty; John E Brockmann; Daniel A Lucero; Caroline A Souza; Kathryn S Walsh; Raymond M Boucher; Mathew Tezak; Mollye C Wilson; Todd Rudolph
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evaluation of the Biological Sampling Kit (BiSKit) for large-area surface sampling.

Authors:  Mark P Buttner; Patricia Cruz; Linda D Stetzenbach; Amy K Klima-Comba; Vanessa L Stevens; Peter A Emanuel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces.

Authors:  G S Brown; R G Betty; J E Brockmann; D A Lucero; C A Souza; K S Walsh; R M Boucher; M S Tezak; M C Wilson; T Rudolph; H D A Lindquist; K F Martinez
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Evaluation of sampling tools for environmental sampling of bacterial endospores from porous and nonporous surfaces.

Authors:  N B Valentine; M G Butcher; Y-F Su; K H Jarman; M Matzke; B-J Webb-Robertson; E A Panisko; B A B Seiders; K L Wahl
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Evaluation of two surface sampling methods for detection of Erwinia herbicola on a variety of materials by culture and quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Mark P Buttner; Patricia Cruz; Linda D Stetzenbach; Tracy Cronin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Swab materials and Bacillus anthracis spore recovery from nonporous surfaces.

Authors:  Laura Rose; Bette Jensen; Alicia Peterson; Shailen N Banerjee; Matthew J Srduino
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Surface sampling methods for Bacillus anthracis spore contamination.

Authors:  Wayne T Sanderson; Misty J Hein; Lauralynn Taylor; Brian D Curwin; Gregory M Kinnes; Teresa A Seitz; Tanja Popovic; Harvey T Holmes; Molly E Kellum; Sigrid K McAllister; David N Whaley; Edward A Tupin; Timothy Walker; Jennifer A Freed; Dorothy S Small; Brian Klusaritz; John H Bridges
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  27 in total

1.  Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Autumn S Downey; Sandra M Da Silva; Nathan D Olson; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of Two Glove-Sampling Methods to Discriminate Between Study Arms of a Hand Hygiene and Glove-Use Study.

Authors:  Gwen L Robinson; Linda Otieno; J Kristie Johnson; Laura J Rose; Anthony D Harris; Judith Noble-Wang; Kerri A Thom
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Sample processing approach for detection of ricin in surface samples.

Authors:  Staci Kane; Sanjiv Shah; Anne Marie Erler; Teneile Alfaro
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  False-negative rate and recovery efficiency performance of a validated sponge wipe sampling method.

Authors:  Paula A Krauter; Greg F Piepel; Raymond Boucher; Matt Tezak; Brett G Amidan; Wayne Einfeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparison of surface sampling methods for an extended duration outdoor biological contamination study.

Authors:  Anne M Mikelonis; Ahmed Abdel-Hady; Denise Aslett; Katherine Ratliff; Abderrahmane Touati; John Archer; Shannon Serre; Leroy Mickelsen; Sarah Taft; M W Calfee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Development of a rapid viability polymerase chain reaction method for detection of Yersinia pestis.

Authors:  Staci R Kane; Sanjiv R Shah; Teneile M Alfaro
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  Development of a rapid-viability PCR method for detection of Clostridioides difficile spores from environmental samples.

Authors:  Alicia M Shams; Laura J Rose; Judith A Noble-Wang
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.331

8.  Alternative fast analysis method for cellulose sponge surface sampling wipes with low concentrations of Bacillus Spores.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel-Hady; M Worth Calfee; Denise Aslett; Sang Don Lee; Barbara Wyrzykowska-Ceradini; F Robbins Delafield; Kathleen May; Abderrahmane Touati
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.363

9.  Evaluation of standardized sample collection, packaging, and decontamination procedures to assess cross-contamination potential during Bacillus anthracis incident response operations.

Authors:  M Worth Calfee; Jenia Tufts; Kathryn Meyer; Katrina McConkey; Leroy Mickelsen; Laura Rose; Chad Dowell; Lisa Delaney; Angela Weber; Stephen Morse; Jasmine Chaitram; Marshall Gray
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Extraction of Aerosol-Deposited Yersinia pestis from Indoor Surfaces To Determine Bacterial Environmental Decay.

Authors:  Ian M Gut; Ryan A Bartlett; John J Yeager; Brian Leroux; Shanna Ratnesar-Shumate; Paul Dabisch; David K R Karaolis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.