Literature DB >> 12713244

Flanker and negative flanker effects in letter identification.

Jeffrey N Rouder1, Jonathan W King.   

Abstract

In a speeded choice reaction time task, responses to centrally presented letter targets can be altered by the identity of surrounding task-irrelevant letters (flankers). In the standard flanker effect, flankers associated with the same response as the target lead to faster and more accurate responses, whereas flankers associated with a different response lead to slower and more error-prone responses. B. A. Eriksen and C. W. Eriksen (1974, pp. 143-149) have argued that these flanker effects occur through response competition. We present data from a novel version of the Eriksen task, in which some targets and flankers consist of letter forms that are morphed versions of target letters. In this paradigm, flankers induce classic flanker effects on well-formed targets. But flankers induce an opposite effect, termed a negative flanker effect on morphed letter targets. For example, targets that are morphs between the letters "A" and "H" are more likely to be identified as an "A" when flanked by an "H." The interpretation advanced here is that there are two distinct kinds of flanker effects contrast enhancement in perceptual processes and response competition in response selection processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12713244     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  4 in total

1.  Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Cognitive Advantages of Bilingual Children in Different Sociolinguistic Contexts.

Authors:  Elma Blom; Tessel Boerma; Evelyn Bosma; Leonie Cornips; Emma Everaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-21

3.  Now you see it, now you don't: Flanker presence induces the word concreteness effect.

Authors:  Aaron Vandendaele; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-10-29

4.  Gain control explains the effect of distraction in human perceptual, cognitive, and economic decision making.

Authors:  Vickie Li; Elizabeth Michael; Jan Balaguer; Santiago Herce Castañón; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.