PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the mode of application, image quality (IQ), and radiation exposure resulting from introduction of a prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) acquisition mode into routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 prospectively triggered cardiac CTAs were conducted on 34 patients (11 female, 23 male; mean age 56 ± 15 y) using a high-pitch mode (pitch 3.4) on a dual-source CT. In 8 of these patients with higher heart rates or occasional premature ventricular contractions, 2 immediately subsequent CTAs were performed ("double flash protocol"). Subjective IQ was assessed for coronary arteries using a 4-point scale (1=unevaluable to 4=excellent). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured in 9 locations. CT Dose Index and dose-length product were obtained, and the patients' effective dose was calculated. RESULTS: Mean effective doses were 2.6 ± 1.4 mSv (range: 1.1 to 6.4) for the entire cardiac examination and 1.4 ± 0.7 mSv (0.4 to 3.1) for individual high-pitch cardiac CTA. z-coverage ranged from 9.9 cm in a native coronary CTA to 31.4 cm in a bypass graft case. The overall subjective IQ was good to excellent (mean score: 3.5), with 1.5% unevaluable coronary segments. The "double flash protocol" resulted in a fully diagnostic CT study in all cases just after taking both scans into consideration. The mean CNR of all locations was 19.7 ± 2.6. CONCLUSION: Prospectively electrocardiograph-triggered high-pitch-mode cardiac CTA is a feasible and promising technique in clinical routine, allowing for evaluation of coronaries at good-to-excellent IQ and providing high CNR and minimal radiation doses. The "double flash protocol" might become a more robust tool in patients with elevated heart rates or premature ventricular contractions.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the mode of application, image quality (IQ), and radiation exposure resulting from introduction of a prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) acquisition mode into routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 prospectively triggered cardiac CTAs were conducted on 34 patients (11 female, 23 male; mean age 56 ± 15 y) using a high-pitch mode (pitch 3.4) on a dual-source CT. In 8 of these patients with higher heart rates or occasional premature ventricular contractions, 2 immediately subsequent CTAs were performed ("double flash protocol"). Subjective IQ was assessed for coronary arteries using a 4-point scale (1=unevaluable to 4=excellent). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured in 9 locations. CT Dose Index and dose-length product were obtained, and the patients' effective dose was calculated. RESULTS: Mean effective doses were 2.6 ± 1.4 mSv (range: 1.1 to 6.4) for the entire cardiac examination and 1.4 ± 0.7 mSv (0.4 to 3.1) for individual high-pitch cardiac CTA. z-coverage ranged from 9.9 cm in a native coronary CTA to 31.4 cm in a bypass graft case. The overall subjective IQ was good to excellent (mean score: 3.5), with 1.5% unevaluable coronary segments. The "double flash protocol" resulted in a fully diagnostic CT study in all cases just after taking both scans into consideration. The mean CNR of all locations was 19.7 ± 2.6. CONCLUSION: Prospectively electrocardiograph-triggered high-pitch-mode cardiac CTA is a feasible and promising technique in clinical routine, allowing for evaluation of coronaries at good-to-excellent IQ and providing high CNR and minimal radiation doses. The "double flash protocol" might become a more robust tool in patients with elevated heart rates or premature ventricular contractions.
Authors: Robert C Hendel; Manesh R Patel; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Poon; Robert C Hendel; James C Carr; Nancy A Gerstad; Linda D Gillam; John McB Hodgson; Raymond J Kim; Christopher M Kramer; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Joseph V Messer; Rita F Redberg; Geoffrey D Rubin; John S Rumsfeld; Allen J Taylor; Wm Guy Weigold; Pamela K Woodard; Ralph G Brindis; Robert C Hendel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen; Manesh R Patel Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-10-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Maros Ferencik; Cesar H Nomura; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Udo Hoffmann; Antonio J Pena; Ricardo C Cury; Suhny Abbara; Koen Nieman; Umaima Fatima; Stephan Achenbach; Thomas J Brady Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Gudrun M Feuchtner; Daniel Jodocy; Andrea Klauser; Bernhard Haberfellner; Iman Aglan; Alexander Spoeck; Stefan Hiehs; Peter Soegner; Werner Jaschke Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-08-09 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Thomas C Gerber; Ronald S Kuzo; Gary E Lane; Peter C O'Brien; Nolan Karstaedt; Richard L Morin; Robert E Safford; Joseph L Blackshear; Jerald H Pietan Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: L Schimmöller; R S Lanzman; P Heusch; S Dietrich; F Miese; J Aissa; T A Heusner; G Antoch; P Kröpil Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Cathérine Gebhard; Tobias A Fuchs; Michael Fiechter; Julia Stehli; Barbara E Stähli; Oliver Gaemperli; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Joachim Eckert; Marco Schmidt; Annett Magedanz; Thomas Voigtländer; Axel Schmermund Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Tobias Penzkofer; Eva Donandt; Peter Isfort; Thomas Allmendinger; Christiane K Kuhl; Andreas H Mahnken; Philipp Bruners Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 1.930