Literature DB >> 21964768

Proficiency in the diagnosis of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm yields high adenoma detection rates.

Tonya Kaltenbach1, Sarah K McGill, Venkat Kalidindi, Shai Friedland, Roy Soetikno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current efforts to prevent colorectal cancer focus on the detection and removal of neoplasms. Nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasms (NP-CRN) have a subtle appearance that can be difficult to recognize during colonoscopy. Endoscopists must first be familiar with the patterns of NP-CRN in order to detect and diagnose them. We studied the adenoma detection rates of endoscopists who had trained to detect NP-CRN, versus endoscopists who had not.
DESIGN: Retrospective Nested Case Control Study.
SETTING: Outpatient Screening Colonoscopy. PARTICIPANTS: Adult Veterans. INTERVENTION: Proficiency in the features and diagnosis of NP-CRN. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS: Adenoma detection.
RESULTS: In total, 462 patients had screening colonoscopies-267 by colonoscopists who had trained in the features and diagnosis of NP-CRN. Patient characteristics were similar between groups-the majority were men with a mean age of 62 ± 6 years. Neoplasia was more prevalent (45.7 vs. 34.9%; p = 0.02) in patients evaluated by the trained compared to the conventionally trained group. Trained colonoscopists had a higher adenoma detection rate (0.76 vs. 0.54 adenomas per patient, p < 0.001); removed a higher proportion of neoplasia (77 vs. 35%, p < 0.001); and more frequently diagnosed NP-CRN lesions (OR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.46-6.08) compared to colonoscopists without supplemental training.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists who are proficient in the detection of NP-CRN had significantly higher adenoma detection rates-of both polypoid and flat adenomas-compared to endoscopists without training, and were more specific in resection of adenomatous over hyperplastic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964768     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1921-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  25 in total

1.  Colonoscopy vs sigmoidoscopy screening: getting it right.

Authors:  Alfred I Neugut; Benjamin Lebwohl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  High-magnification colonoscopy (with videos).

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Tonya Kaltenbach; Kazuaki Chayama; Roy Soetikno
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Editorial: Interval cancers after colonoscopy: the importance of training.

Authors:  John Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Jaroslaw Regula; Ewa Kraszewska; Marcin Polkowski; Urszula Wojciechowska; Joanna Didkowska; Maria Zwierko; Maciej Rupinski; Marek P Nowacki; Eugeniusz Butruk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial.

Authors:  Jürgen Pohl; Arved Schneider; Hartmut Vogell; Gerhard Mayer; Gernot Kaiser; Christian Ell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Flat lesions of the colorectal mucosa: differences in recognition between Japanese and American endoscopists.

Authors:  James M Church; Tetsuchiro Muto; Kweku Appau
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study.

Authors:  K-I Fu; Y Sano; S Kato; T Fujii; F Nagashima; T Yoshino; T Okuno; S Yoshida; T Fujimori
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Rob McCarney; James Warner; Steve Iliffe; Robbert van Haselen; Mark Griffin; Peter Fisher
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  6 in total

1.  Polyp morphology: an interobserver evaluation for the Paris classification among international experts.

Authors:  Sascha C van Doorn; Y Hazewinkel; James E East; Monique E van Leerdam; Amit Rastogi; Maria Pellisé; Silvia Sanduleanu-Dascalescu; Barbara A J Bastiaansen; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Trouble in Paris (classification): polyp morphology is in the eye of the beholder.

Authors:  Samir Gupta
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Distribution, size and shape of colorectal adenomas as determined by a colonoscopist with a high lesion detection rate: Influence of age, sex and colonoscopy indication.

Authors:  Johannes L Klein; Murat Okcu; Karl H Preisegger; Heinz F Hammer
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Detection rates of premalignant polyps during screening colonoscopy: time to revise quality standards?

Authors:  William A Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Patrick M Lynch; Asif Rashid; Mala Pande; Mehnaz A Shafi; Jeffrey H Lee; Gottumukkala S Raju
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Dye-based chromoendoscopy following polypectomy reduces incomplete polyp resection.

Authors:  Neil R O'Morain; Mohd I Syafiq; Ammar Shahin; Barbara Ryan; Stephen Crowther; Deirdre McNamara
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-01-08

6.  Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Vikram Vadyala; Rebecca Slack; Somashekar G Krishna; William A Ross; Patrick M Lynch; Robert S Bresalier; Ernest Hawk; John R Stroehlein
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.