Literature DB >> 17897212

Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces.

G S Brown1, R G Betty, J E Brockmann, D A Lucero, C A Souza, K S Walsh, R M Boucher, M S Tezak, M C Wilson, T Rudolph, H D A Lindquist, K F Martinez.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended swab surface sample collection method for recovery efficiency and limit of detection for powdered Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Stainless steel and painted wallboard surface coupons were seeded with dry aerosolized Bacillus atrophaeus spores and surface concentrations determined. The observed mean rayon swab recovery efficiency from stainless steel was 0.41 with a standard deviation (SD) of +/-0.17 and for painted wallboard was 0.41 with an SD of +/-0.23. Evaluation of a sonication extraction method for the rayon swabs produced a mean extraction efficiency of 0.76 with an SD of +/-0.12. Swab recovery quantitative limits of detection were estimated at 25 colony forming units (CFU) per sample area for both stainless steel and painted wallboard.
CONCLUSIONS: The swab sample collection method may be appropriate for small area sampling (10 -25 cm2) with a high agent concentration, but has limited value for large surface areas with a low agent concentration. The results of this study provide information necessary for the interpretation of swab environmental sample collection data, that is, positive swab samples are indicative of high surface concentrations and may imply a potential for exposure, whereas negative swab samples do not assure that organisms are absent from the surfaces sampled and may not assure the absence of the potential for exposure. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: It is critical from a public health perspective that the information obtained is accurate and reproducible. The consequence of an inappropriate public health response founded on information gathered using an ineffective or unreliable sample collection method has the potential for undesired social and economic impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17897212     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  16 in total

1.  Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Autumn S Downey; Sandra M Da Silva; Nathan D Olson; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Validation of a nylon-flocked-swab protocol for efficient recovery of bacterial spores from smooth and rough surfaces.

Authors:  Alexander Probst; Rainer Facius; Reinhard Wirth; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  False-negative rate and recovery efficiency performance of a validated sponge wipe sampling method.

Authors:  Paula A Krauter; Greg F Piepel; Raymond Boucher; Matt Tezak; Brett G Amidan; Wayne Einfeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.

Authors:  Laura J Rose; Lisa Hodges; Heather O'Connell; Judith Noble-Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Development of an aerosol surface inoculation method for bacillus spores.

Authors:  Sang Don Lee; Shawn P Ryan; Emily Gibb Snyder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of swab and sponge methodologies for identification of Acinetobacter baumannii from the hospital environment.

Authors:  Kerri A Thom; Tracy Howard; Sophie Sembajwe; Anthony D Harris; Paula Strassle; Brian S Caffo; Karen C Carroll; J Kristie Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Parameters affecting spore recovery from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Sandra M Da Silva; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Alternative fast analysis method for cellulose sponge surface sampling wipes with low concentrations of Bacillus Spores.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel-Hady; M Worth Calfee; Denise Aslett; Sang Don Lee; Barbara Wyrzykowska-Ceradini; F Robbins Delafield; Kathleen May; Abderrahmane Touati
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.363

9.  Recovery efficiency and limit of detection of aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from environmental surface samples.

Authors:  Cheryl Fairfield Estill; Paul A Baron; Jeremy K Beard; Misty J Hein; Lloyd D Larsen; Laura Rose; Frank W Schaefer; Judith Noble-Wang; Lisa Hodges; H D Alan Lindquist; Gregory J Deye; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Implications of limits of detection of various methods for Bacillus anthracis in computing risks to human health.

Authors:  Amanda B Herzog; S Devin McLennan; Alok K Pandey; Charles P Gerba; Charles N Haas; Joan B Rose; Syed A Hashsham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.