Literature DB >> 21964663

Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection.

Corey N White1, Roger Ratcliff, Jeffrey J Starns.   

Abstract

The present study tested diffusion models of processing in the flanker task, in which participants identify a target that is flanked by items that indicate the same (congruent) or opposite response (incongruent). Single- and dual-process flanker models were implemented in a diffusion-model framework and tested against data from experiments that manipulated response bias, speed/accuracy tradeoffs, attentional focus, and stimulus configuration. There was strong mimcry among the models, and each captured the main trends in the data for the standard conditions. However, when more complex conditions were used, a single-process spotlight model captured qualitative and quantitative patterns that the dual-process models could not. Since the single-process model provided the best balance of fit quality and parsimony, the results indicate that processing in the simple versions of the flanker task is better described by gradual rather than discrete narrowing of attention.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964663      PMCID: PMC3195995          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

Review 1.  An instance theory of attention and memory.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Jonathan W King
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-02

3.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

4.  Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff; Bradley J Wolfgang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models.

Authors:  S D Gronlund; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection.

Authors:  G Rowe; J B Hirsh; A K Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task.

Authors:  Wim Notebaert; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

10.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  The importance of decision onset.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Jack Grinband; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Individual differences in emotion word processing: A diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Christina J Mueller; Lars Kuchinke
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  A computational analysis of flanker interference in depression.

Authors:  D G Dillon; T Wiecki; P Pechtel; C Webb; F Goer; L Murray; M Trivedi; M Fava; P J McGrath; M Weissman; R Parsey; B Kurian; P Adams; T Carmody; S Weyandt; K Shores-Wilson; M Toups; M McInnis; M A Oquendo; C Cusin; P Deldin; G Bruder; D A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Modeling the interaction of numerosity and perceptual variables with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Inhan Kang; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A martingale analysis of first passage times of time-dependent Wiener diffusion models.

Authors:  Vaibhav Srivastava; Samuel F Feng; Jonathan D Cohen; Naomi Ehrich Leonard; Amitai Shenhav
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  Modeling Individual Differences in the Go/No-go Task with a Diffusion Model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Cynthia Huang-Pollock; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Decision (Wash D C )       Date:  2016-08-15

Review 7.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Quantifying mechanisms of cognition with an experiment and modeling ecosystem.

Authors:  Emily R Weichart; Kevin P Darby; Adam W Fenton; Brandon G Jacques; Ryan P Kirkpatrick; Brandon M Turner; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-18

9.  Beyond decision! Motor contribution to speed-accuracy trade-off in decision-making.

Authors:  Laure Spieser; Mathieu Servant; Thierry Hasbroucq; Borís Burle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

Review 10.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.