Literature DB >> 21159889

Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial.

Jürgen Pohl1, Arved Schneider, Hartmut Vogell, Gerhard Mayer, Gernot Kaiser, Christian Ell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Colonoscopy is the accepted gold standard for detecting colorectal adenomas, but the miss rate, especially for small and flat lesions, remains unacceptably high. The aim of this study was to determine whether enhanced mucosal contrast using pancolonic chromoendoscopy (PCC) allows higher rates of adenoma detection.
METHODS: In a prospective, randomised two-centre trial, PCC (with 0.4% indigo carmine spraying during continuous extubation) was compared with standard colonoscopy (control group) in consecutive patients attending for routine colonoscopy. The histopathology of the lesions detected was confirmed by evaluating the endoscopic resection or biopsy specimens.
RESULTS: A total of 1008 patients were included (496 in the PCC group, 512 in the control group). The patients' demographic characteristics and indications for colonoscopy were similar in the two groups. The proportion of patients with at least one adenoma was significantly higher in the PCC group (46.2%) than in the control group (36.3%; p = 0.002). Chromoendoscopy increased the overall detection rate for adenomas (0.95 vs 0.66 per patient), flat adenomas (0.56 vs 0.28 per patient) and serrated lesions (1.19 vs 0.49 per patient) (p < 0.001). There was a non-significant trend towards increased detection of advanced adenomas (103 vs 81; p = 0.067). Mean extubation times were slightly but significantly longer in the PCC group in comparison with the control group (11.6 ± 3.36 min vs 10.1 ± 2.03 min; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pancolonic chromoendoscopy markedly enhances adenoma detection rates in an average-risk population and is practicable enough for routine application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21159889     DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.229534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  54 in total

1.  Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods.

Authors:  Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Chromocolonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: Dive into the Big Blue.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

3.  Benchmarking and quality-screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

Review 4.  Quality monitoring in colonoscopy: Time to act.

Authors:  Mary A Atia; Francisco C Ramirez; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

Review 5.  Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.

Authors:  Vijeta Pamudurthy; Nayna Lodhia; Vani J A Konda
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 6.  Indications, stains and techniques in chromoendoscopy.

Authors:  P J Trivedi; B Braden
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2012-10-24

7.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

Review 8.  Role of new endoscopic techniques in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Jasmijn F Haanstra; Jan H Kleibeuker; Jan J Koornstra
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Comparison of Pentax HiLine and Olympus Lucera systems at screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Alexey Chernolesskiy; David Swain; James C Lee; Gareth D Corbett; Ewen Ab Cameron
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

Review 10.  Diagnosis, epidemiology and management of serrated polyposis syndrome: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Fotios S Fousekis; Ioannis V Mitselos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.