Literature DB >> 28630524

A martingale analysis of first passage times of time-dependent Wiener diffusion models.

Vaibhav Srivastava1,2, Samuel F Feng3, Jonathan D Cohen4,5, Naomi Ehrich Leonard1, Amitai Shenhav5.   

Abstract

Research in psychology and neuroscience has successfully modeled decision making as a process of noisy evidence accumulation to a decision bound. While there are several variants and implementations of this idea, the majority of these models make use of a noisy accumulation between two absorbing boundaries. A common assumption of these models is that decision parameters, e.g., the rate of accumulation (drift rate), remain fixed over the course of a decision, allowing the derivation of analytic formulas for the probabilities of hitting the upper or lower decision threshold, and the mean decision time. There is reason to believe, however, that many types of behavior would be better described by a model in which the parameters were allowed to vary over the course of the decision process. In this paper, we use martingale theory to derive formulas for the mean decision time, hitting probabilities, and first passage time (FPT) densities of a Wiener process with time-varying drift between two time-varying absorbing boundaries. This model was first studied by Ratcliff (1980) in the two-stage form, and here we consider the same model for an arbitrary number of stages (i.e. intervals of time during which parameters are constant). Our calculations enable direct computation of mean decision times and hitting probabilities for the associated multistage process. We also provide a review of how martingale theory may be used to analyze similar models employing Wiener processes by re-deriving some classical results. In concert with a variety of numerical tools already available, the current derivations should encourage mathematical analysis of more complex models of decision making with time-varying evidence.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28630524      PMCID: PMC5473348          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.

Authors:  Ian Krajbich; Carrie Armel; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

4.  A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Kong-Fatt Wong; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Decisions in changing conditions: the urgency-gating model.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; Geneviève Aude Puskas; Stephany El-Murr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The cost of accumulating evidence in perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Jan Drugowitsch; Rubén Moreno-Bote; Anne K Churchland; Michael N Shadlen; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Comparing fixed and collapsing boundary versions of the diffusion model.

Authors:  Chelsea Voskuilen; Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.

Authors:  Bingni W Brunton; Matthew M Botvinick; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Dianna R Amasino; Nicolette J Sullivan; Rachel E Kranton; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-02-25

Review 2.  Information Processing: The Language and Analytical Tools for Cognitive Psychology in the Information Age.

Authors:  Aiping Xiong; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-08

3.  A flexible framework for simulating and fitting generalized drift-diffusion models.

Authors:  Maxwell Shinn; Norman H Lam; John D Murray
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.