Literature DB >> 27362274

Evaluation of standardized sample collection, packaging, and decontamination procedures to assess cross-contamination potential during Bacillus anthracis incident response operations.

M Worth Calfee1, Jenia Tufts2, Kathryn Meyer2, Katrina McConkey3, Leroy Mickelsen4, Laura Rose5, Chad Dowell6, Lisa Delaney6, Angela Weber6, Stephen Morse7, Jasmine Chaitram8, Marshall Gray1.   

Abstract

Sample collection procedures and primary receptacle (sample container and bag) decontamination methods should prevent contaminant transfer between contaminated and non-contaminated surfaces and areas during bio-incident operations. Cross-contamination of personnel, equipment, or sample containers may result in the exfiltration of biological agent from the exclusion (hot) zone and have unintended negative consequences on response resources, activities and outcomes. The current study was designed to: (1) evaluate currently recommended sample collection and packaging procedures to identify procedural steps that may increase the likelihood of spore exfiltration or contaminant transfer; (2) evaluate the efficacy of currently recommended primary receptacle decontamination procedures; and (3) evaluate the efficacy of outer packaging decontamination methods. Wet- and dry-deposited fluorescent tracer powder was used in contaminant transfer tests to qualitatively evaluate the currently-recommended sample collection procedures. Bacillus atrophaeus spores, a surrogate for Bacillus anthracis, were used to evaluate the efficacy of spray- and wipe-based decontamination procedures. Both decontamination procedures were quantitatively evaluated on three types of sample packaging materials (corrugated fiberboard, polystyrene foam, and polyethylene plastic), and two contamination mechanisms (wet or dry inoculums). Contaminant transfer results suggested that size-appropriate gloves should be worn by personnel, templates should not be taped to or removed from surfaces, and primary receptacles should be selected carefully. The decontamination tests indicated that wipe-based decontamination procedures may be more effective than spray-based procedures; efficacy was not influenced by material type but was affected by the inoculation method. Incomplete surface decontamination was observed in all tests with dry inoculums. This study provides a foundation for optimizing current B. anthracis response procedures to minimize contaminant exfiltration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus anthracis; cross-contamination; decontamination; sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27362274      PMCID: PMC5152577          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1200725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  33 in total

Review 1.  Use of qualitative and quantitative fluorescence techniques to assess dermal exposure.

Authors:  J W Cherrie; D H Brouwer; M Roff; R Vermeulen; H Kromhout
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2000-10

2.  Total decontamination cost of the anthrax letter attacks.

Authors:  Ketra Schmitt; Nicholas A Zacchia
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2012-02-07

3.  Laboratory evaluation of large-scale decontamination approaches.

Authors:  M W Calfee; S P Ryan; J P Wood; L Mickelsen; C Kempter; L Miller; M Colby; A Touati; M Clayton; N Griffin-Gatchalian; S McDonald; R Delafield
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.772

4.  Bacterial contamination of keyboards: efficacy and functional impact of disinfectants.

Authors:  William A Rutala; Matthew S White; Maria F Gergen; David J Weber
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Comparing surface residue transfer efficiencies to hands using polar and nonpolar fluorescent tracers.

Authors:  Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Marcia G Nishioka; William A Ivancic; Michele Morara; Peter P Egeghy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Occurrence of bacteria and biochemical markers on public surfaces.

Authors:  Kelly A Reynolds; Pamela M Watt; Stephanie A Boone; Charles P Gerba
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.

Authors:  Laura J Rose; Lisa Hodges; Heather O'Connell; Judith Noble-Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Multigeneration cross contamination of mail with Bacillus species spores by tumbling.

Authors:  Jason Edmonds; Paul Clark; Leslie Williams; H D Alan Lindquist; Kenneth Martinez; Warren Gardner; Sean Shadomy; Jennifer Hornsby-Myers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Bacillus anthracis contamination and inhalational anthrax in a mail processing and distribution center.

Authors:  W T Sanderson; R R Stoddard; A S Echt; C A Piacitelli; D Kim; J Horan; M M Davies; R E McCleery; P Muller; T M Schnorr; E M Ward; T R Hales
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax: the first 10 cases reported in the United States.

Authors:  J A Jernigan; D S Stephens; D A Ashford; C Omenaca; M S Topiel; M Galbraith; M Tapper; T L Fisk; S Zaki; T Popovic; R F Meyer; C P Quinn; S A Harper; S K Fridkin; J J Sejvar; C W Shepard; M McConnell; J Guarner; W J Shieh; J M Malecki; J L Gerberding; J M Hughes; B A Perkins
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does Gender Influence Physiological Tolerance in Resuscitators When Using Personal Protection Equipment against Biological Hazards?

Authors:  Francisco Martín-Rodríguez; José Luis Martín Conty; Verónica Casado Vicente; Pedro Arnillas Gómez; Alicia Mohedano-Moriano; Miguel Ángel Castro Villamor
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.112

2.  Factors Affecting the Decontamination Process in Hospitals in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ebaa M Felemban; Hanan A M Youssef; Abdulellah Al Thobaity
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  The Evaluation of Physiological Index Changes and Safety Work of Female Medical Staff With Different Medical Protection Standards in the Ward of COVID-19.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Jianhui Zhao; Junbing Yan; Xiaoye Gao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.