Literature DB >> 15066392

Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays.

Philip L Smith1, Roger Ratcliff, Bradley J Wolfgang.   

Abstract

Mask-dependent cuing effects, like those previously found in yes-no detection, were found in a task in which observers judged the orientations of orthogonally-oriented Gabor patches presented at cued or uncued locations. Attentional cues enhanced sensitivity for masked, but not unmasked, stimuli. Responses were faster to cued than to uncued stimuli, irrespective of masking. The distributions of response times and accuracy were well described by a diffusion process model of decision making. Mask-dependent cuing was explained by an orienting model in which: (a) decisions are based on stable stimulus representations in visual short term memory that determine the rate of evidence accumulation in the diffusion process; (b) inattention delays the entry of stimuli into short term memory, and (c) masks limit the visual persistence of stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15066392     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  55 in total

Review 1.  The importance of decision onset.

Authors:  Tobias Teichert; Jack Grinband; Vincent Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Provenance of correlations in psychological data.

Authors:  Thomas L Thornton; David L Gilden
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

3.  Aging, practice, and perceptual tasks: a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-06

4.  Modeling response signal and response time data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Yukako T Hasegawa; Ryohei P Hasegawa; Philip L Smith; Mark A Segraves
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

8.  Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12

Review 9.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.