Literature DB >> 17416685

Evaluation of two surface sampling methods for detection of Erwinia herbicola on a variety of materials by culture and quantitative PCR.

Mark P Buttner1, Patricia Cruz, Linda D Stetzenbach, Tracy Cronin.   

Abstract

This research was designed to evaluate surface sampling protocols for use with culture and quantitative PCR (QPCR) amplification assay for detection of the gram-negative bacterial biothreat simulant Erwinia herbicola on a variety of surface materials. Surfaces selected for evaluation were wood laminate, glass and computer monitor screens, metal file cabinets, plastic arena seats, nylon seat cushions, finished concrete flooring, and vinyl tile flooring. Laboratory and test chamber studies were performed to evaluate two sampling methods, a sponge and a macrofoam swab, for detection of E. herbicola on surface materials. In laboratory trials, seven materials were inoculated with a known concentration of E. herbicola cells and samples were collected from the surfaces of the materials to determine sampling efficiencies. Culture analysis was ineffective for assessing E. herbicola collection efficiency because very few culturable cells were obtained from surface samples. QPCR demonstrated that E. herbicola DNA was present in high concentrations on all of the surface samples, and sampling efficiencies ranged from 0.7 to 52.2%, depending on the sampling method and the surface material. The swab was generally more efficient than the sponge for collection of E. herbicola from surfaces. Test chamber trials were also performed in which E. herbicola was aerosolized into the chamber and allowed to settle onto test materials. Surface sampling results supported those obtained in laboratory trials. The results of this study demonstrate the capabilities of QPCR to enhance the detection and enumeration of biocontaminants on surface materials and provide information on the comparability of sampling methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17416685      PMCID: PMC1932667          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01825-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  11 in total

1.  Enhanced detection of surface-associated bacteria in indoor environments by quantitative PCR.

Authors:  M P Buttner; P Cruz-Perez; L D Stetzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Secondary aerosolization of viable Bacillus anthracis spores in a contaminated US Senate Office.

Authors:  Christopher P Weis; Anthony J Intrepido; Aubrey K Miller; Patricia G Cowin; Mark A Durno; Joan S Gebhardt; Robert Bull
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Survival of Yersinia pestis on environmental surfaces.

Authors:  Laura J Rose; Rodney Donlan; Shailen N Banerjee; Matthew J Arduino
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Airborne bacteria and viruses.

Authors:  C S Cox
Journal:  Sci Prog       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.774

5.  Wipe-rinse technique for quantitating microbial contamination on large surfaces.

Authors:  L E Kirschner; J R Puleo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evaluation of the Biological Sampling Kit (BiSKit) for large-area surface sampling.

Authors:  Mark P Buttner; Patricia Cruz; Linda D Stetzenbach; Amy K Klima-Comba; Vanessa L Stevens; Peter A Emanuel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Determination of the efficacy of two building decontamination strategies by surface sampling with culture and quantitative PCR analysis.

Authors:  Mark P Buttner; Patricia Cruz; Linda D Stetzenbach; Amy K Klima-Comba; Vanessa L Stevens; Tracy D Cronin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling.

Authors:  M P Buttner; L D Stetzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  A field investigation of Bacillus anthracis contamination of U.S. Department of Agriculture and other Washington, D.C., buildings during the anthrax attack of October 2001.

Authors:  James A Higgins; Mary Cooper; Linda Schroeder-Tucker; Scott Black; David Miller; Jeffrey S Karns; Erlynn Manthey; Roger Breeze; Michael L Perdue
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Surface sampling methods for Bacillus anthracis spore contamination.

Authors:  Wayne T Sanderson; Misty J Hein; Lauralynn Taylor; Brian D Curwin; Gregory M Kinnes; Teresa A Seitz; Tanja Popovic; Harvey T Holmes; Molly E Kellum; Sigrid K McAllister; David N Whaley; Edward A Tupin; Timothy Walker; Jennifer A Freed; Dorothy S Small; Brian Klusaritz; John H Bridges
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  12 in total

1.  Impact of processing method on recovery of bacteria from wipes used in biological surface sampling.

Authors:  Autumn S Downey; Sandra M Da Silva; Nathan D Olson; James J Filliben; Jayne B Morrow
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A New Wipe-Sampling Instrument for Measuring the Collection Efficiency of Trace Explosives Residues.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Robinson; Edward Sisco; Matthew E Staymates; Jeffrey A Lawrence
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Possible overestimation of surface disinfection efficiency by assessment methods based on liquid sampling procedures as demonstrated by in situ quantification of spore viability.

Authors:  I Grand; M-N Bellon-Fontaine; J-M Herry; D Hilaire; F-X Moriconi; M Naïtali
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  An Overview on Novel Microbial Determination Methods in Pharmaceutical and Food Quality Control.

Authors:  Mahboob Nemati; Aliasghar Hamidi; Solmaz Maleki Dizaj; Vahid Javaherzadeh; Farzaneh Lotfipour
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2016-09-25

5.  Effect of Surface Sampling and Recovery of Viruses and Non-Spore-Forming Bacteria on a Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Model for Fomites.

Authors:  Mark H Weir; Tomoyuki Shibata; Yoshifumi Masago; Dena L Cologgi; Joan B Rose
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.

Authors:  Laura J Rose; Lisa Hodges; Heather O'Connell; Judith Noble-Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Use of a foam spatula for sampling surfaces after bioaerosol deposition.

Authors:  Rafal Lewandowski; Krystyna Kozlowska; Malgorzata Szpakowska; Malgorzata Stepinska; Elzbieta A Trafny
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Suitability of Commercial Transport Media for Biological Pathogens under Nonideal Conditions.

Authors:  Kyle Hubbard; Gregory Pellar; Peter Emanuel
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-30

9.  Experimental Study to Develop a Method for Improving Sample Collection to Monitor Laryngoscopes after Reprocessing.

Authors:  Savina Ditommaso; Monica Giacomuzzi; Elisa Ricciardi; Carla Zotti
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2018-08-21

10.  Comparison of qPCR versus culture for the detection and quantification of Clostridium difficile environmental contamination.

Authors:  Laura K MacDougall; George Broukhanski; Andrew Simor; Jennie Johnstone; Samira Mubareka; Allison McGeer; Nick Daneman; Gary Garber; Kevin A Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.